Predicting hyperbaric oxygen therapy success using the decision tree approach.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), a procedure that involves the patient inhaling 100% oxygen gas under pressure, is currently used as an adjunctive treatment option for certain inflammatory conditions. HBOT can improve wound healing by increasing the rate of angiogenesis in injured tissue by increasing levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF causes re-epithelialization, the migration of endothelial cells, and the formation of granulation tissue, which are involved in the wound healing process. METHODS: This study contains secondary data analyses of information previously collected in two separate studies, each concerning the effects of HBOT on diabetic foot ulcers and crush injury fractures at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado and Siloam Hospital Manado from 2019 to early 2020. RESULTS: Based on the classification tree analysis, the predictors of HBOT success were leukocytes level (34%), platelet count (32%), and age (26%). The conditional inference tree analysis also indicated significant leukocyte levels, age, and platelet counts (p < 0.001), with which the interpretation of these results was the same as the classification tree analysis method. The results obtained from the random forest analysis revealed that the mean value of Gini reduction for leukocytes (207.3), platelets (110.2), age (97.9), and hemoglobin (57.9) can be used as indicators of successful HBOT. These three methods support that age, leukocytes, and platelets are determinants of HBOT success, while hemoglobin levels were only significant in one analysis method. Therefore, a new, proposed algorithm containing these factors was assembled from the results of this study. CONCLUSION: HBOT cannot be separated from specific variables that contribute to and can predict its success.

Clinical experience with insulin detemir: results from the Indonesian cohort of the international A1chieve study.

AIM: To determine the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in Indonesian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) as a sub-analysis of the 24-week, prospective, multinational, non-interventional A1chieve study. METHODS: This study included 477 Indonesian T2D patients starting insulin detemir at the discretion of their physicians. Safety and efficacy was measured in routine clinical practice at baseline, interim (around 12 weeks from baseline) and final (around 24 weeks from baseline) visit. RESULTS: At baseline the mean age, duration of diabetes and mean BMI were 55.3 ± 8.5 years, 5.9 ± 4.0 years and 24 ± 3.6 kg/m(2), respectively. Of these patients, 78% were insulin-naive and 22% were prior insulin users. Glycaemic control was poor at baseline. After 24 weeks, significant reductions were observed in mean HbA1c (2.2%, p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (90.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and postprandial plasma glucose (115.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001) levels, in the entire cohort. Similar significant reductions were also seen in insulin-naive patients and prior insulin users. In the entire cohort, 32.5% patients achieved HbA1c levels <7.0% while 32.0% insulin-naive patients and 33.9% prior insulin users achieved this target after 24 weeks. No hypoglycaemic events were reported in the entire cohort. Modest increase in body weight was noted in the insulin-naive group, while mean body weight decreased in prior insulin users after 24 weeks of insulin detemir therapy. CONCLUSION: This sub-analysis suggests that insulin detemir can be a safe and effective option for initiating insulin therapy in people with T2D in Indonesia.

Clinical experience with BIAsp 30: results from the Indonesian cohort of the international A1chieve study.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in Indonesian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) as part of the 24-week, international, prospective, non-interventional A1chieve study. METHODS: Indonesian patients who started BIAsp 30 were included. Safety and efficacy was measured as part of routine clinical practice at baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. RESULTS: Overall, 1324 patients having a mean ± SD age, duration of diabetes and body mass index of 55.2 ± 9.9 yrs, 6.8 ± 5.2 yrs and 24.1 ± 3.6 kg/m(2), respectively, were enrolled. 67% of patients were insulin-naive and 33% were prior insulin users. Glycaemic control was poor at baseline. After 24 weeks, significant reductions from baseline were observed in the mean glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (-2.6%), fasting plasma glucose (-93.8 mg/dL) and postprandial plasma glucose (-134.8 mg/dL) levels in the entire cohort (p < 0.001). Significant reductions were also seen in insulin-naive patients and prior insulin users. At Week 24, 29.9% of patients in the entire cohort achieved target HbA1c level of <7.0%, while 26.7% and 39.2% achieved this target among insulin-naive patients and prior insulin users, respectively. The proportion of patients reporting overall hypoglycaemia significantly decreased in the entire cohort after 24 weeks of BIAsp 30 therapy. A small significant increase in body weight was noted in the entire cohort, insulin-naive patients and prior insulin users. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that BIAsp 30 can be considered as a safe and effective option for initiating as well as intensifying insulin therapy in Indonesian patients with T2D.