The QT interval prolongation potential of anticancer and supportive drugs: a comprehensive overview.

Patients with cancer are prone to prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) due to the use of anticancer drugs with QTc-prolonging potential in combination with electrolyte imbalances caused by, for example, gastrointestinal side-effects. However, most anticancer drugs were approved with little information on their QTc-prolonging potential and the added risk of torsade de pointes. The absence of this information on the drug label poses a considerable challenge to clinicians regarding the measures that need to be taken to safely start anticancer treatment. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence for the QTc-prolonging properties of 205 anticancer drugs and 14 antiemetic drugs available from drug labels, assessment reports, and published studies. We classify the drugs as low-risk, moderate-risk, or high-risk for QTc prolongation. We also discuss the clinical relevance of these findings and include practical recommendations to guide clinicians to select the drugs with the least QTc-prolonging properties and to adequately monitor susceptible patients.

Relatively mild symptoms after chronic overdose with a double-dose encorafenib: a case report.

Encorafenib (Braftovi) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation, in combination with binimetinib (Mektovi). According to the product label of encorafenib, there are no specific treatment recommendations in case of an overdose. We report on a 63-year-old man who ingested a double dose (900 mg) of encorafenib for 16 days. He developed overall minor chronic overdose symptoms such as nausea and vomiting grade 1 and muscle pain. Based on the most occurring adverse events of encorafenib, liver values, kidney function parameters and QTc interval were measured. Kidney function parameters were normal, whereas liver values were slightly increased (grade 1) and QTc slightly prolonged. The plasma concentration 3 h after the last dose was 2110 ng/mL. We describe the course of a case with a chronic overdose during 16 days of the double dose of encorafenib as well as the followed approach, which could be taken into account when observing an encorafenib overdose. Providing information in times of Covid-19 is challenging, but remains necessary for good clinical care.

Dose recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.

Renal or hepatic impairment is a common comorbidity for patients with cancer either because of the disease itself, toxicity of previous anticancer treatments, or because of other factors affecting organ function, such as increased age. Because renal and hepatic function are among the main determinants of drug exposure, the pharmacokinetic profile might be altered for patients with cancer who have renal or hepatic impairment, necessitating dose adjustments. Most anticancer drugs are dosed near their maximum tolerated dose and are characterised by a narrow therapeutic index. Consequently, selecting an adequate dose for patients who have either hepatic or renal impairment, or both, is challenging and definitive recommendations on dose adjustments are scarce. In this Review, we discuss the effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs. To guide clinicians in selecting appropriate dose adjustments, information from available drug labels and from the published literature were combined to provide a practical set of recommendations for dose adjustments of 160 anticancer drugs for patients with hepatic and renal impairment.

Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

AIM: Fixed dose oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib show a high interpatient variability in plasma exposure. A relationship between plasma exposure and treatment outcome has been established, which supports the rationale for dose optimization of these drugs. The aim of this study was to monitor how many patients reached adequate trough levels after therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization in daily practice. METHODS: A cohort study was performed in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib or pazopanib of whom follow-up drug levels were measured between August 2012 and April 2016. Patients' characteristics were collected by reviewing electronic patient records. Drug levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and trough levels were estimated using a predefined algorithm. Dose interventions were proposed based on trough levels. RESULTS: In total, 396 trough levels were determined in 109 patients. Median sample frequency per patient was 3. During the first measurement only 38% of patients showed trough levels within the predefined target ranges despite standard dosing; 52% of the patients showed drug levels below and 10% above the target range. In 35 out of 41 patients (85%) dose interventions led to adequate trough levels. Eventually, 64% of the total cohort reached adequate trough levels. CONCLUSIONS: Dose optimization proved an effective tool to reach adequate trough levels in patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib. The percentage of patients with adequate trough levels increased from 38 to 64%. Therapeutic drug monitoring may add to the improvement of efficacy and reduction of toxicity and costs of these treatments.

