Sunitinib efficacy with minimal toxicity in patient-derived retinoblastoma organoids.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of retinoblastoma (RB) following chemoreduction is common and is often managed with local (intra-arterial/intravitreal) chemotherapy. However, some tumors are resistant to even local administration of maximum feasible drug dosages, or effective tumor control and globe preservation may be achieved at the cost of vision loss due to drug-induced retinal toxicity. The aim of this study was to identify drugs with improved antitumor activity and more favorable retinal toxicity profiles via screening of potentially repurposable FDA-approved drugs in patient-derived tumor organoids. METHODS: Genomic profiling of five RB organoids and the corresponding parental tissues was performed. RB organoids were screened with 133 FDA-approved drugs, and candidate drugs were selected based on cytotoxicity and potency. RNA sequencing was conducted to generate a drug signature from RB organoids, and the effects of drugs on cell cycle progression and proliferative tumor cone restriction were examined. Drug toxicity was assessed with human embryonic stem cell-derived normal retinal organoids. The efficacy/toxicity profiles of candidate drugs were compared with those of drugs in clinical use. RESULTS: RB organoids maintained the genomic features of the parental tumors. Sunitinib was identified as highly cytotoxic against both classical RB1-deficient and novel MYCN-amplified RB organoids and inhibited proliferation while inducing differentiation in RB. Sunitinib was a more effective suppressor of proliferative tumor cones in RB organoids and had lower toxicity in normal retinal organoids than either melphalan or topotecan. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and retinal toxicity profiles of sunitinib suggest that it could potentially be repurposed for local chemotherapy of RB.

Silencing of the Long Noncoding RNA MYCNOS1 Suppresses Activity of MYCN-Amplified Retinoblastoma Without RB1 Mutation.

Purpose: MYCNOS (MYCN opposite strand) is co-amplified with MYCN in pediatric cancers, including retinoblastoma. MYCNOS encodes several RNA variants whose functions have not been elucidated in retinoblastoma. Thus, we attempted to identify MYCNOS variants in retinoblastoma and aimed to decipher the role of MYCNOS variant 1 (MYCNOS1) on the activity of MYCN-amplified retinoblastoma. Methods: The profiles of MYCNOS variants and MYCN status were determined in 17 retinoblastoma tissues, cell lines, retinas, and retinal organoids. A functional study of MYCNOS1 expression was conducted in patient-derived tumor cells and in retinoblastoma cell lines via short hairpin RNA-mediated gene silencing. We carried out MYCN expression, cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, soft agar colony formation, and transwell assays to examine the role of MYCNOS1 in MYCN and cell behaviors. We analyzed a transcriptome of MYCN-amplified retinoblastoma cells deficient for MYCNOS1 and, finally, tested the responses of these cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Results: Expression of MYCNOS1 was associated with the expression and copy number of MYCN. Knockdown of MYCNOS1 caused instability of the MYCN protein, leading to cell cycle arrest and impaired proliferation and chemotaxis-directed migration in MYCN-amplified retinoblastoma cells in which RB1 was intact. MYCNOS1 expression was associated with gene signatures of photoreceptor cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. MYCNOS1 silencing enhanced the response of retinoblastoma cells to topotecan but not carboplatin. Conclusions: MYCNOS1 supports progression of retinoblastoma. Inhibition of MYCNOS1 expression may be necessary to suppress MYCN activity when treating MYCN-amplified cancers without RB1 mutation.