No Increase in Symptoms Toward the End of the Ocrelizumab Infusion Cycle in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Symptom Burden on Ocrelizumab: A Longitudinal Study (SymBOLS).

Background and Objectives: Some patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab (OCR) report worsening symptoms toward the end of the 6-month infusion cycle ('wearing off'). The objective of our study was to comprehensively assess changes in symptom burden across 2 consecutive OCR infusion cycles. Methods: SYMptom Burden on Ocrelizumab, a Longitudinal Study (SymBOLS; NCT04855617) was an investigator-initiated, 2-center study of patients with MS starting or receiving OCR. Patients' symptoms were assessed with NeuroQoL short forms, SymptoMScreen, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire at the start-cycle, mid-cycle, and end-cycle time points in each of the 2 infusion cycles. Symptom scores at the 3 time points within each cycle were compared with repeated-measures ANOVA or the Friedman rank-sum test for non-normal variables. The proportions of patients with a meaningful symptomatic change from the start to the end of each infusion cycle were calculated, and patients whose symptoms improved, worsened, and stayed the same from the start to the end of the cycle were compared with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: One hundred three patients with MS provided longitudinal data for analyses (mean age [SD]: 46.7 [12.2] years, 68% female, 33% non-White, disease duration: 15.5 [5] years, 41% with the Extended Disability Status Scale score >3). On a group level, NeuroQoL and SymptoMScreen scores mostly remained stable or even improved slightly toward the end of each cycle. On an individual level, symptoms remained unchanged across either cycle for most patients, and meaningful symptom worsening from the start to the end of the cycle was no more common than improvement. Meaningful change in symptoms in both cycles was very rare and generally in the direction of improvement toward the end cycle. Despite the lack of evidence for symptom worsening with a longer time from infusion, 54% of patients endorsed feeling of "wearing off" at least sometimes, most commonly as an increase in fatigue. Discussion: Our prospective study failed to uncover evidence for the worsening of symptoms with a longer time from OCR infusion. These findings cast doubt on the existence of wearing off as a physiologic phenomenon in OCR-treated patients with MS. The perception of wearing off is likely the result of natural fluctuations in MS symptoms and attribution bias.

A New England COVID-19 Registry of Patients With CNS Demyelinating Disease: A Pilot Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection requiring hospitalization in patients with CNS demyelinating diseases such as MS and the factors that increase the risk for severe infection to guide decisions regarding patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A pilot cohort of 91 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection from the Northeastern United States was analyzed to characterize patient risk factors and factors associated with an increased severity of COVID-19 infection. Univariate analysis of variance was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test or analysis of variance for continuous variables and the χ2 or Fisher exact test for nominal variables. Univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression identified clinical characteristics or symptoms associated with hospitalization. RESULTS: Our cohort demonstrated a 27.5% hospitalization rate and a 4.4% case fatality rate. Performance on Timed 25-Foot Walk before COVID-19 infection, age, number of comorbidities, and presenting symptoms of nausea/vomiting and neurologic symptoms (e.g., paresthesia or weakness) were independent risk factors for hospitalization, whereas headache predicted a milder course without hospitalization. An absolute lymphocyte count was lower in hospitalized patients during COVID-19 infection. Use of disease-modifying therapy did not increase the risk of hospitalization but was associated with an increased need for respiratory support. DISCUSSION: The case fatality and hospitalization rates in our cohort were similar to those found in MS and general population COVID-19 cohorts within the region. Hospitalization was associated with increased disability, age, and comorbidities but not disease-modifying therapy use.

Prospective growth and developmental outcomes in infants born to mothers with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The importance of supporting pregnancy-related decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients has increasingly been recognized and hence the need for prospective data on pregnancy and pediatric outcomes in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: To assess prospective growth and developmental outcomes of infants born to mothers with multiple sclerosis (IMS). METHODS: PREG-MS is a prospective multicenter cohort study in New England, United States. We followed 65 women with MS and their infants with up to 12 months consistent pediatric follow-up. Pediatric, neurologic, and demographic information was obtained via structured telephone interviews and validated with medical records. RESULTS: No differences in infant weights and lengths with World Health Organization (WHO) 50th percentile standards were observed (p > 0.05). However, larger head circumference (HC) measurements than WHO standards were reported in cohort infants (p < 0.05). There was no association between HC and markers of maternal MS activity, demographic, or social factors. No irreversible pediatric developmental abnormalities were observed. CONCLUSION: This first prospective study on pediatric anthropometry in IMS suggests a possible increase in HC compared to WHO standards without an increase in irreversible developmental abnormalities. The observations are exploratory and require confirmation with larger prospective studies in diverse groups of MS patients.

