Síndrome nefrótico secundario a preeclampsia: presentación, manejo y evolución clínica observados en 5 años de experiencia / Nephrotic syndrome due to preeclampsia: Presentation, management and clinical evolution observed in 5 years experience

Introducción: El síndrome nefrótico (SN) es una entidad rara durante el embarazo. En esta etapa, la preeclampsia (PE) severa es la principal causa. Nuestro objetivo fue describir la presentación clínica, las características analíticas, el manejo médico y la evolución de mujeres con SN por PE. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, realizado entre el 1 de enero de 2017 y el 1 de enero de 2022 (5años). Incluyó mujeres con embarazo ≥20semanas de edad gestacional (EG), internadas por trastorno hipertensivo del embarazo (THE), sin evidencia de daño renal previo a la gestación. Resultados: Entre 652 THE se identificaron 452 PE y 21 SN. La edad materna fue de 25±5,7 años, y la EG al diagnóstico, de 33,1±5,1 semanas. Todas presentaron edema facial y periféricos: 5 derrame pleural, 3 derrame pericárdico y 2 anasarca. La P24 fue de 6,17±2,34g (3,10-10,8), la albúmina sérica de 2,5±0,27g/dl (2,10-2,90) y el colesterol sérico de 281,4±21,7mg/dl (251-316). Hubo 13 que desarrollaron complicaciones maternas: daño renal agudo, edema pulmonar, miocardiopatía dilatada, eclampsia y síndrome HELLP. Todas permanecieron hipertensas en el posparto, requiriendo combinación de dos a tres fármacos antihipertensivos. En el posparto todas recibieron estatinas e inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) para el manejo de la proteinuria; ninguna desarrolló hiperkalemia o elevaciones de creatinina. La estancia hospitalaria fue de 10,4±3,7 días. Todas revirtieron los parámetros proteinúricos de rango nefrótico antes del alta. No se registraron muertes. Conclusión: La presentación incluyó desde edemas periféricos hasta compromiso seroso. La severidad de la proteinuria fue variable. El uso de IECA no precipitó hiperkalemia ni fallo renal. Las complicaciones maternas fueron frecuentes, pero no se observaron óbitos. (AU)

Introduction: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is rare during pregnancy. The main cause is severe pre-eclampsia (PR). Our aim was to describe the clinical presentation, analytical features, medical management, and progress of women with NS due to PE. Materials and methods: A descriptive, retrospective study, conducted from 01/01/2017 to 01/01/2022 (5years). Women with a gestational age (GA) ≥20weeks were included in the study, hospitalised due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), with no evidence of kidney damage prior to gestation. Results: Of the 652 HDP, 452 PE and 21 NS were identified. Maternal age was 25±5.7 years, GA at diagnosis was 33.1±5.1 weeks. All the women had facial and peripheral oedema: 5 pleural effusion, 3 pericardial effusion, and 2 anasarca. Their p24 was 6.17±2.34grams (3.10-10.8), serum albumin 2.5±0.27g/dL (2.10-2.90), and serum cholesterol 281.4±21.7mg/dL (251-316). Thirteen developed maternal complications: acute kidney damage, pulmonary oedema, dilated cardiomyopathy, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome. They all remained hypertensive postpartum, and required a combination of two to three antihypertensive drugs. They all received statins postpartum, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to manage proteinuria. None developed hyperkalaemia or creatinine elevation. Hospital stay was 10.4±3.7days. All nephrotic range proteinuria parameters reversed prior to discharge. No deaths were recorded. Conclusion: Presentation ranged from peripheral oedema to serous involvement. Severity of proteinuria varied. Use of ACE inhibitors did not precipitate hyperkalaemia or kidney failure. Maternal complications were frequent, but no deaths were recorded. (AU)

[Nephrotic syndrome due to preeclampsia: Presentation, management and clinical evolution observed in 5 years experience]. / Síndrome nefrótico secundario a preeclampsia: presentación, manejo y evolución clínica observados en 5 años de experiencia.

