Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk criteria in patients treated with coronary bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: Insights from the POEM trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated a 1 to 6-month short dual antiplatelet therapy (S-DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with modern drug eluting-stents to reduce bleeding events. OBJECTIVES: To investigate cardiovascular outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria after PCI with the Synergy bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (EES). METHODS: We applied ARC-HBR criteria in the population of the prospective, single-arm, multicenter POEM (Performance of Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Everolimus-Eluting Synergy Stent in Patients at HBR Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Followed by 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) trial. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite or probable stent thrombosis at 12 months. RESULTS: The original POEM cohort included 356 patients (80.4 %) fulfilling ARC-HBR criteria. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage and age ≥75 years were the most frequent major and minor ARC-HBR criteria, respectively. The ARC-HBR group was mainly represented by men (71.1 %), with 74.4 ± 9.3 years and a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors. DAPT was prescribed in 79.3 %, and single antiplatelet (SAPT) with OAC in 18.7 %. 12-month follow-up was completed in 96.2 %. The primary endpoint occurred in 5.2 % (95 % CI 3.29-8.10) of patients, whereas bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3-5 occurred in 2.7 % (95 % CI, 1.39 %-5.05 %). CONCLUSION: Previous results of the POEM trial showed positive outcomes regarding ischemic and bleeding events with an S-DAPT regimen after Synergy EES. These results are also confirmed in sub-group analysis when ARC-HBR criteria are applied.

Desmoplakin cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: two distinct forms of cardiomyopathy?

The confirmation of a hypothesis that desmoplakin-related (DSP) cardiomyopathy could represent a distinct clinical entity from the classical, RV-dominant, form of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), most frequently caused by PKP2 mutations, would without any shadow of doubt signify a turning point in the history of this disease. The concept of gene-specific diseases underneath the umbrella diagnosis of ACM would bring fundamental changes not only in the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach, but also in terms of risk stratification, pushing the scientific community towards a more patient-centered view of the disease, similarly to what has already been done in other inherited arrhythmogenic disease (e.g., long QT syndrome [LQTS]). We provide a state-of-the-art review, starting with a brief historical framework to give the necessary context and better focus the question. Then, we proceed with a novel, genotype-to-phenotype-based comparison of the most important aspects of DSP-related cardiomyopathy with the classical, RV-dominant ACM: this allows us to ascertain not only that the differences between the forms exist, but are also clinically relevant and actionable, leading to the underrecognition of the atypical, DSP-related, LV-dominant forms when applying the current diagnostic criteria. These findings will usher an exciting era, in which the scientific community will try to answer a range of questions, starting from the reasons why different desmosomal mutations cause such different phenotypes.