Exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients With Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Up to 20% of patients develop chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet there is a scarcity of effective interventions for this population. Objective: To evaluate whether neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education were superior to pain neuroscience education alone for patients with chronic pain after TKA. Design, Setting, and Participants: A superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 outpatient clinics at Aalborg University Hospital in Denmark. Participants with moderate-to-severe average daily pain intensity and no signs of prosthesis failure at least 1 year after primary TKA were included. Participant recruitment was initiated on April 12, 2019, and completed on October 31, 2022. The 12-month follow-up was completed on March 21, 2023. Interventions: The study included 24 sessions of supervised neuromuscular exercise (2 sessions per week for 12 weeks) and 2 total sessions of pain neuroscience education (6 weeks between each session) or the same pain neuroscience education sessions alone. The interventions were delivered in groups of 2 to 4 participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months using the mean score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, covering the 4 subscales pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS4; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes). The outcome assessors and statistician were blinded. All randomized participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Among the 69 participants (median age, 67.2 years [IQR, 61.2-71.9 years]; 40 female [58%]) included in the study, 36 were randomly assigned to the neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education group, and 33 to the pain neuroscience education-alone group. The intention-to-treat analysis showed no between-group difference in change from baseline to 12 months for the KOOS4 (7.46 [95% CI, 3.04-11.89] vs 8.65 [95% CI, 4.67-12.63] points; mean difference, -1.33 [95% CI, -7.59 to 4.92]; P = .68). Among the 46 participants who participated in the 12-month assessment in the 2 groups, 16 (34.8%) experienced a clinically important improvement (a difference of ≥10 points on the KOOS4) with no between-group difference. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the results demonstrated that neuromuscular exercises and pain neuroscience education were not superior to pain neuroscience education alone in participants with chronic pain after TKA. Approximately one-third of the participants, regardless of intervention, experienced clinically important improvements. Future studies should investigate which patient characteristics indicate a favorable response to exercises and/or pain neuroscience education. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03886259.

What should a toolkit to aid the delivery of therapeutic exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis look like? Qualitative analysis of an international survey of 318 researchers, clinicians, and consumers by the OARSI Rehabilitation Discussion Group.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify important components of, and practical resources relevant for inclusion in, a toolkit to aid exercise delivery for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: An online international multi-disciplinary survey was conducted across 43 countries (139 clinicians, 44 people with hip/knee osteoarthritis and 135 osteoarthritis researchers). Participants were presented with the seeding statement 'Practical resources to aid the implementation of exercise for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis should…' and asked to provide up to 10 open text responses. Responses underwent refinement and qualitative content analysis to create domains and categories. RESULTS: Refinement of 551 open text responses yielded 72 unique statements relevant for analysis. Statements were organised into nine broad domains, suggesting that resources to aid exercise delivery should: (1) be easily accessible; (2) be of high quality; (3) be developed by, and for, stakeholders; (4) include different ways of delivering information; (5) include different types of resources to support exercise and non-exercise components of self-management; (6) include resources on recommended exercises and how to perform/progress them; (7) include tools to support motivation and track progress; (8) include resources to enable tailoring of the programme to the individual and; (9) facilitate access to professional and peer support. CONCLUSION: Our findings identified important components of, and practical resources to include within, a toolkit to aid delivery of exercise for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis. These findings have implications for exercise providers and lay the foundation for the development of a toolkit to help ensure exercise provision aligns with current international recommendations.

What is known and what is still unknown within chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic evidence and gap map.

ABSTRACT: Evidence and gap maps (EGMs) can be used to identify gaps within specific research areas and help guide future research agendas and directions. Currently, there are no EGMs within the broad domain of chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in adults. The aim of this study was to create a contemporary EGM of interventions and outcomes used for research investigating chronic MSK pain. This EGM was based on systematic reviews of interventions published in scientific journals within the past 20 years. Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were used to retrieve studies for inclusion. The quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-II. Interventions were categorised as either physical, psychological, pharmacological, education/advice, interdisciplinary, or others. Outcomes were categorised using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) recommendations. Of 4299 systematic reviews, 457 were included. Of these, 50% were rated critically low quality, 25% low quality, 10% moderate quality, and 15% rated high quality. Physical interventions (eg, exercise therapy) and education were the most common interventions reported in 80% and 20% of the studies, respectively. Pain (97%) and physical functioning (87%) were the most reported outcomes in the systematic reviews. Few systematic reviews used interdisciplinary interventions (3%) and economic-related outcomes (2%). This contemporary EGM revealed a low proportion of high-quality evidence within chronic MSK pain. This EGM clearly outlines the lack of high-quality research and the need for increased focus on interventions encompassing the entire biopsychosocial perspective.