INTRODUCTION: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is rare during pregnancy. The main cause is severe pre-eclampsia (PR). Our aim was to describe the clinical presentation, analytical features, medical management, and progress of women with NS due to PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective study, conducted from 01/01/2017 to 01/01/2022 (5years). Women with a gestational age (GA) ≥20weeks were included in the study, hospitalised due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP), with no evidence of kidney damage prior to gestation. RESULTS: Of the 652 HDP, 452 PE and 21 NS were identified. Maternal age was 25±5.7 years, GA at diagnosis was 33.1±5.1 weeks. All the women had facial and peripheral oedema: 5 pleural effusion, 3 pericardial effusion, and 2 anasarca. Their p24 was 6.17±2.34grams (3.10-10.8), serum albumin 2.5±0.27g/dL (2.10-2.90), and serum cholesterol 281.4±21.7mg/dL (251-316). Thirteen developed maternal complications: acute kidney damage, pulmonary oedema, dilated cardiomyopathy, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome. They all remained hypertensive postpartum, and required a combination of two to three antihypertensive drugs. They all received statins postpartum, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to manage proteinuria. None developed hyperkalaemia or creatinine elevation. Hospital stay was 10.4±3.7days. All nephrotic range proteinuria parameters reversed prior to discharge. No deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: Presentation ranged from peripheral oedema to serous involvement. Severity of proteinuria varied. Use of ACE inhibitors did not precipitate hyperkalaemia or kidney failure. Maternal complications were frequent, but no deaths were recorded.

[HELLP Syndrome: clinical-analytical characteristics and evolution observed in two years of experience]. / Síndrome HELLP: características clínicas, analíticas y evolutivas observadas en dos años de experiencia.

INTRODUCTION: HELLP syndrome (H: hemolysis, EL: elevated liver enzymes and LP: low platelets) is a form of severe preeclampsia (PE). The syndrome can be: complete or incomplete (with three analytical criteria, or only one or two); Class i, ii or iii (according platelets < 50,000; 50,000-100,000 or > 100,000/mm3); postpartum or antepartum; with early or late installation (before or after the 34nd week of gestation). We describe and analyze characteristics and evolution observed in hypertensive pregnant patients who developed HELLP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort with observation period of two years. It included pregnant hypertensive women who developed HELLP, during the course of their hospitalization in the maternity hospital of our tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: It included 318 hypertensive pregnant women. We observed 28 HELLP. Maternal age was 25.8 ±7.2 years and gestational age at diagnosis 31 ± 1 week. Hypertension was chronic in 4 and gestational in 24; eight had presented PE in the previous pregnancy. There were 10 complete and 18 incomplete syndromes; according to platelet disease there were 3 Class i, 16 Class ii and 9 Class iii. HELLP was postpartum in 3 and antepartum in 25: 18 early and 7 late. There were 17 patients who required intensive care and 10 developed complications linked to HELLP. No maternal deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: Presentation was variable, exhibiting mostly in gestational hypertension, antepartum and early. Incomplete form and class II thrombocytopenia were more frequent. Maternal complications were frequent but no deaths were observed.

[Utility of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and the polymorphonuclear/ monomorphonuclear ratio, in the prediction of preeclampsia]. / Utilidad del índice neutrófilo/linfocito y del índice polimorfonuclear/monomorfonuclear, en la predicción de preeclampsia.

INTRODUCTION: The appearance of preeclampsia (PE) would comprise the alteration of endothelial function and activation of the inflammatory response, leading to placental hypoperfusion. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the polymorphonuclear/monomorphonuclear ratio (PMR) could measure the underlying inflammatory component and predict the onset of the disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, analytical, case and control study. We retrospectively analysed medical records of pregnant women, hospitalized for hypertension registers. The patients were divided into Group1=with PE development, and Group2=without PE development. RESULTS: 110 patients were included: Group1=58.2% and Group2=41.8%, observing differences between the NLR means (P=.01) and PMR means (P=.02). An NLR ≥4.5 (P=.002; OR=3.9; 95%CI=1.6-9.5) and a PMR ≥3 (P=.004; OR=3.5; 95%CI=1.4-8.4) was related with PE. CONCLUSION: The elevation of NLR and PMR in hypertensive pregnant patients, could be considered indicators for the development of PE.

First-in-man dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of CAP7.1, a novel prodrug of etoposide, in adults with refractory solid tumours.

