Faster and lower dose imaging: evaluating adaptive, constant gantry velocity and angular separation in fast low-dose 4D cone beam CT imaging.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT) for image-guided lung cancer radiotherapy is increasing, especially for hypofractionated treatments. However, the drawbacks of 4DCBCT include long scan times (∼240 s), inconsistent image quality, higher imaging dose than necessary, and streaking artifacts. With the emergence of linear accelerators that can acquire 4DCBCT scans in a short period of time (9.2 s) there is a need to examine the impact that these very fast gantry rotations have on 4DCBCT image quality. PURPOSE: This study investigates the impact of gantry velocity and angular separation between x-ray projections on image quality and its implication for fast low-dose 4DCBCT with emerging systems, such as the Varian Halcyon that provide fast gantry rotation and imaging. Large and uneven angular separation between x-ray projections is known to reduce 4DCBCT image quality through increased streaking artifacts. However, it is not known when angular separation starts degrading image quality. The study assesses the impact of constant and adaptive gantry velocity and determines the level when angular gaps impair image quality using state-of-the-art reconstruction methods. METHODS: This study considers fast low-dose 4DCBCT acquisitions (60-80 s, 200-projection scans). To assess the impact of adaptive gantry rotations, the angular position of x-ray projections from adaptive 4DCBCT acquisitions from a 30-patient clinical trial were analyzed (referred to as patient angular gaps). To assess the impact of angular gaps, variable and static angular gaps (20°, 30°, 40°) were introduced into evenly separated 200 projections (ideal angular separation). To simulate fast gantry rotations, which are on emerging linacs, constant gantry velocity acquisitions (9.2 s, 60 s, 120 s, 240 s) were simulated by sampling x-ray projections at constant intervals using the patient breathing traces from the ADAPT clinical trial (ACTRN12618001440213). The 4D Extended Cardiac-Torso (XCAT) digital phantom was used to simulate projections to remove patient-specific image quality variables. Image reconstruction was performed using Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), McKinnon-Bates (MKB), and Motion-Compensated-MKB (MCMKB) algorithms. Image quality was assessed using Structural Similarity-Index-Measure (SSIM), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Tissue-Interface-Width-Diaphragm (TIW-D), and Tissue-Interface-Width-Tumor (TIW-T). RESULTS: Patient angular gaps and variable angular gap reconstructions produced similar results to ideal angular separation reconstructions, while static angular gap reconstructions produced lower image quality metrics. For MCMKB-reconstructions, average patient angular gaps produced SSIM-0.98, CNR-13.6, SNR-34.8, TIW-D-1.5 mm, and TIW-T-2.0 mm, static angular gap 40° produced SSIM-0.92, CNR-6.8, SNR-6.7, TIW-D-5.7 mm, and TIW-T-5.9 mm and ideal produced SSIM-1.00, CNR-13.6, SNR-34.8, TIW-D-1.5 mm, and TIW-T-2.0 mm. All constant gantry velocity reconstructions produced lower image quality metrics than ideal angular separation reconstructions regardless of the acquisition time. Motion compensated reconstruction (MCMKB) produced the highest contrast images with low streaking artifacts. CONCLUSION: Very fast 4DCBCT scans can be acquired provided that the entire scan range is adaptively sampled, and motion-compensated reconstruction is performed. Importantly, the angular separation between x-ray projections within each individual respiratory bin had minimal effect on the image quality of fast low-dose 4DCBCT imaging. The results will assist the development of future 4DCBCT acquisition protocols that can now be achieved in very short time frames with emerging linear accelerators.

Reducing 4DCBCT imaging dose and time: exploring the limits of adaptive acquisition and motion compensated reconstruction.

This study investigates the dose and time limits of adaptive 4DCBCT acquisitions (adaptive-acquisition) compared with current conventional 4DCBCT acquisition (conventional-acquisition). We investigate adaptive-acquisitions as low as 60 projections (∼25 s scan, 6 projections per respiratory phase) in conjunction with emerging image reconstruction methods. 4DCBCT images from 20 patients recruited into the adaptive CT acquisition for personalized thoracic imaging clinical study (NCT04070586) were resampled to simulate faster and lower imaging dose acquisitions. All acquisitions were reconstructed using Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), McKinnon-Bates (MKB), motion compensated FDK (MCFDK), motion compensated MKB (MCMKB) and simultaneous motion estimation and image reconstruction (SMEIR) algorithms. All reconstructions were compared against conventional-acquisition 4DFDK-reconstruction using Structural SIMilarity Index (SSIM), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), tissue interface sharpness diaphragm (TIS-D), tissue interface sharpness tumor (TIS-T) and center of mass trajectory (COMT) for difference in diaphragm and tumor motion. All reconstruction methods using 110-projection adaptive-acquisition (11 projections per respiratory phase) had a SSIM of greater than 0.92 relative to conventional-acquisition 4DFDK-reconstruction. Relative to conventional-acquisition 4DFDK-reconstruction, 110-projection adaptive-acquisition MCFDK-reconstructions images had 60% higher SNR, 10% higher CNR, 30% higher TIS-T and 45% higher TIS-D on average. The 110-projection adaptive-acquisition SMEIR-reconstruction images had 123% higher SNR, 90% higher CNR, 96% higher TIS-T and 60% higher TIS-D on average. The difference in diaphragm and tumor motion compared to conventional-acquisition 4DFDK-reconstruction was within submillimeter accuracy for all acquisition reconstruction methods. Adaptive-acquisitions resulted in faster scans with lower imaging dose and equivalent or improved image quality compared to conventional-acquisition. Adaptive-acquisition with motion compensated-reconstruction enabled scans with as low as 110 projections to deliver acceptable image quality. This translates into 92% lower imaging dose and 80% less scan time than conventional-acquisition.

Reducing 4DCBCT scan time and dose through motion compensated acquisition and reconstruction.

Conventional 4DCBCT captures 1320 projections across 4 min. Adaptive 4DCBCT has been developed to reduce imaging dose and scan time. This study investigated reconstruction algorithms that best complement adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition for reducing imaging dose and scan time whilst maintaining or improving image quality compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition using real patient data from the first 10 adaptive 4DCBCT patients. Adaptive 4DCBCT was implemented in the ADaptive CT Acquisition for Personalized Thoracic imaging clinical trial. Adaptive 4DCBCT modulates gantry rotation speed and kV acquisition rate in response to the patient's real-time respiratory signal, ensuring even angular spacing between projections at each respiratory phase. We examined the first 10 lung cancer radiotherapy patients that received adaptive 4DCBCT. Fast, 200-projection scans over 60-80 s, and slower, 600-projection scans over ∼240 s, were obtained after routine patient treatment and compared against conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Adaptive 4DCBCT acquisitions were reconstructed using Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), McKinnon-Bates (MKB), Motion Compensated FDK (MCFDK) and Motion Compensated MKB (MCMKB) algorithms. Reconstructions were assessed via, Structural SIMilarity (SSIM), Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), Tissue Interface Sharpness of Diaphragm (TIS-D) and Tumor (TIS-T). The 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition corresponded to 85% and 55% reduction in imaging dose, shorter and similar scan times of approximately 90 s and 236 s respectively, compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved more than 0.900 SSIM relative to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition, 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved higher SNR, CNR, TIS-T, TIS-D with motion compensated algorithms, MCFDK (208%, 159%, 174%, 247%) and MCMKB (214%, 173%, 266%, 245%) respectively. The 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT MCFDK- and MCMKB-reconstruction results show image quality improvements are possible even with 85% fewer projections acquired. We established acquisition-reconstruction protocols that provide substantial reductions in imaging time and dose whilst improving image quality.