68Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with MRI/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for primary lymph node staging prior to definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT with conventional cross-sectional imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) for detecting lymph node metastasis (LNM) to stage prostate cancer patients. Twenty consecutive, newly- diagnosed prostate cancer patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, anatomical MRI or contrast-enhanced CT, and DW-MRI prior to laparoscopic, template-based, extended lymph node dissection. Histopathological findings served as the reference test. RESULTS: Histopathology showed LNM in 13 of 20 patients (19 high-risk, 1 intermediate risk). Five patients had metastasis-suspected lymph nodes on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for detecting LNM were 39% and 100% with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 8% and 100% with MRI/CT, and 36% and 83% with DW-MRI, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 49% with 68Ga-PSMA PET/C, 100% and 37% with MRI/CT, and 80% and 42% with DW-MRI. Of 573 dissected lymph nodes, 33 were LNM from 26 regions. True-positive LNM on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 9-11 mm in diameter, whereas false-negative LNM had a median diameter of 4 mm, with only 3 of 30 lymph nodes being larger than 10 mm. LNM were positive for PSMA by immunostaining. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was notably better than that of MRI/CT and comparable to that of DW-MRI. Some false positive findings with DW-MRI reduced its specificity and positive predictive value compared with those of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI/CT.

No Added Value of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer with Normal Bone Scintigraphy.

The aim of this study was to determine if additional 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT (NaF PET/CT) improves the prognostic accuracy in the initial staging of prostate cancer patients with normal bone scintigraphy undergoing prostatectomy. Methods: A prospective cohort study examined NaF PET/CT in intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer with negative bone scintigraphy who were scheduled for prostatectomy. Biochemical response: PSA levels < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 wk and 6 mo postoperatively, PSA level ≥ 0.2 ng/mL was biochemical failure. Results: Eighty-one patients were included in the study; 75 patients (93%) achieved biochemical responses, 6 patients had biochemical failure. NaF PET/CT indicated bone metastasis in 1 patient (1.2%), was equivocal in 7 patients (8.6%), without bone metastases in 73 patients (90.1%). Eight patients with bone metastases or equivocal results on NaF PET/CT exhibited biochemical responses. All patients with biochemical failure had negative NaF PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for bone metastases. Conclusion: NaF PET/CT has no added value for bone staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients with normal bone scintigraphy results undergoing prostatectomy.

Phase III Trial of PROSTVAC in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: PROSTVAC, a viral vector-based immunotherapy, prolonged median overall survival (OS) by 8.5 months versus placebo in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a phase II study. This phase III study further investigated those findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to PROSTVAC (Arm V; n = 432), PROSTVAC plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Arm VG; n = 432), or placebo (Arm P; n = 433), stratified by prostate-specific antigen (less than 50 ng/mL v 50 ng/mL or more) and lactate dehydrogenase (less than 200 v 200 U/L or more). Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were patients alive without events (AWE)-namely, radiographic progression, pain progression, chemotherapy initiation, or death-at 6 months and safety. The study design was a superiority trial of PROSTVAC (Arm V or Arm VG) versus Arm P. Three interim analyses were planned. RESULTS: At the third interim analysis, criteria for futility were met and the trial was stopped early. Neither active treatment had an effect on median OS (Arm V, 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20; P = .47; Arm VG, 33.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .59; Arm P, 34.3 months). Likewise, AWE at 6 months was similar (Arm V, 29.4%; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.29; Arm VG, 28.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.20; placebo, 30.3%). Adverse events were similar for the treatment and placebo groups, with the most common being injection site reactions (62% to 72%) and fatigue (21% to 24%). Arrhythmias were the most common cardiac-related events (1.4% to 3.5%). There were no reports of either myocarditis or pericarditis. Serious treatment-related events occurred in less than 1% of all patients. CONCLUSION: Whereas PROSTVAC was safe and well tolerated, it had no effect on OS or AWE in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Combination therapy is currently being explored in clinical trials.

