Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 83(11): 1283-1288, 2017 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29183532

RESUMO

This study was designed to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Georgia trauma centers with other national trauma centers participating in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP). The use of chemoprophylaxis and characteristics of patients who developed VTE were also examined. We conducted a retrospective observational study of 325,703 trauma admissions to 245 trauma centers from 2013 to 2014. Patient demographics, rate of VTE, as well as the use, type, and timing of chemoprophylaxis were compared between patients admitted to Georgia and non-Georgia trauma centers. The rate of VTE in Georgia trauma centers was 1.9 per cent compared with 2.1 per cent in other national trauma centers. Overall, 49.6 per cent of Georgia patients and 45.5 per cent of patients in other trauma centers had documented chemoprophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin was the most commonly used medication. Most patients who developed VTE did so despite receiving prophylaxis. The rate of VTE despite prophylaxis was 3.2 per cent in Georgia and 3.1 per cent in non-Georgia trauma centers. Mortality associated with VTE was higher in Georgia trauma centers compared with national TQIP benchmarks. The incidence of VTE and use of chemoprophylaxis within Georgia trauma centers were similar to national TQIP data. Interestingly, most patients who developed VTE in both populations received VTE prophylaxis. Further research is needed to develop best-practice guidelines for prevention, early detection, and treatment in high-risk populations.


Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia
2.
Am Surg ; 83(9): 996-1000, 2017 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28958280

RESUMO

This study was conducted to assess whether race and socioeconomic status influence the management method used to treat pediatric perforated appendicitis. Nonelective pediatric admissions with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed using data from the 2001-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association between race, insurance status, median household income, rural/metropolitan location, and the risk adjusted odds of undergoing surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, percutaneous drainage, or neither surgery nor percutaneous drainage. A total of 46,211 admissions of perforated appendicitis were identified. Surgery was performed in 90.5 per cent of them. Black children were less likely to have surgery [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.53] and more likely to be managed nonsurgically with percutaneous drainage (AOR = 1.79). Self-pay patients were less likely to have laparoscopic surgery (AOR = 0.80). Children from rural counties were more likely to undergo surgery than those from larger metropolitan areas (AOR = 1.30). Higher estimated household income did not predict the method of treatment. Although previous studies have attributed racial disparities in outcomes for appendicitis to different rates of perforation and access to care, these findings demonstrate significantly dissimilar management strategies for patients presenting with a similar disease process.


Assuntos
Apendicite/etnologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Etnicidade , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , População Branca , Adolescente , Apendicectomia , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Am J Surg ; 213(4): 673-677, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932087

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes for laparoscopic surgery over open surgery for the treatment of diverticular disease. This study was designed to analyze the relationship between race, socioeconomic status and the use of laparoscopy to address diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 53,054 diverticulitis admissions was performed using data from the 2009-2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The primary outcome was the use of laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine the raw and adjusted odds by race, insurance status, and median household income. RESULTS: Overall, 41.6% of colectomies involved the use of laparoscopy. Black patients were 19% less likely than White patients to undergo laparoscopic surgery. Hispanic patients were no more or less likely to undergo laparoscopic colectomy. Lacking private insurance was a strong predictor of undergoing open surgery. Lower income patients were 33% less likely to receive minimally invasive colectomies. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate disparities in surgical treatment. Further research is warranted to understand and ameliorate treatment differences which can contribute to outcome disparities.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Cobertura do Seguro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , População Branca
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...