Concentrations of Erlotinib in Tumor Tissue and Plasma in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Tumors might not optimally respond to systemic therapy if minimal effective levels are not reached within the tumor. Erlotinib has mainly been studied in the adjuvant or palliative setting and, therefore, little is known about erlotinib tumor penetration. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate lung tumor tissue erlotinib concentrations after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated preoperatively with erlotinib (150 mg once daily for 3 weeks) up to 48 hours before surgery. Plasma samples were collected during treatment. Surgical resection involved radical resection of the lung tumor and tumor biopsies were frozen directly after surgery. Erlotinib and O-desmethyl erlotinib concentrations in lung tumor tissue and predose plasma were determined using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Thirteen evaluable patients were included. The mean plasma and lung tumor tissue erlotinib levels were 1222 ng/mL (SD, 678) and 149 ng/g (SD, 153), respectively. In 2 individual patients, erlotinib and O-desmethyl erlotinib concentrations in lung tumor tissue were detectable up to 13 days and 7 days after erlotinib intake, respectively. Mean erlotinib tissue concentrations extrapolated to a time point directly after intake of erlotinib were approximated at > 200 ng/g tissue, which is greater than the reported half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of wild type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (183 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: No strong accumulation of erlotinib in lung tumor tissue was observed. Nevertheless, extrapolated intratumoral concentrations during erlotinib therapy were greater than the IC50 of wild type EGFR.

Dasatinib in combination with fludarabine in patients with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase 2 study.

Resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in CLL is associated with overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins induced by signals from the microenvironment. In vitro, dasatinib effectively inhibits expression of anti-apoptotic regulators and restores fludarabine sensitivity in activated CLL. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of one cycle of dasatinib monotherapy (100mg/day, days 1-28) followed by combination of dasatinib with fludarabine (40mg/m²/day, days 1-3 every 28 day) for a total of 6 cycles in fludarabine-refractory CLL. The primary endpoint was overall response rate according to the IWCLL'08 criteria. 20 patients were enrolled: 18 completed at least one cycle of treatment of which 67% finished at least 2 cycles of combination treatment. 3 of these 18 patients reached a formal PR (16.7%). Majority of patients obtained some reduction in lymph node (LN) size. Most frequent toxicity was related to myelosuppression. NF-κB RNA expression levels of circulating CLL cells decreased whereas the levels of pro-apoptotic NOXA increased during treatment. In conclusion, dasatinib/fludarabine combination has modest clinical efficacy in fludarabine-refractory patients.

Plasma concentrations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, erlotinib, and sunitinib in routine clinical outpatient cancer care.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the plasma concentrations of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), imatinib, erlotinib, and sunitinib, in a cohort of patients with cancer in routine clinical practice and to find the possible factors related to plasma concentrations below the target level. METHODS: An observational study was performed in an unselected cohort of patients using TKIs for cancer treatment. Randomly timed plasma samples were drawn together with regular laboratory investigations during routine outpatient clinic visits. The plasma concentrations of TKIs were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry detection method. Trough concentrations were estimated using the interval between the last dose intake and blood sampling and the mean elimination half-life of the TKIs and were compared with target trough concentrations. Outpatient medical records were reviewed to collect data on patient- and medication-related factors that could have contributed to the variation in TKI plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Only 26.8%, 88.9%, and 51.4% of the calculated trough plasma concentrations of imatinib, erlotinib, and sunitinib samples, respectively, reached the predefined target concentration (imatinib: 1100 ng/mL, erlotinib: 500 ng/mL, and sunitinib: 50 ng/mL). Interpatient variability was high with coefficients of variation of 39.1%, 40.1%, and 29.2% for imatinib, erlotinib, and sunitinib, respectively. High variation in plasma concentrations could only partly be explained by patient- or medication related factors. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the plasma concentrations in the outpatient population seemed to be below the target level with a risk of treatment failure. It is not possible to predict which patients are at a risk of plasma concentrations below the target level based on patient- or medication-related factors. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring could play a crucial role in routine cancer care to identify patients that are in need of individual adjusted dosages. Further research is required to investigate the safety and efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring.

The effect of seasonal variation and secretion of sunitinib in sweat on the development of hand-foot syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a side effect of sunitinib with considerable impact on quality of life. Seasonal variation and hyperhydrosis are possibly correlated to occurrence of HFS. Therefore, we proposed to study the prevalence of HFS in different seasons retrospectively and to study the relationship between sunitinib sweat secretion and HFS prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 19 patients treated with sunitinib was used to determine seasonal prevalence of HFS. In a prospective study, sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib levels in sweat patches of 25 patients treated with sunitinib were quantified and correlated to severity of HFS. RESULTS: In the retrospective cohort, the patients suffered from more severe HFS during summertime compared with the rest of the year. In the prospective study, the cumulative amounts of sunitinib plus metabolite measured in the patches of the on-treatment phase (median 129.4 ng/patch) were higher than the off-treatment phase (median 39.5 ng/patch). A tendency was observed towards increasing amounts of drug per patch with increasing severity of HFS. CONCLUSION: Patients experienced more HFS in summer time compared to other seasons. However, no statistically significant correlation between sunitinib sweat secretion and severity of HFS could be demonstrated within our patient cohort.

