Peroxynitrite and peroxiredoxin in the pathogenesis of experimental amebic liver abscess.

The molecular mechanisms by which Entamoeba histolytica causes amebic liver abscess (ALA) are still not fully understood. Amebic mechanisms of adherence and cytotoxic activity are pivotal for amebic survival but apparently do not directly cause liver abscess. Abundant evidence indicates that chronic inflammation (resulting from an inadequate immune response) is probably the main cause of ALA. Reports referring to inflammatory mechanisms of liver damage mention a repertoire of toxic molecules by the immune response (especially nitric oxide and reactive oxygen intermediates) and cytotoxic substances released by neutrophils and macrophages after being lysed by amoebas (e.g., defensins, complement, and proteases). Nevertheless, recent evidence downplays these mechanisms in abscess formation and emphasizes the importance of peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)). It seems that the defense mechanism of amoebas against ONOO(-), namely, the amebic thioredoxin system (including peroxiredoxin), is superior to that of mammals. The aim of the present text is to define the importance of ONOO(-) as the main agent of liver abscess formation during amebic invasion, and to explain the superior capacity of amoebas to defend themselves against this toxic agent through the peroxiredoxin and thioredoxin system.

Invasive amebiasis: a microcirculatory disorder?

The two current models of invasive amebiasis both hold that direct contact of toxic molecules and amebas with tissue produces the necrotic areas characteristic of this disorder. Whereas one model characterizes these toxic molecules as amebic products (e.g., lectins, amebapores, cysteine proteinases and other proteolytic enzymes), the other describes them as products of the inflammatory response (e.g., cytokines, nitric oxide, reactive oxygen intermediates and cytotoxic granules). Both these models can account for necrotic areas with many amebas present and with acute inflammation, but not those with few or no amebas present or with scarce inflammation. A new model poses that an inadequate immune response leads to a continuous and prolonged activation of endothelial cells (ECs) by amebas, amebic molecules and cytokines, which triggers the mechanisms leading to necrosis. Other toxic molecules later contribute to EC activation: nitric oxide, reactive oxygen intermediates, the activated complement and proteases. Hyperactivated endothelial cells continuously express adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1 and E-selectin), pro-coagulant molecules (e.g., tissue factor, von Willebrand factor, and the plasminogen activator inhibitor), resulting in ever greater inflammation and thrombosis, which eventually reduces or blocks blood flow in some vessels and starves certain tissue areas of an adequate oxygen and nutrient supply. When necrotic areas first develop, they are surrounded by inflammatory cells due to the acute inflammation at this stage. However, these cells are starved of oxygen and essential nutrients by the same microcirculatory dysfunction. The increasing concentration of nitric oxide during amebiasis eventually has an anti-inflammatory and vasodilating effect, creating a new mechanism for the microcirculatory dysfunction. This local microcirculatory dysfunction can explain necrotic areas in the presence of many, few, or no amebas, with abundant or scarce inflammation.