Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the distribution of effective dose associated with a single low-dose CT chest examination of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. Organ doses were also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three sites nationwide provided volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) data annually for the 97 MDCT scanners used to image 26,724 participants during the trial. The dose data were representative of the imaging protocols used by the sites for average-size participants. Effective doses were estimated first using the product of the dose-length product (CTDI(vol) × 35-cm scan length) and a published conversion factor, "k." The commercial software product CT-Expo was then used to estimate organ doses to males and females from the average CTDI(vol). Applying tissue-weighting factors from both publication 60 and the more recent publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) allowed comparisons of effective doses to males and to females. RESULTS: The product of DLP and the k factor resulted in a mean effective dose of 1.4 mSv (SD = 0.5 mSv) for a low-dose chest examination across all scanners. The CT-Expo results based on ICRP 60 tissue-weighting factors yielded effective doses of 1.6 and 2.1 mSv for males and females, respectively, whereas CT-Expo results based on ICRP 103 tissue-weighting factors resulted in effective doses of 1.6 and 2.4 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acceptable chest CT screening can be accomplished at an overall average effective dose of approximately 2 mSv as compared with an average effective dose of 7 mSv for a typical standard-dose chest CT examination.

Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The National Lung Screening Trial includes 33 participating institutions that performed 75,133 lung cancer screening CT examinations for 26,724 subjects during 2002-2007. For trial quality assurance reasons, CT radiation dose measurement data were collected from all MDCT scanners used in the trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 247 measurements on 96 MDCT scanners were collected using a standard CT dose index (CTDI) measurement protocol. The scan parameters used in the measurements (tube voltage, milliampere-seconds [mAs], and detector-channel configuration) were set according to trial protocol for average size subjects. The normalized weighted CT dose index (CTDI(w)) (computed as CTDI(w)/mAs) obtained from each trial-participating scanner was tabulated. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant difference in normalized CT dose index among CT scanner manufacturers, likely as a result of design differences, such as filtration, bow-tie design, and geometry. Our findings also indicated a statistically significant difference in normalized CT dose index among CT scanner models from the same manufacturer (e.g., GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare, and Philips Healthcare). We also found a statistically significant difference in normalized CT dose index among all models and all manufacturers; furthermore, we found a statistically significant difference in normalized CT dose index among CT scanners from all manufacturers when we compared scanners with four or eight data channels to those with 16, 32, or 64 channels, suggesting that more complex scanners have improved dose efficiency. CONCLUSION: Average normalized CT dose index values varied by a factor of almost two for all scanners from all manufacturers. This study was focused on machine-specific normalized CT dose index; patient dose and image quality were not addressed.