Metabolic active tumour volume quantified on [18F]FDG PET/CT further stratifies TNM stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess whether the whole body metabolic active tumour volume (MTVWB), quantified on staging [18F]FDG PET/CT, could further stratify stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: A group of 160 stage IV NSCLC patients, submitted to staging [18F]FDG PET/CT between July 2010 and May 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. MTVWB was quantified. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were carried out to assess correlation with overall survival (OS). C-statistic was used to test predictive power. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with Log-Rank tests were performed to compute statistical differences between strata from dichotomized variables and to calculate the estimated mean survival times (EMST). Survival rates at 1 and 5 years were calculated. RESULTS: MTVWB was a statistically significant predictor of OS on univariate (p < 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.0001). The multivariate model with MTVWB (Cindex ± SE = 0.657 ± 0.024) worked significantly better as an OS predictor than the cTNM model (Cindex ± SE = 0.544 ± 0.028) (p = 0.003). An EMST of 29.207 ± 3.627(95% CI 22.099-36.316) months and an EMST of 10.904 ± 1.171(95% CI 8.609-13.199) months (Log-Rank p < 0.0001) were determined for patients with MTVWB < 104.3 and MTVWB ≥ 104.3, respectively. In subsamples of stage IVA (cut-off point = 114.5) and IVB patients (cut-off point = 191.1), statistically significant differences between EMST were also reported, with p-values of 0.0001 and 0.0002, respectively. In both substages and in the entire cohort, patients with MTVWB ≥ cut-off points had lower EMST and survival rates. CONCLUSION: Baseline MTVWB, measured on staging [18F]FDG PET/CT, further stratifies stage IV NSCLC patients. This parameter is an independent predictor of OS and provides valuable prognostic information over the 8th edition of cTNM staging.

Metabolic tumor burden quantified on [18F]FDG PET/CT improves TNM staging of lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to test a new staging algorithm, combining clinical TNM staging (cTNM) with whole-body metabolic active tumor volume (MATV-WB), with the goal of improving prognostic ability and stratification power. METHODS: Initial staging [18F]FDG PET/CT of 278 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, performed between January/2011 and April/2016, 74(26.6%) women, 204(73.4%) men; aged 34-88 years (mean ± SD:66 ± 10), was retrospectively evaluated, and MATV-WB was quantified. Each patient's follow-up time was recorded: 0.7-83.6 months (mean ± SD:25.1 ± 20.3). RESULTS: MATV-WB was an independent and statistically-significant predictor of overall survival (p < 0.001). The overall survival predictive ability of MATV-WB (C index: mean ± SD = 0.7071 ± 0.0009) was not worse than cTNM (C index: mean ± SD = 0.7031 ± 0.007) (Z = -0.143, p = 0.773). Estimated mean survival times of 56.3 ± 3.0 (95%CI:50.40-62.23) and 21.7 ± 2.2 months (95%CI:17.34-25.98) (Log-Rank = 77.48, p < 0.001), one-year survival rate of 86.8% and of 52.8%, and five-year survival rate of 53.6% and no survivors, were determined, respectively, for patients with MATV-WB < 49.5 and MATV-WB ≥ 49.5. Patients with MATV-WB ≥ 49.5 had a mortality risk 2.9-5.8 times higher than those with MATV-WB < 49.5 (HR = 4.12, p < 0.001). MATV-WB cutoff points were also determined for each cTNM stage: 23.7(I), 49.5(II), 52(III), 48.8(IV) (p = 0.029, p = 0.227, p = 0.025 and p = 0.001, respectively). At stages I, III and IV there was a statistically-significant difference in the estimated mean overall survival time between groups of patients defined by the cutoff points (p = 0.007, p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). At stage II (p = 0.365), there was a clinically-significant difference of about 12 months between the groups. In all cTNM stages, patients with MATV-WB ≥ cutoff points had lower survival rates. Combined clinical TNM-PET staging (cTNM-P) was then tested: Stage I < 23.7; Stage I ≥ 23.7; Stage II < 49.5; Stage II ≥ 49.5; Stage III < 52; Stage III ≥ 52; Stage IV < 48.8; Stage IV ≥ 48.8. cTNM-P staging presented a superior overall survival predictive ability (C index = 0.730) compared with conventional cTNM staging (C index = 0.699) (Z = -4.49, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: cTNM-P staging has superior prognostic value compared with conventional cTNM staging, and allows better stratification of NSCLC patients.

[Superiority of 18F-FNa PET/CT for Detecting Bone Metastases in Comparison with Other Diagnostic Imaging Modalities]. / Superioridade da PET/CT com FNa-F18 na Deteção de Metástases Ósseas quando Comparada com Outros Métodos de Diagnóstico por Imagem.