AIM: An open-label, phase I dose-escalation trial was performed in adult patients with various solid cancers to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and anti-tumour activity of the new prodrug CAP7.1. The prodrug is converted to its active moiety etoposide via carboxylesterases in selective cells leading to a better tolerability and higher efficacy in therapeutic resistance cells and children with refractory neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible adult patients with advanced, refractory, solid malignancies received CAP7.1 as intravenous infusion on 5 consecutive days. Doses were escalated in four cohorts consisting of three to six patients, with a starting dose of 45 mg/m2/day. Treatment cycles were repeated in 21-day intervals in the absence of disease progression and prohibitive toxicity. The safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy were evaluated, and the MTD and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were determined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were assigned to four CAP7.1 dose cohorts (45, 90, 150 and 200 mg/m2/day). CAP7.1 was well tolerated. Haematotoxicity was observed at the two highest dose levels including three DLTs (two febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) only and were reversible with adequate therapy. No organ toxicity was observed. Non-haematological toxicities (mild-moderate) consist mainly of nausea, fatigue, vomiting, pyrexia and alopecia. One partial response and 11 stable diseases were observed as supporting signs of efficacy. CONCLUSION: MTD of CAP7.1 was reached at the dose of 200 mg/m2. A favourable safety profile and initial anti-tumour efficacy of CAP7.1 in therapeutic refractory tumours warrant further evaluation in clinical studies.

Foot Lesions in Farmed Mink (Neovison vison): Pathologic and Epidemiologic Characteristics on 4 Danish Farms.

The aim of this study was to evaluate gross and histologic lesions and epidemiologic factors of foot lesions in farmed mink. The feet of 1159 mink from 4 Danish farms were examined and lesions described. Swabs from the lesions were taken from 27 mink for microbiology, and tissue samples from a representative spectrum of feet with and without lesions (n= 22) were examined histologically. Feet were grouped according to gross inspection: no lesions (55.1%), hair loss (7.1%), hyperkeratosis (35.8%), and crusting (5.3%). Lesions were predominantly located in plantar metatarsal skin (98.1%). Staphylococci were the most prevalent microorganisms cultured from the lesions. There was a significant association between presence of lesions and sex (P< .0001), age (P< .0001), and color type (P= .023). Lesion size was significantly different between hair loss and crusts and between hyperkeratosis and crusts (P< .0001). Histologically, lesions included varying degrees of orthokeratotic to parakeratotic hyperkeratosis and granulomatous to pyogranulomatous dermatitis with trichogranulomas as a dominant feature in all mink. The gross and microscopic lesions were comparable to physically induced changes in other species that develop as a response to repetitive friction or pressure. The condition may have an impact on animal welfare in mink production.

Consensus statement concerning cardiotoxicity occurring during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, with special reference to systemic sclerosis and multiple sclerosis.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now a feasible and effective treatment for selected patients with severe autoimmune diseases. Worldwide, over 650 patients have been transplanted in the context of phase I and II clinical trials. The results are encouraging enough to begin randomised phase III trials. However, as predicted, significant transplant-related morbidity and mortality have been observed. This is primarily due to complications related to either the stage of the disease at transplant or due to infections. The number of deaths related to cardiac toxicity is low. However, caution is required when cyclophosphamide or anthracyclines such as mitoxantrone are used in patients with a possible underlying heart damage, for example, systemic sclerosis patients. In November 2002, a meeting was held in Florence, bringing together a number of experts in various fields, including rheumatology, cardiology, neurology, pharmacology and transplantation medicine. The object of the meeting was to analyse existing data, both published or available, in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation autoimmune disease database, and to propose a safe approach to such patients. A full cardiological assessment before and during the transplant emerged as the major recommendation.

Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: A randomized double-blind multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted to compare the anti-tumor activity of letrozole vs. tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ER and/or PgR positive primary untreated breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty-seven postmenopausal women with ER and/or PgR positive primary untreated breast cancer were randomly assigned once daily treatment with either letrozole 2.5 mg or tamoxifen 20 mg for four months. At baseline none of the patients were considered to be candidates for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 14% of the patients were considered inoperable. The primary endpoint was to compare overall objective response (CR + PR) determined by clinical palpation. Secondary endpoints included overall objective response on ultrasound and mammography and the number of patients who qualified for BCS. RESULTS: Overall objective response rate (clinical palpation) was statistically significantly superior in the letrozole group, 55% compared to tamoxifen, 36% (P < 0.001). Secondary endpoints of ultrasound response, 35% vs. 25% (P = 0.042), mammographic response, 34% vs. 16% (P < 0.001), and BCS, 45% vs. 35% (P = 0.022) between the letrozole and tamoxifen groups, respectively, showed letrozole to be significantly superior. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that letrozole is more effective than tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal patients with ER and/or PgR positive primary untreated breast cancer and is at least as well tolerated.

