FOXP3-enriched infiltrates associated with better outcome in renal allografts with inflamed fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: FOXP3-expressing regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a crucial role in maintaining allogeneic transplant tolerance in experimental models. In clinical transplantation, there are few data about their role in chronic inflammation. We hypothesized that Tregs might accumulate within the graft since enrichment of Tregs has been frequently described in chronically inflamed tissues. METHODS: Sixty-seven biopsies, indicated by a rise in creatinine level, were studied. Thirty-four biopsies showing acute T-cell-mediated rejection and 33 displaying inflamed fibrosis were selected. Tregs frequency was calculated for each infiltrate by counting FOXP3+ and CD3+ cells on two contiguous serial sections. RESULTS: A total of 121 infiltrates were scored with a mean of 309 CD3+ cells per infiltrate (range: 50-700). Tregs were enriched within allografts exhibiting inflamed fibrosis versus acute cellular rejection (10.6 +/- 6.8% versus 5.5 +/- 2.6%, respectively, P = 0.005). In those with inflammation within scarred areas, the subset of patients with a low FOXP3/CD3 ratio (below the median value) displayed a lower frequency of B-cell-enriched nodular cell clusters (20% versus 86%, P = 0.001) and had a significantly lower graft survival (log-rank, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the low FOXP3/CD3 ratio remained an independent indicator of outcome (P = 0.03). Consistently, the FOXP3+/IL-17+ cell ratio was higher in nodular than in diffuse infiltrates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Tregs may dampen the graft injury in chronic (versus acute) inflammation and stress the importance of devising strategies to enhance Tregs efficiency.

Mortality risk among children admitted in a large-scale nutritional program in Niger, 2006.

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Médecins sans Frontières nutritional program in the region of Maradi (Niger) included 68,001 children 6-59 months of age with either moderate or severe malnutrition, according to the NCHS reference (weight-for-height<80% of the NCHS median, and/or mid-upper arm circumference<110 mm for children taller than 65 cm and/or presence of bipedal edema). Our objective was to identify baseline risk factors for death among children diagnosed with severe malnutrition using the newly introduced WHO growth standards. As the release of WHO growth standards changed the definition of severe malnutrition, which now includes many children formerly identified as moderately malnourished with the NCHS reference, studying this new category of children is crucial. METHODOLOGY: Program monitoring data were collected from the medical records of all children admitted in the program. Data included age, sex, height, weight, MUAC, clinical signs on admission including edema, and type of discharge (recovery, death, and default/loss to follow up). Additional data included results of a malaria rapid diagnostic test due to Plasmodium falciparum (Paracheck) and whether the child was a resident of the region of Maradi or came from bordering Nigeria to seek treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on a subset of 27,687 children meeting the new WHO growth standards criteria for severe malnutrition (weight-for-height<-3 Z score, mid-upper arm circumference<110 mm for children taller than 65 cm or presence of bipedal edema). We explored two different models: one with only basic anthropometric data and a second model that included perfunctory clinical signs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the first model including only weight, height, sex and presence of edema, the risk factors retained were the weight/height(1.84) ratio (OR: 5,774; 95% CI: [2,284; 14,594]) and presence of edema (7.51 [5.12; 11.0]). A second model, taking into account supplementary data from perfunctory clinical examination, identified other risk factors for death: apathy (9.71 [6.92; 13.6]), pallor (2.25 [1.25; 4.05]), anorexia (1.89 [1.35; 2.66]), fever>38.5 degrees C (1.83 [1.25; 2.69]), and age below 1 year (1.42 [1.01; 1.99]). CONCLUSIONS: Although clinicians will continue to perform screening using clinical signs and anthropometry, these risk indicators may provide additional criteria for the assessment of absolute and relative risk of death. Better appraisal of the child's risk of death may help orientate the child towards either hospitalization or ambulatory care. As the transition from the NCHS growth reference to the WHO standards will increase the number of children classified as severely malnourished, further studies should explore means to identify children at highest risk of death within this group using simple and standardized indicators.