Latent class analysis reveals five homogeneous behavioural and developmental profiles in a large Dutch population sample of infants aged 14-15 months.

Precursors of child psychiatric disorders are often present in infancy, but little is known about the prevalence and course of general psychopathology in population-based samples of children 0-3 years. We examined whether homogeneous behavioural and developmental profiles could be identified in children aged 14-15 months (M = 14.84; SD = 2.19), and we explored whether or not these profiles corresponded with existing classifications of DSM-IV-TR, ICD-10, and DC 0-3R. Parents of 6,330 children answered 74 items about externalizing, internalizing, and social-communicative behaviour. Exploratory factor analysis revealed nine factors: deviant communication, negative emotionality, deviant reactive behaviour, deviant play behaviour, demanding behaviour, social anxiety/inhibition, advanced social interaction problems, basic social interaction problems, and sleep problems. Latent class analysis yielded five profiles, of which three were associated with increased behavioural and developmental problems. Some infants (5.7 %) had communication and social interaction problems corresponding to multisystem developmental disorders (DC 0-3R) and suggestive of anxiety, mood, or pervasive developmental disorders (DSM-IV-TR, ICD-10). Other infants (16.4 %) had communication problems, possibly precursors of communication, language, or speech disorders (DSM-IV-TR, ICD-10). Yet other infants (10.8 %) showed negative and demanding behaviour suggestive of regulation disorders (DC 0-3R), attention-deficit and disruptive behaviour disorders (DSM-IV-TR), or hyperkinetic and conduct disorders (ICD-10). Thus, even in infancy certain distinct behavioural and developmental profiles can be recognized. This combined approach will enable follow-up research into the stability of factors, classes, and profiles over time, and will facilitate early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of behavioural and developmental problems.

Psychotic symptoms in narcolepsy: phenomenology and a comparison with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with narcolepsy often experience pervasive hypnagogic hallucinations, sometimes even leading to confusion with schizophrenia. We aimed to provide a detailed qualitative description of hypnagogic hallucinations and other "psychotic" symptoms in patients with narcolepsy and contrast these with schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. We also compared the prevalence of formal psychotic disorders between narcolepsy patients and controls. METHODS: We used SCAN 2.1 interviews to compare psychotic symptoms between 60 patients with narcolepsy, 102 with schizophrenia and 120 matched population controls. In addition, qualitative data was collected to enable a detailed description of hypnagogic hallucinations in narcolepsy. RESULTS: There were clear differences in the pattern of hallucinatory experiences in narcolepsy vs. schizophrenia patients. Narcoleptics reported multisensory "holistic" hallucinations rather than the predominantly verbal-auditory sensory mode of schizophrenia patients. Psychotic symptoms such as delusions were not more frequent in narcolepsy compared to population controls. In addition, the prevalence of formal psychotic disorders was not increased in patients with narcolepsy. Almost half of narcoleptics reported moderate interference with functioning due to hypnagogic hallucinations, mostly due to related anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Hypnagogic hallucinations in narcolepsy can be differentiated on a phenomenological basis from hallucinations in schizophrenia which is useful in differential diagnostic dilemmas.