Prospective comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracies for detection of bone metastases by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW600-MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS: Sixty-eight PCa patients with BCR participated in this prospective study. The patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a 18F-NaF PET/CT and a DW600-MRI (performed in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines, with b values of 0 and 600 s/mm2). Bone lesions were categorized using a three-point scale (benign, malignant or equivocal for metastases) and a dichotomous scale (benign or metastatic) for each imaging modality by at least two experienced observers. A best valuable comparator was defined for each patient based on study-specific imaging, at least 12 months of clinical follow-up and any imaging prior to the study and during follow-up. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a sensitivity analysis where equivocal lesions were handled as non-metastatic and then as metastatic. RESULTS: Ten of the 68 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. On a patient level, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis were, respectively, 0.80, 0.98-1.00 and 0.89-0.90 for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (n = 68 patients); 0.90, 0.90-0.98 and 0.90-0.94 for 18NaF PET/CT (n = 67 patients); and 0.25-0.38, 0.87-0.92 and 0.59-0.62 for DW600-MRI (n = 60 patients). The diagnostic performance of DW600-MRI was significantly lower than that of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18NaF PET/CT for diagnosing bone metastases (p < 0.01), and no significant difference in the AUC was seen between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18NaF PET/CT (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT showed comparable and high diagnostic accuracies for detecting bone metastases in PCa patients with BCR. Both methods performed significantly better than DW600-MRI, which was inadequate for diagnosing bone metastases when conducted in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, 2-Center Study.

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the detection rate of Ga-PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer and its impact on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with BCR after curatively intended treatment of prostate cancer were included. Each patient underwent a Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Changes in patient management based on the results of Ga-PSMA PET/CT were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included. Sixty-four patients (91%) had radical prostatectomy, of whom 17 patients (24%) received salvage radiation therapy due to first biochemical relapse. Six patients (9%) underwent radiation therapy as the primary treatment. Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected recurrent disease in 37 patients (53%). The detection rate was 22% for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels up to 0.5 ng/mL compared with 83% for PSA levels greater than 0.5 ng/mL. Pathological uptake of Ga-PSMA was observed in 4 (16%) of 21, 4 (44%) of 9, 0 of 1, 7 (70%) of 10, and 22 (88%) of 25 patients with PSA levels from 0.2 to 0.3 ng/mL, 0.31 to 0.4 ng/mL, 0.41 to 0.5 ng/mL, 0.51 to 1 ng/mL, and greater than 1 ng/mL, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen was significantly higher in PSMA-positive patients than in PSMA-negative patients. In 15 (22%) of 69 patients, the results caused a definite change in patient management, and in another 15 (22%) of 69 patients, Ga-PSMA PET/CT guided the choice of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ga-PSMA PET/CT detects lesions in a large proportion of patients with BCR. Detection rates at low PSA levels (<0.5 ng/mL) were notably below the values reported in previous retrospective studies; however, detection rates improved with increasing PSA levels.

Diagnostic test accuracy study of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, 99mTc-labelled diphosphonate SPECT/CT, and planar bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer.

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare planar, bone scan (BS) versus SPECT/CT and NaF PET/CT in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer. Thirty-seven consecutive, newly diagnosed, prostate cancer patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥ 50 ng/mL and who were considered eligible for androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) were included in this study. BS, SPECT/CT, and NaF PET/CT, were performed prior to treatment and were repeated after six months of ADT. Baseline images from each index test were independently read by two experienced readers. The reference standard was based on a consensus decision made by a multidisciplinary team on the basis of baseline and follow-up images of the index tests, the findings of the baseline index tests by the experienced readers, and any available imaging, biochemical, and clinical data, including the response to ADT. Twenty-seven (73%) of the 37 patients had bone metastases according to the reference standard. The sensitivities for BS, SPECT/CT and NaF PET/CT were 78%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, and the specificities were 90%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. The positive predictive values of BS, SPECT/CT and NaF PET/CT were 96%, 100%, and 96%, respectively, and the negative predictive values were 60%, 77% and 75%, respectively. No statistically significant difference among the three imaging modalities was observed. All three imaging modalities showed high sensitivity and specificity. NaF PET/CT and SPECT/CT showed numerically improved, but not statistically superior, sensitivity compared with BS in this limited and selected patient cohort.