INTRODUCTION: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography is being considered as an excellent imaging modality for bone metastases detection. This ability was compared with other imaging techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 114 patients who underwent 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/ computed tomography. Of these, 49 patients also had bone scintigraphy, 61 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and 10 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography. We identified the technique that detected the largest number of bone metastases. For the detection of skeletal metastases with the 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography study, the contribution of the positron emission tomography component was compared with the contribution of the computed tomography component. Cases in which 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy required further additional tests for diagnosis clarification were registered. RESULTS: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography was superior to bone scintigraphy in 49% of the patients (p < 0.001); it was superior to 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 59% of the patients (p < 0.001) and it was superior to 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 40% of the patients (p < 0.001). None of the compared imaging techniques were superior to 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The positron emission tomography component was superior to computed tomography in 35% of the cases (p < 0.001). Further investigation was suggested in only 3.5% of patients who underwent 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography (45% for bone scintigraphy) (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: As with other authors, our experience also confirms that 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography is an excellent imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases, detecting lesions in more patients and more lesions per patient. CONCLUSION: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed a superior ability for the detection of bone metastases when compared with bone scintigraphy, 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Introdução: A tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18 vem sendo considerada como uma modalidade imagiológica com vantagens na pesquisa de metastização óssea. Comparámos a sua capacidade para deteção de metástases ósseas com a de outras técnicas imagiológicas.Material e Métodos: Avaliámos retrospetivamente 114 doentes que realizaram tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18. Destes, 49 realizaram também cintigrafia óssea, 61 tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FDG-F18 e 10 tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FCH-F18. Identificámos a técnica que detetou um maior número de metástases ósseas. Comparámos ainda a tomografia por emissão de positrões com a componente tomografia computorizada da tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18. Registámos as situações  nas quais a tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada FNa-F18 e a cintigrafia óssea necessitaram de exames adicionais para esclarecimento complementar.Resultados: A tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18 foi superior à cintigrafia óssea em 49% dos doentes (p < 0,001); foi superior à tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FDG-F18 em 59% dos doentes (p < 0,001) e foi superior à tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FCH-F18 em 40% dos doentes (p < 0,001). Nenhuma das técnicas imagiológicas avaliadas lhe foi superior. Na tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada -FNa-F18 a componente tomografia por emissão de positrões foi superior à tomografia computorizada em 35% dos casos (p < 0,001). Foi sugerida investigação complementar em apenas 3,5% dos doentes que realizaram tomografia por emissão de positrões/ tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18 (45% para a cintigrafia óssea) (p < 0,001).Discussão: Em conformidade com o referido por outros autores, a nossa experiência confirma que a tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18 tem excelente desempenho na deteção de metástases ósseas, sendo capaz de identificar lesões em mais doentes, e em maior número, quando comparada com outras técnicas imagiológicas.Conclusão: A tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FNa-F18 revelou superioridade na deteção de metástases ósseas comparativamente à cintigrafia óssea, à tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FDG-F18 e à tomografia por emissão de positrões/tomografia computorizada - FCH- F18.

Assessment of skeletal tumour burden on 18F-NaF PET/CT using a new quantitative method.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a method of quantifying skeletal tumour burden with F-NaF PET/CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 117 patients who underwent F-NaF PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases, 68 women and 49 men, 16-82 years old (mean±SD: 62.9±10.7 years). Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were measured in five anatomic sites to evaluate normal skeleton activity. The influence of sex and age was investigated. Skeletal tumour burden was calculated in 69 exams positive for bone metastases using volumetric data and SUVmean values. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was tested. In 10 patients with breast cancer, skeletal tumour burden in pretreatment and post-treatment F-NaF PET/CT was compared with tumour marker and clinical evolution. RESULTS: The range of normal skeleton SUVmean for the 410 volume of interests analysed was 2.2-5.9 (mean±SD: 4.4±1.5). A threshold of 10 was chosen to exclude F-NaF normal skeleton uptake. An inverse relationship was found between normal skeleton SUVmean and age (r=-0.237; P=0.032). Our results show excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility, with intraclass correlation values of 0.995 and 0.997, respectively. The percentage change in the skeletal tumour burden in response to therapy shows a moderate direct correlation with the percentage variation of the tumour marker (r=0.668; P=0.035). CONCLUSION: The methodology that we used to quantify skeletal tumour burden is easy to perform, highly reproducible and allows for the evaluation of bone tumour response to therapy in a subgroup of breast cancer patients. The possibility of skeletal tumour burden quantification is another advantage of F-NaF PET/CT over the visual and subjective interpretation of bone scintigraphy.

