Effect of collagen type I or type II on chondrogenesis by cultured human articular chondrocytes.

INTRODUCTION: Current cartilage repair procedures using autologous chondrocytes rely on a variety of carriers for implantation. Collagen types I and II are frequently used and valuable properties of both were shown earlier in vitro, although a preference for either was not demonstrated. Recently, however, fibrillar collagens were shown to promote cartilage degradation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of collagen type I and type II coating on chondrogenic properties of in vitro cultured human chondrocytes, and to investigate if collagen-mediated cartilage degradation occurs. METHODS: Human chondrocytes of eight healthy cartilage donors were isolated, expanded, and cultured on culture well inserts coated with either collagen type I, type II, or no coating (control). After 28 days of redifferentiation culture, safranin O and immunohistochemical staining for collagen types I, II, X, and Runx2/Cbfa1 were performed and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and DNA content and release were examined. Further, expression of collagen type I, type II, type X, MMP13, Runx2/Cbfa1, DDR2, α2 and ß1 integrin were examined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The matrix, created by chondrocytes grown on collagen type I- and II-coated membranes, resembled cartilage more than when grown on noncoated membranes as reflected by histological scoring. Immunohistochemical staining did not differ between the conditions. GAG content as well as GAG/DNA were higher for collagen type II-coated cartilage constructs than control. GAG release was also higher on collagen type I- and II-coated constructs. Expression of collagen type X was higher of chondrocytes grown on collagen type II compared to controls, but no collagen X protein could be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. No effects of collagen coating on DDR2 nor MMP-13 gene expression were found. No differences were observed between collagen types I and II. CONCLUSION: Chondrocyte culture on collagen type I or II promotes more active matrix production and turnover. No significant differences between collagen types I and II were observed, nor were hypertrophic changes more evident in either condition. The use of collagen type I or II coating for in vitro models, thus, seems a sound basis for in vivo repair procedures.

Aberrant intestinal stem cell lineage dynamics in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis consistent with protracted clonal evolution in the crypt.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic predisposition to cancer in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and the role of germline serine-threonine kinase (LKB1) mutations are poorly understood. The authors studied the effect of germline LKB1 mutations on intestinal stem cell dynamics in unaffected flat PJS mucosa. Recent research has documented that the intestinal crypt houses multiple equipotent stem cell lineages. Lineages continuously compete through random drifts, while somatically inherited methylation patterns record clonal diversity. DESIGN: To study the effect of germline LKB1 mutations on clonal expansion, the authors performed quantitative analyses of cardiac-specific homeobox methylation pattern diversity in crypts isolated from unaffected colonic mucosa obtained from archival PJS patient material. The authors compared methylation density and methylation pattern diversity in patients with PJS to those in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and age-matched controls. RESULTS: The percentage of total methylation is comparable between groups, but the number of unique methylation patterns is significantly increased for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and patients with PJS compared to control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Monoallelic LKB1 loss is not silent and provokes a protracted clonal evolution in the crypt. The increased methylation pattern diversity observed in unaffected PJS mucosa predicts that premalignant lesions will arise at an accelerated pace compared to the general population.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by multiple distinct juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The cumulative life-time risk of colorectal cancer is 39% and the relative risk is 34. Juvenile polyps have a distinctive histology characterized by an abundance of edematous lamina propria with inflammatory cells and cystically dilated glands lined by cuboidal to columnar epithelium with reactive changes. Clinically, juvenile polyposis syndrome is defined by the presence of 5 or more juvenile polyps in the colorectum, juvenile polyps throughout the gastrointestinal tract or any number of juvenile polyps and a positive family history of juvenile polyposis. In about 50%-60% of patients diagnosed with juvenile polyposis syndrome a germline mutation in the SMAD4 or BMPR1A gene is found. Both genes play a role in the BMP/TGF-beta signalling pathway. It has been suggested that cancer in juvenile polyposis may develop through the so-called "landscaper mechanism" where an abnormal stromal environment leads to neoplastic transformation of the adjacent epithelium and in the end invasive carcinoma. Recognition of this rare disorder is important for patients and their families with regard to treatment, follow-up and screening of at risk individuals. Each clinician confronted with the diagnosis of a juvenile polyp should therefore consider the possibility of juvenile polyposis syndrome. In addition, juvenile polyposis syndrome provides a unique model to study colorectal cancer pathogenesis in general and gives insight in the molecular genetic basis of cancer. This review discusses clinical manifestations, genetics, pathogenesis and management of juvenile polyposis syndrome.

LKB1 as the ghostwriter of crypt history.