Quantification of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib in human EDTA plasma by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry: validation and application in routine therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Given the low therapeutic index, the large interindividual variability in systemic exposure and the positive exposure-efficacy relationship of sunitinib, there is a rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sunitinib. To support TDM, a method for determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite (N-desethyl sunitinib) has been developed and validated. METHODS: For determination of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib in human EDTA plasma samples, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was used. Validation experiments according to Food and Drug Administration guidelines were performed. In addition, the results of 25 analytical runs with 58 patient samples using 8 calibrators and 3 levels of quality control (QC) samples per analysis were compared with the results of analyses using only 3 calibrators and 1 QC sample to accelerate sample turnaround time. The method comparison experiment was performed according to international guidelines. RESULTS: The HPLC-MS/MS method was validated over a linear range from 2.5 to 500 ng/mL using 50 µL plasma volumes, with good intra- and interassay accuracy and precision. In addition, the mean of the absolute differences between the compared methods was only -0.66 ng/mL (mean of relative differences, -0.85%), which is not a clinically relevant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This method has been applied successfully for routine TDM purposes for patients treated with sunitinib. Moreover, reliable results with a rapid turnaround time were obtained when performing a short analytical run containing only 3 calibrators and 1 QC sample.

P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) restrict brain accumulation of the active sunitinib metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib.

N-desethyl sunitinib is a major and pharmacologically active metabolite of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor and anticancer drug sunitinib. Because the combination of N-desethyl sunitinib and sunitinib represents total active drug exposure, we investigated the impact of several multidrug efflux transporters on plasma pharmacokinetics and brain accumulation of N-desethyl sunitinib after sunitinib administration to wild-type and transporter knockout mice. In vitro, N-desethyl sunitinib was a good transport substrate of human ABCB1 and ABCG2 and murine Abcg2, but not ABCC2 or Abcc2. At 5 µM, ABCB1 and ABCG2 contributed almost equally to N-desethyl sunitinib transport. In vivo, the systemic exposure of N-desethyl sunitinib after oral dosing of sunitinib malate (10 mg/kg) was unchanged when Abcb1 and/or Abcg2 were absent. However, brain accumulation of N-desethyl sunitinib was markedly increased (13.7-fold) in Abcb1a/1b(-/-)/Abcg2(-/-) mice, but not in Abcb1a/1b(-/-) or Abcg2(-/-) mice. In the absence of the ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar, brain concentrations of N-desethyl sunitinib were detectable only in Abcb1a/1b(-/-)/Abcg2(-/-) mice after sunitinib administration. Combined elacridar plus N-desethyl sunitinib treatment increased N-desethyl sunitinib plasma and brain exposures, but not brain-to-plasma ratios in wild-type mice. In conclusion, brain accumulation of N-desethyl sunitinib is effectively restricted by both Abcb1 and Abcg2. The effect of elacridar treatment in improving brain accumulation of N-desethyl sunitinib in wild-type mice was limited compared with its effect on sunitinib brain accumulation.

Brain accumulation of sunitinib is restricted by P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) and can be enhanced by oral elacridar and sunitinib coadministration.

