A characterization of cross-border use of health services in a transborder population at the Mexico-Guatemala border, September-November 2021.

BACKGROUND: Cross-border use of health services is an important aspect of life in border regions. Little is known about the cross-border use of health services in neighboring low- and middle-income countries. Understanding use of health services in contexts of high cross-border mobility, such as at the Mexico-Guatemala border, is crucial for national health systems planning. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the cross-border use of health care services by transborder populations at the Mexico-Guatemala border, as well as the sociodemographic and health-related variables associated with use. METHODS: Between September-November 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey using a probability (time-venue) sampling design at the Mexico-Guatemala border. We conducted a descriptive analysis of cross-border use of health services and assessed the association of use with sociodemographic and mobility characteristics by means of logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 6,991 participants were included in this analysis; 82.9% were Guatemalans living in Guatemala, 9.2% were Guatemalans living in Mexico, 7.8% were Mexicans living in Mexico, and 0.16% were Mexicans living in Guatemala. 2.6% of all participants reported having a health problem in the past two weeks, of whom 58.1% received care. Guatemalans living in Guatemala were the only group reporting cross-border use of health services. In multivariate analyses, Guatemalans living in Guatemala working in Mexico (compared to not working in Mexico) (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.02,11.65), and working in agriculture/cattle, industry, or construction while in Mexico (compared to working in other sectors) (OR 26.67; 95% CI 1.97,360.85), were associated with cross-border use. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-border use of health services in this region is related to transborder work (i.e., circumstantial use of cross-border health services). This points to the importance of considering the health needs of migrant workers in Mexican health policies and developing strategies to facilitate and increase their access to health services.

Interventions to Improve the Reproductive Health of Undocumented Female Migrants and Refugees in Protracted Situations: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Limited evidence exists on interventions aimed at enabling reproductive health (RH) services access for undocumented female migrants and refugee women. We aimed to identify intervention characteristics and impacts on RH outcomes among migrants and refugee women in protracted situations. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of RH intervention studies that reported on migrants and refugee women in protracted situations. We applied 2 search strategies across 6 databases to identify peer-reviewed articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Eligible studies were assessed for content and quality. RESULTS: Of the 21,453 screened studies, we included 10 (all observational) for final data extraction. Interventions implemented among migrant and refugee women included financial support (n=2), health service delivery structure strengthening (n=4), and educational interventions (n=4). Financial support intervention studies showed that enabling women to obtain RH services for free or at a low cost promoted utilization (e.g., increased use of contraception). Interventions that established or strengthened health service delivery structures and linkage demonstrated increased prenatal visits, decreased maternal mortality, and facilitated access to safe abortion through referral services or access to medical abortion. Educational interventions indicated positive effects on RH knowledge and the importance of involving peers and meeting the unique needs of a mobile population. All intervention studies emphasized the need to accommodate migrant security concerns and cultural and linguistic needs. CONCLUSION: Interventions in protracted situations reported positive outcomes when they were migrant or refugee-centered and complementary, culturally acceptable, geographically proximate, and cost-sensitive, as well as recognized the concerns around legality and involved opportunities for peer learning. Free or low-cost RH services and greater availability of basic and emergency maternal and neonatal care showed the most promise but required further community outreach, education, and stronger referral mechanisms. We recommend further participatory implementation research linked to policy and programming.

Access to Health Care for Migrants Along the Mexico-United States Border: Applying a Framework to Assess Barriers to Care in Mexico.

