An in vivo screen for proteolytic switch domains that can mediate Notch activation by force.

Notch proteins are single pass transmembrane receptors that are activated by proteolytic cleavage, allowing their cytosolic domains to function as transcription factors in the nucleus. Upon binding, Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 (DSL) ligands activate Notch by exerting a "pulling" force across the intercellular ligand/receptor bridge. This pulling force is generated by Epsin-mediated endocytosis of ligand into the signal-sending cells, and results in cleavage of the force-sensing Negative Regulatory Region (NRR) of the receptor by an ADAM10 protease [Kuzbanian (Kuz) in Drosophila ]. Here, we have used chimeric Notch and DSL proteins to screen for other domains that can substitute for the NRR in the developing Drosophila wing. While many of the tested domains are either refractory to cleavage or constitutively cleaved, we identify several that mediate Notch activation in response to ligand. These NRR analogues derive from widely divergent source proteins and have strikingly different predicted structures. Yet, almost all depend on force exerted by Epsin-mediated ligand endocytosis and cleavage catalyzed by Kuz. We posit that the sequence space of protein domains that can serve as force-sensing proteolytic switches in Notch activation is unexpectedly large, a conclusion that has implications for the mechanism of target recognition by Kuz/ADAM10 proteases and is consistent with a more general role for force dependent ADAM10 proteolysis in other cell contact-dependent signaling mechanisms. Our results also validate the screen for increasing the repertoire of proteolytic switches available for synthetic Notch (synNotch) therapies and tissue engineering.

Synthetic Notch Activation Patterns in a Proliferating Tissue.

Cell-cell communication through direct contact is essential during fundamental biological processes such as tissue repair and morphogenesis. Synthetic forms of contact-mediated cell-cell communication can generate custom gene expression outputs, making them valuable for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. To precisely control the location and timing of synthetic signal outputs in growing tissues, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying its spatiotemporal patterns. Towards this goal, we combine theory and experiments to study patterns of synthetic Notch (synNotch) activation - a custom synthetic gene circuit that we implement within Drosophila wing imaginal discs. We show that output synthesis and degradation rates together with cell division are the key minimal parameters that predict the heterogeneous spatiotemporal patterns of synNotch activation. Notably, synNotch output forms a graded exponential spatial profile that extends several cell diameters from the signal source, establishing evidence for signal propagation without diffusion or long range cell-cell communication. Furthermore, we discover that the shape of the interface between ligand and receptor cells is important in determining the synNotch output. Overall, we elucidate key biophysical principles that underlie complex emergent spatiotemporal patterns of synNotch output in a growing tissue.

Evolutionary plasticity in the requirement for force exerted by ligand endocytosis to activate C. elegans Notch proteins.

The conserved transmembrane receptor Notch has diverse and profound roles in controlling cell fate during animal development. In the absence of ligand, a negative regulatory region (NRR) in the Notch ectodomain adopts an autoinhibited confirmation, masking an ADAM protease cleavage site;1,2 ligand binding induces cleavage of the NRR, leading to Notch ectodomain shedding as the first step of signal transduction.3,4 In Drosophila and vertebrates, recruitment of transmembrane Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 (DSL) ligands by the endocytic adaptor Epsin, and their subsequent internalization by Clathrin-mediated endocytosis, exerts a "pulling force" on Notch that is essential to expose the cleavage site in the NRR.4-6 Here, we show that Epsin-mediated endocytosis of transmembrane ligands is not essential to activate the two C. elegans Notch proteins, LIN-12 and GLP-1. Using an in vivo force sensing assay in Drosophila,6 we present evidence (1) that the LIN-12 and GLP-1 NRRs are tuned to lower force thresholds than the NRR of Drosophila Notch, and (2) that this difference depends on the absence of a "leucine plug" that occludes the cleavage site in the Drosophila and vertebrate Notch NRRs.1,2 Our results thus establish an unexpected evolutionary plasticity in the force-dependent mechanism of Notch activation and implicate a specific structural element, the leucine plug, as a determinant.

Epsin-Dependent Ligand Endocytosis Activates Notch by Force.

DSL ligands activate Notch by inducing proteolytic cleavage of the receptor ectodomain, an event that requires ligand to be endocytosed in signal-sending cells by the adaptor protein Epsin. Two classes of explanation for this unusual requirement are (1) recycling models, in which the ligand must be endocytosed to be modified or repositioned before it binds Notch and (2) pulling models, in which the ligand must be endocytosed after it binds Notch to exert force that exposes an otherwise buried site for cleavage. We demonstrate in vivo that ligands that cannot enter the Epsin pathway nevertheless bind Notch but fail to activate the receptor because they cannot exert sufficient force. This argues against recycling models and in favor of pulling models. Our results also suggest that once ligand binds receptor, activation depends on a competition between Epsin-mediated ligand endocytosis, which induces cleavage, and transendocytosis of the ligand by the receptor, which aborts the incipient signal.

Mutants in the Dictyostelium Arp2/3 complex and chemoattractant-induced actin polymerization.

We have investigated the role of the Arp2/3 complex in Dictyostelium cell chemotaxis towards cyclic-AMP and in the actin polymerization that is triggered by this chemoattractant. We confirm that the Arp2/3 complex is recruited to the cell perimeter, or into a pseudopod, after cyclic-AMP stimulation and that this is coincident with actin polymerization. This recruitment is inhibited when actin polymerization is blocked using latrunculin suggesting that the complex binds to pre-existing actin filaments, rather than to a membrane associated signaling complex. We show genetically that an intact Arp2/3 complex is essential in Dictyostelium and have produced partially active mutants in two of its subunits. In these mutants both phases of actin polymerization in response to cyclic-AMP are greatly reduced. One mutant projects pseudopodia more slowly than wild type and has impaired chemotaxis, together with slower movement. The second mutant chemotaxes poorly due to an adhesion defect, suggesting that the Arp2/3 complex plays a crucial part in adhering cells to the substratum as they move. We conclude that the Arp2/3 complex largely mediates the actin polymerization response to chemotactic stimulation and contributes to cell motility, pseudopod extension and adhesion in Dictyostelium chemotaxis.

Blebbing of Dictyostelium cells in response to chemoattractant.

Stimulation of Dictyostelium cells with a high uniform concentration of the chemoattractant cyclic-AMP induces a series of morphological changes, including cell rounding and subsequent extension of pseudopodia in random directions. Here we report that cyclic-AMP also elicits blebs and analyse their mechanism of formation. The surface area and volume of cells remain constant during blebbing indicating that blebs form by the redistribution of cytoplasm and plasma membrane rather than the exocytosis of internal membrane coupled to a swelling of the cell. Blebbing occurs immediately after a rapid rise and fall in submembraneous F-actin, but the blebs themselves contain little F-actin as they expand. A mutant with a partially inactivated Arp2/3 complex has a greatly reduced rise in F-actin content, yet shows a large increase in blebbing. This suggests that bleb formation is not enhanced by the preceding actin dynamics, but is actually inhibited by them. In contrast, cells that lack myosin-II completely fail to bleb. We conclude that bleb expansion is likely to be driven by hydrostatic pressure produced by cortical contraction involving myosin-II. As blebs are induced by chemoattractant, we speculate that hydrostatic pressure is one of the forces driving pseudopod extension during movement up a gradient of cyclic-AMP.