Prostate-specific antigen: A surrogate endpoint for screening new agents against prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: An endpoint for clinical trials of prostate cancer which simplifies traditional endpoints (response of measurable lesions, progression rates, and death) is urgently needed. This is especially true for hormone-unresponsive disease, for which many new drugs are presently in a development phase. This paper presents a rationale for the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in clinical trials of progressive prostate cancer under endocrine treatment. METHODS: The study is based on 84 patients who progressed after radical prostatectomy or node dissection, of whom 24 showed increasing PSA levels under subsequent endocrine treatment. An average linear relationship between (log-transformed) PSA and time and a subject-specific deviation from this average relationship were assessed. The predictive value of the subject-specific parameters of the linear fit with respect to time to prostate cancer-specific death was determined. The outcomes of the fitting procedure were used to calculate sample sizes for future studies (duration, 6 months) using PSA increase over time in hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer as a marker for treatment efficacy. RESULTS: The average PSA doubling time in this population was 4 months (corresponding time constant = 0.25). The assessed variance of the time constants equalled 0.04; the overall residual variance equalled 0.265. The subject-specific rate of change of the log-transformed PSA value in hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer was a highly significant predictor of prostate cancer-specific death. This suggests the potential usefulness of PSA as an endpoint in trials of hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer. Depending on conditions chosen (e.g, desired power and changes in log PSA slope), 18-70 participants per arm will be necessary in future phase III studies. A suggestion (algorithm) for the use of PSA in drug development is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small PSA-based trials in patients with hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer are possible if a similar patient population is utilized. As long as surrogacy is not established, such studies cannot be considered conclusive with respect to effectiveness of treatment, but are likely to be useful as a screening tool for new drugs. Experimental confirmation in human prostate cancer model systems of synergism between PSA decrease and tumor control by a given test treatment is likely to enhance the level of certainty of PSA-based drug evaluation.

[Letrozole (Femara), a new aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer]. / Letrozol (Femara), novyi ingibitor aromatazy dlia lecheniia bol'nykh rasprostranennym rakom molochnoi zhelezy.

The study compares letrozole (Femara and aminoglutethimide (AG), a standard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens. 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) or aminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178) in an open-label, multicenter trial. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed nine months after enrollment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15 months after the last patients was enrolled. We report the results of these analyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total duration of approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response and clinical benefit. Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of 19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg, 0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable disease was longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg (18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole (33%) than on AG (46%). Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control than aminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens.

Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor: randomised trial comparing 2.5 mg daily, 0.5 mg daily and aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Letrozole International Trial Group (AR/BC3).

BACKGROUND: The study compares letrozole and aminoglutethimide (AG), a standard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with antioestrogens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) or aminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178) in an open-label, multicentre trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed nine months after enrollment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15 months after the last patient was enrolled. We report the results of these analyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total duration of approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of 19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg, 0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable disease was longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg (18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole (33%) than on AG (46%). Transient nausea was the most frequent event with letrozole (7% on 0.5 mg, 10% on 2.5 mg, 10% on AG), rash with AG (11%, 1% on 0.5 mg, 3% on 2.5 mg letrozole). CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control than aminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-oestrogens.

Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer. The Epirubicin High Dose (HEPI 010) Study Group.

PURPOSE: A phase III study was performed in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival of a doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised to receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR). RESULTS: Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objective response (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50) of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC 100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 produced significantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation (50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more than two metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001). Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 months vs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect, with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated with FEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), but the incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patients each). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with 5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events, primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100) experienced congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION: This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100 mg/m2 can be administered for repeated cycles without bone marrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with a significant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/or high-burden disease), but no increased survival.

Phase I study of the novel distamycin derivative tallimustine (FCE 24517).

