RESUMO
Introducción y objetivo: el tatuaje endoscópico preoperatorio es un procedimiento eficaz que permite la localización intraoperatoria de neoplasias de pequeño tamaño. Sin embargo, actualmente no existen unos criterios definidos sobre las indicaciones del tatuaje endoscópico de estas neoplasias en el momento del diagnóstico. El objetivo es establecer unos criterios endoscópicos para seleccionar los pacientes que precisarán un tatuaje. Material y métodos: estudio ambispectivo de pacientes intervenidos de neoplasia colorrectal por laparoscopia en los que se realizó tatuaje endoscópico en el periodo (2007- 2013 y 2016-2017). De acuerdo con la descripción endoscópica de las neoplasias se clasificaron en: lesiones polipoideas, neoplasias que ocupan < 50% o ≥ 50% de la luz intestinal y neoplasias estenosantes. Resultados: se realizó tatuaje de la lesión en 120 pacientes y en 114 (95%) se identificó el mismo durante la cirugía. La mayor parte de las neoplasias descritas como polipoideas y neoplasias que ocupaban < 50% de la luz intestinal no se visualizaban en la cirugía y por tanto precisaban el tatuaje (33 de 42 y 18 de 26 respectivamente, p = 0.0001, χ2). En cambio, aquellas lesiones estenosantes o bien neoplasias que ocupaban ≥ 50% de la luz intestinal se identificaban mayoritariamente en la cirugía (15 de 15 y 36 de 37 respectivamente, p = 0.0001, χ2) sin necesidad de tatuaje. En conjunto la identificación de las neoplasias según los criterios establecidos fue del 98%. Conclusiones: estos resultados sugieren que es posible establecer unos criterios endoscópicos que permitan realizar un tatuaje selectivo durante la endoscopia diagnóstica manteniendo el éxito del mismo (AU)
Background and aim: Preoperative endoscopic tattooing is an effective procedure to identify small intraoperative neoplasms. However, there are no defined criteria with regard to the indications for endoscopic tattooing of these lesions at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to establish endoscopic criteria that allow the selection of patients who will need a tattoo during the diagnostic colonoscopy. Methods: An ambispective study of patients undergoing laparoscopy due to a colorectal neoplasia who underwent endoscopic tattooing during the period from 2007-2013 and 2016-2017. According to the endoscopic description of the neoplasms, the classification was polypoid lesions, neoplasms occupying < 50% or ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen and stenosing neoplasias. Results: Tattooing of the lesion was performed in 120 patients and the same lesions were identified during surgery in 114 (95%) cases. Most of the neoplasias described as polypoids and neoplasias that occupied < 50% of the intestinal lumen were not visualized during surgery and therefore required a tattoo (33 of 42 and 18 of 26 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2). On the other hand, stenosing lesions or neoplasias occupying ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen were mostly identified during surgery (15 of 15 and 36 of 37 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2) without the need for a tattoo. Overall, the identification of neoplasms according to established criteria was 98%. Conclusion: These results suggest that it is possible to establish endoscopic criteria that allow a successful selective tattooing during diagnostic endoscopy (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Tatuagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Endoscopia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Preoperative endoscopic tattooing is an effective procedure to identify small intraoperative neoplasms. However, there are no defined criteria with regard to the indications for endoscopic tattooing of these lesions at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to establish endoscopic criteria that allow the selection of patients who will need a tattoo during the diagnostic colonoscopy. METHODS: An ambispective study of patients undergoing laparoscopy due to a colorectal neoplasia who underwent endoscopic tattooing during the period from 2007-2013 and 2016-2017. According to the endoscopic description of the neoplasms, the classification was polypoid lesions, neoplasms occupying < 50% or ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen and stenosing neoplasias. RESULTS: Tattooing of the lesion was performed in 120 patients and the same lesions were identified during surgery in 114 (95%) cases. Most of the neoplasias described as polypoids and neoplasias that occupied < 50% of the intestinal lumen were not visualized during surgery and therefore required a tattoo (33 of 42 and 18 of 26 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2). On the other hand, stenosing lesions or neoplasias occupying ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen were mostly identified during surgery (15 of 15 and 36 of 37 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2) without the need for a tattoo. Overall, the identification of neoplasms according to established criteria was 98%. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that it is possible to establish endoscopic criteria that allow a successful selective tattooing during diagnostic endoscopy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tatuagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The association of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and transanal endoscopic surgery in T2 and superficial T3 rectal cancers presents promising results in selected patients. The main objective is to evaluate the long-term loco-regional and systemic recurrence and, as secondary objectives, to provide results of postoperative morbidity and the correlation between complete clinical and pathological response. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study including a consecutive series of patients with T2-T3 superficial rectal cancer, N0, M0 who refused radical surgery (2008-2016). The treatment consisted of preoperative chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) combined with radiotherapy (50, 4Gy) and transanal endoscopic surgery after 8weeks. Preoperative, surgical, pathological and long-term oncologic results were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in the study. Two of them required rescue radical surgery for unfavorable pathological results. A local recurrence (4.5%) was observed and 2patients presented systemic recurrence (9%), with a median follow-up of 45 months. A complete clinical tumor response was achieved in 12 patients (50%), and complete pathological tumor response in 9 patients (37.5%). Postoperative complications were observed in 5 patients (20.8%), and they were mild except one. There was no postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this stage of rectal cancer, our results seem to support this strategy, mainly when a complete pathological response is achieved. The complete clinical tumor response does not coincide with the pathological tumor response. Randomized prospective studies should be performed to standardize this treatment.