Sunitinib is an orally active, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has been used for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We aimed to investigate the in vivo roles of the ATP-binding cassette drug efflux transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2 in plasma pharmacokinetics and brain accumulation of oral sunitinib, and the feasibility of improving sunitinib kinetics using oral coadministration of the dual ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar. We used in vitro transport assays and Abcb1a/1b(-/-) , Abcg2(-/-) and Abcb1a/1b/Abcg2(-/-) mice to study the roles of ABCB1 and ABCG2 in sunitinib disposition. In vitro, sunitinib was a good substrate of murine (mu)ABCG2 and a moderate substrate of human (hu)ABCB1 and huABCG2. In vivo, the systemic exposure of sunitinib after oral dosing (10 mg kg(-1) ) was unchanged when muABCB1 and/or muABCG2 were absent. Brain accumulation of sunitinib was markedly (23-fold) increased in Abcb1a/b/Abcg2(-/-) mice, but only slightly (2.3-fold) in Abcb1a/b(-/-) mice, and not in Abcg2(-/-) mice. Importantly, a clinically realistic coadministration of oral elacridar and oral sunitinib to wild-type mice resulted in markedly increased sunitinib brain accumulation, equaling levels in Abcb1a/1b/Abcg2(-/-) mice. This indicates complete inhibition of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) transporters. High-dose intravenous sunitinib could saturate BBB muABCG2, but not muABCB1A, illustrating a dose-dependent relative impact of the BBB transporters. Brain accumulation of sunitinib is effectively restricted by both muABCB1 and muABCG2 activity. Complete inhibition of both transporters, leading to markedly increased brain accumulation of sunitinib, is feasible and safe with a clinically realistic oral elacridar/sunitinib coadministration.

Determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib in sweat of a patient.

Skin reactions are side effects of sunitinib therapy with an adverse impact on quality of life often necessitating dose reductions. For conventional antineoplastic agents, such as doxorubicin, previous studies have indicated a possible relationship between sweat excretion and the development of skin toxicity. However, the determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite in sweat has not yet been reported. A sensitive and accurate method for the determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib in human sweat was developed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS-MS). Sweat samples of a patient treated with sunitinib were collected using Pharmchek™ Drugs of Abuse patches to determine cumulative amounts of sunitinib and metabolite. Validation of the LC-MS-MS method was performed over a range from 1.0 to 200 ng/patch with good intra- and interassay accuracies for sunitinib and N-desethylsunitinib. Ranges of 76-119 and 7.9-10.5 ng/patch for cumulative secretion of sunitinib and metabolite, respectively, were found in patient samples. To our knowledge, this is the first method for determination of cumulative secretion of sunitinib and N-desethylsunitinib in human sweat samples. Sunitinib and its metabolite were easily detectable in sweat patches of a patient treated with sunitinib.

Erlotinib and pantoprazole: a relevant interaction or not?

AIMS: There is increasing evidence that erlotinib exposure correlates well with treatment outcome. In this report we present a case of therapeutic drug monitoring of erlotinib in a patient with a gastric ulcer, treated with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole. This agent may cause an unwanted, but not always unavoidable, interaction since absorption of erlotinib is pH dependent. METHODS: Erlotinib trough concentrations were monitored in a patient during treatment with orally and intravenously administered pantoprazole. RESULTS: Erlotinib trough concentrations were diminished during high dose intravenously administered pantoprazole, but returned to normal when the dose was reduced and pantoprazole was administered orally. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to assess the dose dependency of the interaction between pantoprazole and erlotinib. Furthermore, we advise to monitor closely erlotinib plasma concentrations and adjust the erlotinib dose accordingly when a clinically relevant interaction is suspected and no proper dosing guidelines are available.

Phase 1 study of combination treatment with PTK 787/ZK 222584 and cetuximab for patients with advanced solid tumors: safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics analysis.

INTRODUCTION: PTK/ZK is a small-molecule inhibitor of all three vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, and cytokine stem cell factor receptor. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. Combining inhibition of VEGF and EGF signaling might act additive or synergistically. METHODS: In phase 1 design, patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with PTK/ZK daily (cohort 1, 750 mg once daily; cohort 2, 1250 mg once daily; cohort 3, 250 mg [morning] and 500 mg [evening]; and cohort 4, 500 mg [morning] and 750 mg [evening]) in combination with cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) weekly in cycles of 28 days in cohorts of three patients. Toxicity was evaluated conform the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification 3.0. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics consisting of circulating endothelial (progenitor) cell (CE[P]C) analysis by flow cytometry were performed. RESULTS: Safety and tolerability was evaluated in 16 patients. The most frequently reported adverse events were acne, dry skin, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, headache, and diarrhea. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred in cohort 3 consisting of a grade 3 transaminitis. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed no significant changes in PTK/ZK exposure on coadministration with cetuximab and in bioavailability at equivalent total daily doses. Biomarker analysis showed no significant change in the number of CE(P)Cs during treatment. One of 14 evaluable patients showed a partial response for at least 11.5 months, and 7 patients (50%) stable disease for at least 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the combination of PTK/ZK and cetuximab is well tolerated with only slightly overlapping toxicity profiles and has antitumor activity.