Background: Migrants in Mexico are entitled to care at all levels, independently of their migration status. However, previous studies show that access to care is difficult for this population. As the movement of in-transit migrants and asylum seekers has been interrupted at the Mexico-United States border by migration policies such as the "Remain in Mexico" program, and by border closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mexican health system has the challenge of providing them with health care. Levesque et al.'s framework, according to which access occurs at the interface of health system characteristics and potential users' abilities to interact with it, is a useful theoretical tool to analyze the barriers faced by migrants. Objective: The objective of this article is to analyze the barriers to access the public Mexican health system, encountered by migrants in cities in Mexican states at the Mexico-United States border during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Data came from a multiple case study of the response of migrant shelters to health care needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consisted of a non-probability survey of migrants with a recent health need, and interviews with persons working in civil society organizations providing services to migrants, governmental actors involved in the response to migration, and academics with expertise in the subject. We analyzed the quantitative and qualitative results according to Levesque et al.'s framework. Results: 36/189 migrants surveyed had sought health care in a public service. The main limitations to access were in the availability and accommodation dimension (administrative barriers decreasing migrants' ability to reach the system), and the affordability dimension (out-of-pocket costs limiting migrants' ability to pay). Civil society organizations were a major source of social support, helping migrants overcome some of the barriers identified. Conclusions: While Mexico's health regulations are inclusive of migrants, in practice there are major barriers to access public health services, which might inhibit migrants from seeking those services. In order to comply with its commitment to guarantee the right to health of all persons, the Mexican health authorities should address the implementation gap between an inclusive policy, and the barriers to access that still remain.

Migrant shelters' response to COVID-19: Comparative case study in four cities close to the Mexico-United States border.

Introduction: In the context of a health contingency such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, some groups may remain invisible, so that their health needs go unnoticed. These groups include migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees (MAR). In Mexico there is a network of migrant shelters (casas del migrante-CM) that provide humanitarian assistance, including access to heath care. Given the major role of the CM in caring for migrants, it was important to identify the main elements of their internal capacities, and of the external resources in the cities in which they are located, that contributed to their role in protecting MRA`s health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: we use a comparative case study approach to understand, explain, and compare how internal capacities and external resources available to four CM in the north of Mexico, influenced the development and implementation of COVID-19 related strategies to protect MRA. The project took place during 2021 in Saltillo and Piedras Negras in Coahuila; Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, and in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon. A total of 18 in-depth interviews were performed with key actors from the CM, academia, health care services and international agencies. Results: We found a range from a total closure of one CM, to the continuation of operation of three of them, with differences in the strategies developed to provide services and avoid infections within the facilities. MARs' still face multiple barriers to exercise their right to health, and the response of local governments towards migration and health impacts the response that CM were able to implement. Conclusion: There is a need to strengthening the preparedness and response capacities and coordination mechanisms of local, state and federal authorities to attain their responsibilities in the provision of services directed to MAR, including access to health care.

Increased Rate of Protease Inhibitor-resistance Associated Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Viruses Infecting Mexicans who Had Been Living Abroad.

BACKGROUND: Migrants face multiple barriers to accessing health services and antiretroviral therapy (ART). We tested the hypothesis that HIV-infected ART-experienced Mexicans with a history of residence in the U.S. have a higher rate of viral drug-resistance associated mutations (RAMs) versus those without such a history. METHODS: Viral genotypic resistance tests obtained from 336 HIV-infected Mexican patients throughout the country were analysed for the presence of viral-RAMs and its rate was compared between migrants and non-migrants. Adjustment for potential confounders was done though a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four Mexicans who had lived for at least 3 months in the U.S. were more likely to have three or more protease inhibitor (PI)-major RAMs (aOR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.06-5.76; p < 0.05) than in 252 individuals without this background, independently of the time spent on ART. CONCLUSIONS: A migration background is associated with a higher likelihood of the emergence of HIV variants with decreased susceptibility to several PI.

In-Transit Migrants And Asylum Seekers: Inclusion Gaps In Mexico's COVID-19 Health Policy Response.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, as immigration and asylum processes were delayed or interrupted, migrants and asylum seekers were stranded at Mexico's northern border. In-transit migrants and asylum seekers are an underserved population, and pandemic preparedness has seldom taken their needs into account. In this article we analyze public health policies developed in Mexico in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and describe how these policies have largely overlooked the needs of vulnerable mobile populations. We reviewed eighty publicly available documents issued by federal, state, and municipal authorities in Mexico between January and September 2020. Only seven policy documents explicitly considered in-transit migrants and asylum seekers and their health care needs. In addition, we identified six major gaps in these policies that, if addressed, would promote greater inclusion of persons in mobility in future pandemic response plans, to protect the health of migrant populations.