BACKGROUND: Tallimustine, a benzoyl nitrogen mustard derivative of the antiviral agent distamycin A, is a new alkylating agent which binds to A-T rich regions of DNA in the minor groove producing highly sequence-specific alkylations. Its main preclinical features are a significant antitumor activity in animal models and a lack of cross-resistance in vitro and in vivo with L-PAM. Myelotoxicity was dose-limiting in animals, with a more than 100-fold difference in bone marrow sensitivity between mice and dogs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty adult patients (pts) with solid malignancies were entered in the study. The drug was administered as an IV bolus every 4 weeks. CBC was repeated twice a week and serial assessments of renal function were performed in the week following the first cycle. From the starting dose of 50 micrograms/m2, corresponding to 1/3 of the highest non-toxic dose (HNTD) in dogs, there were increases through 10 dose levels, with reliance only on the features of the myelotoxicity observed. RESULTS: The main toxic effect was neutropenia which was dose-limiting, selective and short-lasting. Only previously-untreated pts received doses of 750 micrograms/m2 or more, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in > or = 75% of the cycles. The maximally tolerable dose (MTD) was defined as 1250 micrograms/m2, with 3 of 3 pts developing febrile neutropenia requiring IV antibiotics. A platelet count of < 100 x 10(3)/microliters was observed in only one pt. Bone marrow aspiration performed in selected pts on days 8 and 15 confirmed a highly selective impairment by tallimustine of the myeloid lineage, with rapid recovery of the proliferative compartment. Pharmacokinetic studies performed at 1000 micrograms/m2 and 1250 micrograms/m2 showed a rapid fall of the plasma levels within the first 2 hours with drug concentrations between 100 ng/ml and 400 ng/ml within the first hour. A partial response of 4 months' duration was reported in one previously-untreated pt with cutaneous recurrences of malignant mesothelioma. CONCLUSIONS: The report of some antitumour efficacy, the high selectivity of neutropenia, the lack of significant non-hematological toxic effects and the occurrence of detectable but still low plasma drug concentrations suggest that further clinical evaluation of higher doses of tallimustine in combination with colony-stimulating factors would be justified.

Phase I and endocrine study of exemestane (FCE 24304), a new aromatase inhibitor, in postmenopausal women.

Aromatase inhibitors are a useful therapeutic option in the management of endocrine-dependent advanced breast cancer. A single-dose administration of exemestane (FCE 24304; 6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione), a new irreversible aromatase inhibitor, was investigated in 29 healthy postmenopausal female volunteers. The compound, given at p.o. doses of 0.5, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, 200, 400, and 800 mg (n = 3-4), was found to be a well tolerated, potent, long-lasting, and specific inhibitor of estrogen biosynthesis. The minimal dose which produced the maximum suppression of plasma estrogens was 25 mg, reducing plasma estrone, estradiol, and estrone sulfate to 35, 28, and 39% of basal values, respectively. This maximum suppression, observed at 3 days, persisted for at least 5 days after administration of a single dose. However, there was no interference on cortisol, aldosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, or dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate plasma levels. Peak plasma exemestane concentrations of 27, 221, 343, and 414 ng/ml were reached within 2 h after administration of 50, 200, 400, and 800 mg, respectively. Plasma concentrations declined rapidly and fell under the detection limit (10 ng/ml) at 4 (50 mg) or 24 h (200 and 400 mg). No clinically significant adverse events which could be attributed to the drug were reported. Apart from transient eosinophilia in 3 patients, all biochemical and hematological laboratory parameters were within 1.25-fold of the normal ranges.

Exemestane (FCE 24304), a new steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

Exemestane (FCE 24304; 6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) is a novel orally active irreversible aromatase inhibitor. Its in vitro and in vivo pharmacological properties have been compared to 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA). In preincubation studies with human placental aromatase, exemestane, like 4-OHA, showed enzyme inactivating properties with a similar affinity (Ki 26 vs 29 nM) and a lower rate of inactivation (t1/2 13.9 vs 2.1 min). Conversely, when tested in pregnant mares' serum gonadotropin-treated rats, exemestane was more potent in reducing microsomal ovarian aromatase activity than 4-OHA, after both subcutaneous (ED50 1.8 vs 3.1 mg/kg) and oral dosing (ED50 3.7 vs greater than 100 mg/kg). No interference of exemestane on desmolase or 5 alpha-reductase activity was found. The compound did not show any relevant binding affinity to steroidal receptors, but slight binding to the androgen receptor (approximately 0.2% of dihydrotestosterone), like 4-OHA. In the first phase I trial, healthy postmenopausal volunteers were given single oral doses of exemestane, ranging from 0.5 to 800 mg, and plasma [estrone (E1), estradiol (E2) and estrone sulphate (E1S)] and urinary estrogens (E1 and E2) were measured up to 5-8 days. The minimal effective dose in decreasing estrogens was 5 mg. At 25 mg the maximal suppression was observed at day 3: plasma estrogens fell to 35 (E1), 39 (E2) and 28% (E1S), and urinary estrogens fell to 20 (E1) and 25% (E2) of basal values, these effects still persisting on day 5. No effects on plasma levels of cortisol, aldosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, DHEAS, LH and FSH, and no significant adverse events were observed up to the highest tested dose of 800 mg exemestane.