[PET/CT with 18F-Fluorocholine in Patients with Prostatic Cancer in Biochemical Recurrence]. / PET/CT com Fluorocolina-F18 em Doentes com Carcinoma da Próstata em Recidiva Bioquímica.

INTRODUCTION: In prostate cancer, after therapy with curative intent, biochemical recurrence frequently occurs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine in restaging these patients and in their orientation, and to analyze the effect of the risk stratification, the values of PSA and the hormone suppression therapy, in the technique sensitivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 107 patients with prostate carcinoma in biochemical recurrence who underwent PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine in our hospital, between December 2009 and May 2014. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was 63.2% and 80.0% when PSA > 2 ng/mL. It was possible to identify distant disease in 28% of the patients. The sensitivity increased from 40.0%, in patients with low and intermediate risk, to 55.2% in high-risk patients. Without hormonal suppression therapy, the sensitivity was 61.8%, while in the group under this therapy, was 67.7%. DISCUSSION: PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine provided important information even in patients with low levels of PSA, however, with significantly increased sensitivity in patients with PSA > 2 ng/mL. Sensitivity was higher in high-risk patients compared with low and intermediate risk patients, however, without a statistically significant difference. The hormone suppression therapy does not appear to influence uptake of 18F-fluorocholine in patients resistant to castration. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PET/CT with 18F-Fluorocholine showed good results in restaging patients with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence, distinguishing between loco regional and systemic disease, information with important consequences in defining the therapeutic strategy.

Introdução: No carcinoma da próstata, é frequente, após terapêutica com intuito curativo, ocorrer recidiva bioquímica. O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o impacto da PET/CT com fluorocolina-F18 no restadiamento e orientação destes doentes e analisar a influência, da estratificação de risco, dos valores do PSA e da terapêutica de supressão hormonal, na sensibilidade da técnica. Material e Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de 107 doentes com carcinoma da próstata em recidiva bioquímica que realizaram PET/CT com fluorocolina-F18 no nosso hospital, entre dezembro de 2009 e maio de 2014. Resultados: A sensibilidade global foi de 63,2% sendo 80,0% quando PSA > 2 ng/mL. Foi possível identificar doença à distância em 28% dos doentes. A sensibilidade aumentou de 40,0% em doentes de risco baixo e intermédio para 55,2% em doentes de alto risco. Sem terapêutica de supressão hormonal, a sensibilidade foi de 61,8% enquanto no grupo sob essa terapêutica, foi de 67,7%. Discussão: A PET/CT com fluorocolina-F18 forneceu informações relevantes, mesmo em doentes com baixos valores do PSA, contudo, com incremento significativo da sensibilidade nos doentes com PSA >2 ng/mL. A sensibilidade foi superior nos doentes de alto risco comparativamente com os de risco baixo e intermédio, contudo, sem uma diferença estatisticamente significativa. A terapêutica de supressão hormonal parece não influenciar a captação de Fluorocolina-F18 nos doentes resistentes à castração. Conclusões: Neste estudo, a PET/CT com fluorocolina-F18 apresentou bons resultados no restadiamento de doentes com carcinoma da próstata em recidiva bioquímica, distinguindo entre doença loco-regional e sistémica, informação com importantes consequências na definição da estratégia terapêutica.

Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for evaluation of malignancy: results of an international multicenter trial.

UNLABELLED: (18)F-FDG PET/CT is used in a variety of cancers, but because of variable rates of glucose metabolism, not all cancers are reliably identified. (18)F(-) PET/CT allows for the acquisition of highly sensitive and specific images of the skeleton. We prospectively evaluated combined (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG as a single PET/CT examination for evaluation of cancer patients and compared it with separate (18)F(-) PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. METHODS: One hundred fifteen participants with cancer were prospectively enrolled in an international multicenter trial evaluating (18)F(-) PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and combined (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG PET/CT. The 3 PET/CT scans were performed sequentially within 4 wk of one another for each patient. RESULTS: (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG PET/CT allowed for accurate interpretation of radiotracer uptake outside the skeleton, with findings similar to those of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. In 19 participants, skeletal disease was more extensive on (18)F(-) PET/CT and (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG PET/CT than on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. In another 29 participants, (18)F(-) PET/CT and (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG PET/CT showed osseous metastases where (18)F-FDG PET/CT was negative. The extent of skeletal lesions was similar in 18 participants on all 3 scans. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that combined (18)F(-)/(18)F-FDG PET/CT shows promising results when compared with separate (18)F(-) PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of cancer patients. This result opens the possibility for improved patient care and reduction in health-care costs, as will be further evaluated in future trials.