A Comprehensive Safety Evaluation of 68Ga-Labeled Ligand Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen 11 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: The Results of 2 Prospective, Multicenter Trials.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety profile of the Ga-PSMA-11 ligand for PET/CT imaging in prospective clinical trials. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent prostate cancer participated in 2 prospective trials. Safety reporting was identical in the 2 trials. The Ga-PSMA-11 ligand was administered as 2 MBq/kg body weight (mean, 9.2 µg, 9.7 nmol). The reporting of clinical adverse events (AEs) and the measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were performed prior to injection (baseline); immediately after injection of Ga-PSMA-11 (postinjection); at 1, 10, and 60 minutes after injection; and after acquisition of the PET/CT scan (postscan). All hemodynamic assessments were performed in the supine position, except for the postscan measurement (sitting). The patients were interviewed regarding any AEs at baseline, postinjection, or postscan. In addition, the patients were instructed to report any AEs during the investigation and to contact the investigator if AEs occurred during the rest of the day. Adverse events were classified as mild, moderate, or severe by the patients and categorized by the investigator using the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.0. RESULTS: There were no reported clinical AEs. There were significant decreases in systolic BP (P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.001) over time. In comparison, the diastolic BP increased significantly (P < 0.001). After removal of the last observation (supine position), there was no time-dependent change in systolic or diastolic BP, but the significant change in HR remained. The mean changes over the entire observation period were minimal (systolic BP, -6 to 5 mm Hg; diastolic BP, -2 to 3 mm Hg; HR, decrease of 5 beats/min). No patients developed hypotension. Fifty-five patients presented with hypertension at baseline, which increased by 1 CTCAE grade in 15 patients and by 2 grades in 2 patients. A large number of cases of asymptomatic (grade 1) bradycardia were observed, primarily in patients with preexisting bradycardia. One patient developed transient grade 1 tachycardia. No patients required medical intervention for cardiovascular perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was very well tolerated. We consider Ga-PSMA-11 to be safe for human application.

(18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, diagnostic test accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: For decades, planar bone scintigraphy has been the standard practice for detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer and has been endorsed by recent oncology/urology guidelines. It is a sensitive method with modest specificity. (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography has shown improved sensitivity and specificity over bone scintigraphy, but because of methodological issues such as retrospective design and verification bias, the existing level of evidence with (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography is limited. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic properties of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scintigraphy on an individual patient basis. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred forty consecutive, high-risk prostate cancer patients will be recruited from several hospitals in Denmark. Sample size was calculated using Hayen's method for diagnostic comparative studies. This study will be conducted in accordance with recommendations of standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Eligibility criteria comprise the following: 1) biopsy-proven prostate cancer, 2) PSA ≥ 50 ng/ml (equals a prevalence of bone metastasis of ≈ 50% in the study population on bone scintigraphy), 3) patients must be eligible for androgen deprivation therapy, 4) no current or prior cancer (within the past 5 years), 5) ability to comply with imaging procedures, and 6) patients must not receive any investigational drugs. Planar bone scintigraphy and (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography will be performed within a window of 14 days at baseline. All scans will be repeated after 26 weeks of androgen deprivation therapy, and response of individual lesions will be used for diagnostic classification of the lesions on baseline imaging among responding patients. A response is defined as PSA normalisation or ≥ 80% reduction compared with baseline levels, testosterone below castration levels, no skeletal related events, and no clinical signs of progression. Images are read by blinded nuclear medicine physicians. The protocol is currently recruiting. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest prospective studies comparing (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. It is conducted in full accordance with recommendations for diagnostic accuracy trials. It is intended to provide valid documentation for the use of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography for examination of bone metastasis in the staging of prostate cancer.