Familial cancer syndromes present rare insights into malignant tumor development. The molecular background of polyp formation and the cancer prone state in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome remain enigmatic to this day. Previously, we proposed that Peutz-Jeghers polyps are not pre-malignant lesions, but an epiphenomenon to the malignant condition. However, Peutz-Jeghers polyp formation and the cancer-prone state must both be accounted for by the same molecular mechanism. Our contribution focuses on the histopathology of the characteristic Peutz-Jeghers polyp and recent research on stem cell dynamics and how these concepts relate to Peutz-Jeghers polyposis. We discuss a protracted clonal evolution scenario in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome due to a germline LKB1 mutation. Peutz-Jeghers polyp formation and malignant transformation are separately mediated through the same molecular mechanism played out on different timescales. Thus, a single mechanism accounts for the development of benign Peutz-Jeghers polyps and for malignant transformation in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

Diversity counts. Visualizing pretumor progression in the gastrointestinal tract.

Tumor progression is critically dependent on the selection of genetic alterations. This clonal evolution can be traced to the stage preceding visible tumor formation called pretumor progression, in which genetic change occurs without visible change. Recently, the identification of intestinal stem cell markers in animal models has made visualization of stem cells possible in vivo. Translating this work to the clinical setting by visualizing stem cells in patient material may allow us to understand differences in patients' vulnerability to cancer development and target preventive measures to high-risk groups. In this review article, we examine some of the analytic methods currently used in research settings tracing stem cell dynamics.

Histologic variations in juvenile polyp phenotype correlate with genetic defect underlying juvenile polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile polyps are distinct hamartomatous malformations of the gastrointestinal tract that may occur in the heritable juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) or sporadically. Histologically, juvenile polyps are characterized by a marked increase of the stromal cell compartment, but an epithelial phenotype has also been reported. JPS has an increased risk of colorectal cancer but sporadic juvenile polyps do not. In 50% to 60% of patients with JPS, a germline mutation of the transforming growth factor-ß/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway genes SMAD4 or BMPR1A is found. This study compares the histologic phenotype of juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation and sporadic juvenile polyps. METHODS: Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained slides of 65 JPS polyps and 25 sporadic juvenile polyps were reviewed for histologic features and dysplasia. Systematic random crypt and stroma counts were obtained by count stereology, and a crypt-stroma ratio was determined. All polyps were subsequently categorized as type A (crypt-stroma ratio <1.00) or type B (crypt-stroma ratio ≥1.00), the latter referring to the epithelial phenotype. Cell cycle activity was assessed using immunohistochemistry ofthe proliferation marker Ki67, and mutation analysis was carried out for KRAS and APC to determine the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. RESULTS: Juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 germline mutation were predominantly type B, whereas type A was more common among juvenile polyps with a BMPR1A germline mutation. However, this distinction could not be ascribed to differences in cell cycle activity. Dysplasia was equally common in JPS polyps with either a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation, in which the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence does not seem to play a distinct role. CONCLUSION: Juvenile polyps in the setting of JPS exhibit distinct phenotypes correlating with the underlying genetic defect.

SMAD4 immunohistochemistry reflects genetic status in juvenile polyposis syndrome.

PURPOSE: Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) can be caused by a germline defect of the SMAD4 gene. Somatic inactivation of SMAD4 occurs in pancreatic and colorectal cancers and is reflected by loss of SMAD4 immunohistochemistry. Here, SMAD4 immunohistochemistry as a marker of SMAD4 gene status and the role of SMAD4 in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in neoplastic progression in JPS are studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty polyps with a SMAD4 germline defect and 38 control polyps were studied by SMAD4 immunohistochemistry. Inactivation of the SMAD4 wild-type allele was studied in dysplastic epithelium and in areas with aberrant SMAD4 expression. APC, beta-catenin, p53, and K-ras were studied to evaluate the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. RESULTS: Nine of 20 polyps with a SMAD4 germline defect showed loss of epithelial SMAD4 expression. Loss of heterozygosity of SMAD4 was found in five polyps and a somatic stop codon mutation was found in two polyps without loss of heterozygosity. Remarkably, somatic inactivation of epithelial SMAD4 did not always coincide with dysplasia and aberrant p53 staining was found in four of six dysplastic polyps with normal SMAD4 staining. One K-ras mutation was found in nine juvenile polyps with dysplasia. No evidence for Wnt activation was found. CONCLUSIONS: SMAD4 immunohistochemistry mirrors genetic status and provides a specific adjunct in the molecular diagnosis of JPS. However, epithelial SMAD4 inactivation is not required for polyp formation and is not obligatory for neoplastic progression in JPS. Instead, different routes to neoplasia in JPS caused by germline SMAD4 mutation seem to be operative, including somatic loss of SMAD4 and p53 inactivation without somatic loss of SMAD4.