Leptomeningeal Enhancement on 3D-FLAIR MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Observations in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Meningeal inflammation is implicated in cortical demyelination and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). Gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced 3-dimensional (3D) FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) in MS. Further characterization is needed to determine if LME is an imaging biomarker for meningeal inflammation. We sought to characterize the natural history of LME in the community setting, including persistence/resolution, effect of disease-modifying therapy, scanner variability, timing of acquisition, and imaging pitfalls that may lead to misinterpretation. METHODS: A total of 341 MRI exams with Gd-enhanced 3D-FLAIR were reviewed in MS and non-MS patients to determine frequency of enhancement by MS subtype and association with therapy. A phantom was used to assess scanner variability. Two MS patients with seven LME were imaged at four postinjection time points to generate time-intensity curves. Imaging pitfalls were compiled. RESULTS: A total of 16.6% (40/241) of MS patients revealed LME compared to 8% (8/100) in non-MS patients (P = .04). There was no association with MS subtype, therapy, or disease activity. Detection using General Electric's version of 3D-FLAIR (29%) was greater than with Siemen's 3D-FLAIR (12%) at 1.5T (Tesla) (P < .001). Lesions were generally stable but resolved in 2 patients following high-dose steroids. LME kinetics were heterogeneous, even within patients, without uniform optimal time for acquisition. Enhancement curves exhibited three different variations, similar to the two-compartment model. Imaging pitfalls included enhancements of uncertain biologic significance, cortical veins and anatomic structures, and imaging artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of LME characteristics, variability with imaging parameters, and imaging pitfalls will facilitate determining the potential role as an imaging biomarker for meningeal inflammation.

Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care.

PURPOSE: To promote understanding of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS), recommend optimal screening, monitoring, and treatment strategies, and address barriers to optimal management. METHODS: The National MS Society ("Society") convened experts in cognitive dysfunction (clinicians, researchers, and lay people with MS) to review the published literature, reach consensus on optimal strategies for screening, monitoring, and treating cognitive changes, and propose strategies to address barriers to optimal care. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on current evidence, the Society makes the following recommendations, endorsed by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and the International Multiple Sclerosis Cognition Society: Increased professional and patient awareness/education about the prevalence, impact, and appropriate management of cognitive symptoms. For adults and children (8+ years of age) with clinical or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of neurologic damage consistent with MS: As a minimum, early baseline screening with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) or similarly validated test, when the patient is clinically stable; Annual re-assessment with the same instrument, or more often as needed to (1) detect acute disease activity; (2) assess for treatment effects (e.g. starting/changing a disease-modifying therapy) or for relapse recovery; (3) evaluate progression of cognitive impairment; and/or (4) screen for new-onset cognitive problems. For adults (18+ years): more comprehensive assessment for anyone who tests positive on initial cognitive screening or demonstrates significant cognitive decline, especially if there are concerns about comorbidities or the individual is applying for disability due to cognitive impairment. For children (<18 years): neuropsychological evaluation for any unexplained change in school functioning (academic or behavioral). Remedial interventions/accommodations for adults and children to improve functioning at home, work, or school.

Effectiveness of alternative dose fingolimod for multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is a daily oral medication used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinicians often adopt less frequent dosing for patients with profound drug-induced lymphopenia or other adverse events. Data on the effectiveness of alternate dose fingolimod are limited. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study at 14 sites and identified 170 patients with MS taking alternate doses of fingolimod for ≥1 month. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were collected and compared during daily and alternate fingolimod dosing. RESULTS: Profound lymphopenia (77%), liver function abnormalities (9%), and infections (7%) were the most common reasons for patients to switch to alternate fingolimod dosing. The median follow-up was 12 months on daily dose and 14 months on alternate dose. Most patients (64%) took fingolimod every other day during alternate dosing. Disease activity was similar on alternate dose compared to daily dose: annualized relapse rate was 0.1 on daily dose vs 0.2 on alternate dose (p = 0.25); proportion of patients with contrast-enhancing MRI lesions was 7.6% on daily vs 9.4% on alternate (p = 0.55); proportion of patients with cumulative MS activity (clinical and radiologic disease) was 13.5% on daily vs 18.2% on alternate (p = 0.337). Patients who developed contrast-enhancing lesions while on daily dose were at higher risk for breakthrough disease while on alternate dose fingolimod (odds ratio 11.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the clinical strategy of alternate dosing of fingolimod in patients with good disease control but profound lymphopenia or other adverse events while on daily dose. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with MS on daily dose fingolimod with adverse events, alternate dose fingolimod is associated with disease activity similar to daily dose fingolimod.