Participatory research: a Priority Setting Partnership for chronic musculoskeletal pain in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: Patient and stakeholder engagements in research have increasingly gained attention in healthcare and healthcare-related research. A common and rigorous approach to establish research priorities based on input from people and stakeholders is the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA-PSP). The aim of this study was to establish research priorities for chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain by engaging with people living with chronic MSK pain, relatives to people living with chronic MSK pain, healthcare professionals (HCP), and researchers working with chronic MSK pain. METHODS: This JLA-PSP included a nation-wide survey in Denmark, an interim prioritisation, and an online consensus building workshop. The information gained from this was the basis for developing the final list of specific research priorities within chronic MSK pain. RESULTS: In the initial survey, 1010 respondents (91% people living with chronic MSK pain/relatives, 9% HCPs/researchers) submitted 3121 potential questions. These were summarised into 19 main themes and 36 sub-themes. In the interim prioritisation exercise, 51% people living with pain/relatives and 49% HCPs/researchers reduced the list to 33 research questions prior to the final priority setting workshop. 23 participants attended the online workshop (12 people/relatives, 10 HCPs, and 1 researcher) who reached consensus for the most important research priorities after two rounds of discussion of each question. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several specific research questions generated by people living with chronic MSK pain, relatives, HCPs, and researchers. The stakeholders proposed prioritization of the healthcare system's ability to support patients, focus on developing coherent pathways between sectors and education for both patients and HCP. These research questions can form the basis for future studies, funders, and be used to align research with end-users' priorities.

Development of a bedside tool-kit for assessing sensitization in patients with chronic osteoarthritis knee pain or chronic knee pain after total knee replacement.

ABSTRACT: Different pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to the pain development in osteoarthritis (OA). Sensitization mechanisms play an important role in the amplification and chronification of pain and may predict the therapeutic outcome. Stratification of patients according to their pain mechanisms could help to target pain therapy. This study aimed at developing an easy-to-use, bedside tool-kit to assess sensitization in patients with chronic painful knee OA or chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR). In total, 100 patients were examined at the most affected knee and extrasegmentally by the use of 4 standardized quantitative sensory testing parameters reflecting sensitization (mechanical pain threshold, mechanical pain sensitivity, dynamic mechanical allodynia, and pressure pain threshold), a bedside testing battery of equivalent parameters including also temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation, and pain questionnaires. Machine learning techniques were applied to identify an appropriate set of bedside screening tools. Approximately half of the patients showed signs of sensitization (46%). Based on machine learning techniques, a composition of tests consisting of 3 modalities was developed. The most adequate bedside tools to detect sensitization were pressure pain sensitivity (pain intensity at 4 mL pressure using a 10-mL blunted syringe), mechanical pinprick pain sensitivity (pain intensity of a 0.7 mm nylon filament) over the most affected knee, and extrasegmental pressure pain sensitivity (pain threshold). This pilot study presents a first attempt to develop an easy-to-use bedside test to probe sensitization in patients with chronic OA knee pain or chronic pain after TKR. This tool may be used to optimize individualized, mechanism-based pain therapy.

Guidance for Implementing Best Practice Therapeutic Exercise for Patients With Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: What Does the Current Evidence Base Tell Us?

Therapeutic exercise is a recommended first-line treatment for patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA); however, there is little specific advice or practical resources to guide clinicians in its implementation. As the first in a series of projects by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Rehabilitation Discussion Group to address this gap, we aim in this narrative review to synthesize current literature informing the implementation of therapeutic exercise for patients with knee and hip OA, focusing on evidence from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Therapeutic exercise is safe for patients with knee and hip OA. Numerous types of therapeutic exercise (including aerobic, strengthening, neuromuscular, mind-body exercise) may be utilized at varying doses and in different settings to improve pain and function. Benefits from therapeutic exercise appear greater when dosage recommendations from general exercise guidelines for healthy adults are met. However, interim therapeutic exercise goals may also be useful, given that many barriers to achieving these dosages exist among this patient group. Theoretically-informed strategies to improve adherence to therapeutic exercise, such as patient education, goal-setting, monitoring, and feedback, may help maintain participation and optimize clinical benefits over the longer term. Sedentary behavior is also a risk factor for disability and lower quality of life in patients with knee and hip OA, although limited evidence exists regarding how best to reduce this behavior. Current evidence can be used to inform how to implement best practice therapeutic exercise at a sufficient and appropriate dose for patients with knee and hip OA.