Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0137267, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26340002

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) is sometimes used for difficult births, but whether it contributes to postpartum pelvic muscle disorder is unclear. This randomized controlled trial examined whether CSEA given during labor affects the electrophysiological index of postpartum pelvic floor muscle function. METHODS: A consecutive sample of primiparous women who delivered vaginally at term were randomly assigned to a CSEA group (n = 143) and control group (n = 142) between June 2013 and June 2014. All were assessed 6-8 weeks later for electrophysiological function of pelvic floor muscle. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in the degree of muscle strength, muscle fatigue, and pelvic dynamic pressure of pelvic floor muscle. The CSEA and control groups showed similar proportions of women with normal muscle strength (score ≥4) in type I pelvic fibers (23.1% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.051) and type II pelvic fibers (28.0% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.524). The groups also contained similar proportions of women who showed no fatigue in type I fibers (54.5% vs. 48.6%, P = 0.315) or type II fibers (88.8% vs. 87.3%, P = 0.699). Similarly low proportions of women in the CSEA group and control group showed normal pelvic dynamic pressure (11.2% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.321). However, women in the CSEA group spent significantly less time in labor than those in the control group (7.25 vs. 9.52 h, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CSEA did not affect the risk of postpartum pelvic muscle disorder in this cohort of primiparous women who gave birth vaginally. A significant shorter duration of labour was observed in the CSEA-group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02334150.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Fadiga Muscular , Diafragma da Pelve/fisiologia , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eletrofisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/fisiologia , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Paridade , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Sufentanil
2.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 10(5): 516-20, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21947726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although low central venous pressure (CVP) has been used to minimize blood loss during hepatectomy, the impact of variations of CVP on the rate of blood loss and on the perfusion of end-organs has not been evaluated. This animal study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamics and oxygen transport changes during hepatic resection at different CVP levels. METHODS: Forty-eight anesthetized Bama miniature pigs were divided into 8 groups with CVP during hepatic resection controlled at 0 to <1, 1 to <2, 2 to <3, 3 to <4, 4 to <5, 5 to <6, 6 to <7, and 7 to <8 cmH2O. Intergroup comparisons were made for hemodynamic parameters, oxygen transport dynamics, and the rate of blood loss. RESULTS: The rate of blood loss and the hepatic venous pressure during hepatic resection were almost linearly related to the CVP. A significant drop in the mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index occurred between CVP ≥2 and <2 cmH2O. Oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen consumption (VO2) and oxygen extraction ratio (ERO2) remained relatively constant between CVPs of 2 to <8 cmH2O. There was a significant drop in DO2 when the CVP was <2 cmH2O. There was also a significant drop in VO2 and ExO2 when the CVP was <1 cmH2O. CONCLUSION: The optimal CVP for hepatic resection is 2 to 3 cmH2O.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Pressão Venosa Central , Hemodinâmica , Hepatectomia/métodos , Oxigênio/sangue , Animais , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Feminino , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Modelos Animais , Consumo de Oxigênio , Suínos , Porco Miniatura , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...