No evidence of disease activity in patients receiving fingolimod at private or academic centers in clinical practice: a retrospective analysis of the multiple sclerosis, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in the USA (MS-MRIUS) study.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) center type on outcomes has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in patients with MS receiving fingolimod over 16 months' follow-up at private or academic centers in the USA. METHODS: Clinical and MRI data collected in clinical practice from patients initiating fingolimod were stratified by center type and retrospectively analyzed. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) was defined as patients with no new/enlarged T2/gadolinium-enhancing lesions, no relapses, and no disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores). RESULTS: Data were collected for 398 patients from 25 private centers and 192 patients from eight academic centers. Patients were older (median age = 43 vs 41 years; p = .0047) and had a numerically shorter median disease duration (7.0 vs 8.5 years; p = .0985) at private vs academic centers. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was higher in patients at private than academic centers in the pre-index (0.40 vs 0.29; p = .0127) and post-index (0.16 vs 0.08; p = .0334) periods. The opposite was true for T2 lesion volume in the pre-index (2.86 vs 5.23 mL; p = .0002) and post-index (2.86 vs 5.11 mL; p = .0016) periods; other MRI outcomes were similar between center types. After initiating fingolimod, ARRs were reduced, disability and most MRI outcomes remained stable, and a similar proportion of patients achieved NEDA-3 at private and academic centers (64.1% vs 56.1%; p = .0659). CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics differ between private and academic centers. Over 55% of patients achieved NEDA-3 during fingolimod treatment at both center types.

Assessing 'No Evidence of Disease Activity' Status in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Fingolimod in Routine Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of the Multiple Sclerosis Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes in the USA (MS-MRIUS) Study.

BACKGROUND: 'No evidence of disease activity' (NEDA), a composite measure of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, provides a comprehensive assessment of disease activity, but is not extensively reported in clinical practice. NEDA-3 is defined as patients with no new/enlarged T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesions, no relapses, and no disability progression (according to Expanded Disability Status Scale scores). NEDA-4 comprises the components of NEDA-3 and a fourth criterion of ≤ 0.4% annualized brain volume loss. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess NEDA status among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving fingolimod in clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging data were retrospectively collected from 590 patients who initiated fingolimod at 33 multiple sclerosis centers in the USA. Patients were required to have a magnetic resonance imaging scan in the 6 months before or 1 month after fingolimod initiation (index period) and in the 9-24 months after fingolimod initiation (post-index period). Magnetic resonance imaging data were systematically quantified at a centralized reading facility. The proportions of patients with NEDA-3 or NEDA-4 status during fingolimod treatment were assessed. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median: 16 months), data to assess NEDA-3 and NEDA-4 were available for 586 and 325 patients, respectively. In the post-index period, 58.7% of patients achieved NEDA-3 status (no relapses, 85.2%; no new/enlarged T2/gadolinium-enhancing lesions, 76.3%; no disability progression, 87.9%) and 37.2% achieved NEDA-4 status (no relapses, 86.5%; no new/enlarged T2/gadolinium-enhancing lesions, 78.8%; no disability progression, 91.1%; brain volume loss ≤ 0.4, 58.2%). CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving fingolimod, over half achieved NEDA-3 status and over one-third achieved NEDA-4 status.

A review of disease-modifying therapies for MS: maximizing adherence and minimizing adverse events.

BACKGROUND: In a chronic disabling disorder such as multiple sclerosis (MS), adherence to treatment is of critical importance in maximizing benefits of therapy over the long term. Adverse events (AEs) are often cited by patients who discontinue therapy. METHODS: Databases including Medline, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched for literature pertaining to adherence and AEs in MS published between January 1970 and August 2008. Clinical studies and case reports of AEs were included, as were papers that outlined factors that influence adherence. An advisory board with extensive experience in managing patients with MS developed guidelines to assist healthcare providers in maximizing adherence to disease-modifying therapy. DISCUSSION: Internally based factors such as self-image, and externally based factors such as AEs, may influence patients' willingness and ability to adhere to therapy. Management of AEs associated with disease-modifying therapies and other therapies is reviewed, including intramuscular and subcutaneous interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, IFNbeta-1b, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, methylprednisolone, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, and intravenous immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: Effective management of MS is an ongoing, dynamic process that can enhance patients' adherence to therapy. Healthcare practitioners may address factors influencing adherence among patients with MS by managing treatment expectations, maintaining good communication with the patient, and managing AEs of treatment. Although the guidelines proposed herein originate from a single advisory board, it seems clear that by addressing patient concerns, healthcare practitioners can work with patients to enhance their ability to continue to adhere to their therapies and thereby gain the benefits of their treatment over the long term.