Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled, Three-Month Clinical Trial on the Evaluation and Treatment of the Ocular Surface Damage Following Phacoemulsification.

Background: To determine efficacy of two lacrimal substitutes on signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease after phacoemulsification; to determine impact of surgery on patients' vision related quality of life. Monocentric, randomised, physician blinded, three parallel groups clinical trial. Design and Methods: Patients in the operative list for phacoemulsification have been screened for eligibility; they underwent (at time 0, 15, 45 and 90 days): slit lamp examination; tear film break-up time (BUT); corneal staining; tear volume; 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ); Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Treatments to be compared were: 1. standard of care-SOC (lomefloxacine and tobramicine/dexamethasone fixed combination 4 times a day for 2 weeks), 2. SOC + carboxymethylcellulose sodium 0.5% and glycerin 0.9%, 3. SOC + Sodium Hyaluronate 0.15%. Study treatment started at T15. Groups were compared with parametric or nonparametric tests, and with Pearson's χ2 test. Correlation between continuous variables was assessed by means of Pearson's or Spearman's coefficient. Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. At 45 and at 90 days from surgery, the group receiving lacrimal substitutes presented better BUT and Schirmer I test (p = 0.009, <0.001, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively); dry eye presence showed significant difference by group at time 90 (p = 0.019). General vision, near activity and vision-specific dependency subscales improved after surgery (p = <0.001, 0.004 and 0.048, respectively). At 45 and 90 days from surgery, the OSDI score significantly changed (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Cataract surgery causes the onset or the worsening of dry eye. Use of artificial tears can significantly reduce symptoms and signs of dry eye in patients after phacoemulsification.

Proton Beam Therapy for Iris Melanomas in 107 Patients.

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with iris melanoma using proton therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven patients with iris melanoma from 3 regional ophthalmologic centers. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for iris melanoma patients from 3 regional ophthalmologic centers referred to and treated at a single proton therapy facility between 1996 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At each follow-up visit, examinations included measurement of best-corrected VA, slit-lamp, examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 49.5 months, 5 of 107 patients experienced a local relapse within a median of 36.3 months. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 7.5% at 5 years. All 5 patients showed involvement of the iridocorneal angle (P = 0.056). Diffuse iris melanoma showed a higher risk of relapse (P = 0.044). Four patients showed out-of-field relapse and 1 showed angular relapse. Three patients were retreated with proton therapy, whereas 2 other patients, one with T1b disease and another with diffuse T3 disease, underwent secondary enucleation. None of the patients experienced metastases nor died of iris melanoma. Vision improved in 59.4% of patients (n = 60/101). However, cataracts occurred in 57.4% of the 54 patients (n = 31) without cataract or implant at diagnosis. Secondary glaucoma was reported in 7.6% of the patients (n = 8), uveitis in 4.7% (n = 5), and hyphema in 3.7% (n = 4). All but 5 cases of complications were mild, transient, and not sight limiting after treatment. Five cases of glaucoma, including 1 with uveitis, were severe and associated with visual deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy showed efficacy and limited morbidity in iris melanomas.

Dry Eye Syndrome After Proton Therapy of Ocular Melanomas.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether proton therapy (PT) performs safely in superotemporal melanomas, in terms of risk of dry-eye syndrome (DES). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor location, DES grade, and dose to ocular structures were analyzed in patients undergoing PT (2005-2015) with 52 Gy (prescribed dose, not accounting for biologic effectiveness correction of 1.1). Prognostic factors of DES and severe DES (sDES, grades 2-3) were determined with Cox proportional hazard models. Visual acuity deterioration and enucleation rates were compared by sDES and tumor locations. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (interquartile range, 18-60 months). Of 853 patients (mean age, 64 years), 30.5% had temporal and 11.4% superotemporal tumors. Five-year incidence of DES and sDES was 23.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.0%-27.7%) and 10.9% (95% CI 8.2%-14.4%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed a higher risk for sDES in superotemporal (hazard ratio [HR] 5.82, 95% CI 2.72-12.45) and temporal tumors (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.28-5.42), age ≥70 years (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.09-3.32), distance to optic disk ≥5 mm (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.52-4.84), ≥35% of retina receiving 12 Gy (HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.54-5.77), and eyelid rim irradiation (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.49-4.80). The same risk factors were found for DES. Visual acuity deteriorated more in patients with sDES (0.86 ± 1.10 vs 0.64 ± 0.98 logMAR, P=.034) but not between superotemporal/temporal and other locations (P=.890). Enucleation rates were independent of sDES (P=.707) and tumor locations (P=.729). CONCLUSIONS: Severe DES was more frequent in superotemporal/temporal melanomas. Incidence of vision deterioration and enucleation was no higher in patients with superotemporal melanoma than in patients with tumors in other locations. Tumor location should not contraindicate PT.

Risk factors to develop ocular surface disease in treated glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for developing ocular surface disease (OSD), to verify the prevalence of OSD, and to record efficacy of questionnaires in identifying symptoms' impact on patients' quality of life.
 METHODS: . This was an observational, cross-sectional study of patients with topically treated glaucoma. Tear film break-up time (TFBUT) and punctate keratitis were evaluated; 2 quality-of-life questionnaires (National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire 25 and Glaucoma Symptom Scale) were submitted to all patients. Class of previous and current intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering drugs, number of drugs, number of drops/day, and total and current benzalkonium chloride (BAK) exposure were collected.
 RESULTS: . A total of 233 patients completed the study. TFBUT was abnormal in 71 (30.5%) eyes; punctate keratitis was present in 74 (31.7%). Keratitis was more frequent with increasing number of eyedrops (p=0.008) and number of instillations per day (p=0.009). Ocular surface disease was present in 97 (41.6%) patients and was statistically related to number of medications used (p=0.026). The univariate analysis pointed out that patients with OSD were older (p=0.04), had lower IOP values (p=0.03), were topically treated for more time (p<0.0001), had assumed more BAK (p<0.0001), and presented worst quality of life (p<0.01). The multivariate analysis found that OSD was related to number of medications used (p=0.002), prolonged use of preserved medications (p=0.005), and total BAK exposure (p<0.001).
 CONCLUSIONS: There is clinical evidence that the number of medications, their prolonged use, and the total BAK exposure are risk factors to develop OSD in patients with glaucoma. To prevent OSD onset, BAK exposure and the number of topical medications should be reduced.

The Italian version of the Glaucoma Symptom Scale Questionnaire: translation, validation, and reliability.

PURPOSE: To validate the Italian version of the Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) Questionnaire and its symptoms and function subscales. METHODS: This transversal validation study enrolled nonhospitalized patients with glaucoma, and a reference sample of patients without eye diseases. Eligible participants had to be cognitively able to respond to a health status interview. The Italian self-administered versions of the 25-item National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire and the GSS Questionnaire were administered to all participants. Reliability and validity of the Italian translation of the GSS Questionnaire were tested using standard statistical methods for questionnaire validation. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were enrolled. Cronbach α coefficient ranged from 0.72 to 0.92 across subscales and eyes. Test-retest stability was >85% for each subscale and eye. The control group of participants had better scale scores across all dimensions of vision-targeted health-related quality of life captured by the GSS Questionnaire (P<0.05) and there were good correlations between responses GSS Questionnaire subscales and analogous domains of the 25-item National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the GSS Questionnaire has good validity, discriminatory power, internal consistence and reliability, showing psychometric properties comparable with those of the English version, and can therefore be used in clinical research as a specific measure of vision-related quality of life in Italian-speaking patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.