Phase I-II study of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase I multicenter trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin, given on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks to previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After appropriate staging and a baseline multiple-gated angiogram (MUGA) scan, at least four patients were entered at each dose level, starting at 35 mg/m2 of epirubicin given intravenously (IV) daily for 3 days (105 mg/m2) and escalating by 5 mg/m2 per injection in each dose level (15 mg/m2 per course). Epirubicin was administered up to a maximum dose of 60 mg/m2/d for 3 days (180 mg/m2). The MTD was determined to be 55 mg/m2/d for 3 days (165 mg/m2) after treating a total of 35 (33 assessable) patients. Nadir granulocyte counts and associated febrile episodes comprised the dose-limiting toxicity, but there were no treatment-related deaths. A phase II trial was performed using a dose of 50 mg/m2/d for 3 days (150 mg/m2) every 3 weeks with no dose escalation, but with dose reduction for toxicity as required. A total of 30 patients were entered onto this phase of the study. RESULTS: The major toxicity, as in the phase I trial, was neutropenia with five febrile episodes, again with no treatment-related deaths. An overall response rate of 12 of 63 (19%) was noted in the combined patient population of the phase I-II trial, with 95% confidence intervals of 10% to 31%. When the response rate was analyzed by histology, only one of 17 (6%) patients with squamous histology, as compared with 11 of 46 (24%) with non-squamous histology, responded, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose epirubicin is tolerable and is an active single agent in NSCLC. It should be combined with relatively nonmyelosuppressive agents such as cisplatin to try to obtain higher response rates and extend the survival in this disease.

Phase 1 study of carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer, intermittent intravenous bolus, and 24-hour infusion.

We undertook a phase 1 study of Carboplatin (CBDCA) on an intermittent single intravenous (IV) bolus (schedule A) and a 24-hour continuous infusion schedule (schedule B). Hydration and forced diuresis were not performed. Patients were not premedicated for anticipated vomiting. Thirty-eight adult patients with solid tumors received a total of 71 courses. In schedule A, doses were escalated from 20 to 600 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. At doses of 270 mg/m2 and higher, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were reproducibly seen. The dose of 600 mg/m2 was the maximally tolerated dose, producing severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts less than 30,000/microL). Other toxicities included a fall in hemoglobin levels and tolerable nausea and vomiting. Schedule B produced comparable hematologic and emetogenic toxicities to those in schedule A. In three patients audiograms became abnormal with high-frequency hearing loss without overt deafness. Two patients developed hypomagnesemia without irreversible renal dysfunction. Patients with poor performance status, preexisting renal dysfunction, a third fluid space, or bone metastases seemed to develop increased hematologic toxicity. The recommended phase 2 dose for good risk patients is 400 mg/m2 IV bolus and for poor risk patients 270 mg/m2 IV bolus. Responses were seen in one patient each with head and neck carcinoma (partial response), small cell lung cancer (minor response), and breast cancer (minor response).

Isolation perfusion for malignant melanoma of the extremity: a review.

The role of perfusion, normothermic and hyperthermic, in the curative treatment of melanoma remains controversial. Survival appears to be somewhat improved over that of surgery alone in all stages, especially with hyperthermic perfusion, but all comparisons have been retrospective and uncontrolled. In addition to the usual problems with historical controls, melanoma presents its own special problems because of its unpredictable natural history in any given individual and the multiplicity of factors known to affect prognosis. It is unfortunate that hundreds of patients have been treated in uncontrolled studies. Randomized trials continue to be necessary to define this role and even then careful attention will have to be paid to the distribution of known prognostic factors in each group to insure a comparable cohort of patients. The response of melanoma to perfusion is clearly significant, however, and the response rate seems to be improved with hyperthermic perfusion. Hyperthermic perfusion appears to be a useful palliative treatment for locally advanced melanoma of the extremity, especially for which the alternative surgical therapy would be amputation.