[RHESOU (Registry in HErault Specialized in Onco-Urology) : the first French Registry specialized in Onco-Urology. One-year experience]. / RHESOU (Registre de l'Hérault spécialisé en onco-urologie) : le premier registre français spécialisé en onco-urologie. Un outil méthodologique de recueil de données en onco-urologie. Bilan de faisabilité sur un an d'expérience.

PURPOSE: In 2016, the Herault tumor registry collected 1961cancers in urology (21.4 % from all Herault cancers this year). RHESOU was created to complete RTH' data with specific parameters in onco-urology. The aim of this study is to describe RHESOU and to give some examples with our first results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In November 2018, RHESOU (Registry HErault Specialised in Onco-Urology) was founded with the same registry recommendations. It collects specific oncologic parameters and also complete RTH's data. For each urological cancer, a specific survey with different choices was performed to collect a maximum of data which could be present in patients' file. These surveys were used for urological cancers cases that live in Herault in 2017. RESULTS: In 2017, we collected 970 prostate cancers, 581 bladder cancers, 212 kidney cancers, 51 upper excretory tract cancers, 28 testicle cancers and 9 penil cancers. Our urological data collection gives many possibilities to create many requests for detailed analysis in urological cancers. In this article, we reported data from kidney, bladder and prostate cancers. CONCLUSIONS: RHESOU is a new tool opened to the different urologic corporations (urologists, pathologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, radiologists) that permits an overview in urological cancers in Herault. Finally, one important aim is that this tool will be adapted when new treatments or new important parameters appear in the years ahead. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Prospective medical analysis of radiation therapist image repositioning during image-guided radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation oncologists are responsible for deciding which day-to-day variations are acceptable or not in the treatment setup. However, properly qualified and trained radiation therapists might be capable to perform image registration. We evaluated in our centre the capability and accuracy of radiation therapists to validate positioning images in a prospective study. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A total of 84 patients treated for prostate, head and neck, lung or breast cancer was prospectively and randomly included from July 2011 to July 2013 in radiotherapy unit of our institution. For each patient, three positioning images were randomly analysed. Two radiation oncologists analysed all positioning images and shifts decided by the radiation therapists in an independent and blinded way. The radiation oncologists had to decide whether to validate or not this shift and give a corresponding additional shift, if any. A theoretical disagreement rate less than 5% between radiation therapists and radiation oncologists was planned. RESULTS: A total of 240 images were analysed (head and neck: 15.0%; prostate: 14.2%; breast: 55.0%; lung: 15.8%). The global disagreement between radiation oncologists and radiation therapists for all the images analysed was 2.5% 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [1.0-5.0], corresponding to six images out of 240. A 100% agreement was reached for prostate and lung images, a 97.2% agreement for head and neck images and a 96.2% agreement for breast images. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation therapist validation for repositioning images seemed accurate for image-guided radiotherapy in our institution. Periodic evaluation and in-house training are warranted when routine delegation of image registration to radiation therapists is considered.

[Radiotherapy of bladder cancer]. / Radiothérapie des cancers de vessie.

Surgery (radical cystectomy) is the standard treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radiochemotherapy has risen as an alternative treatment option to surgery as part as organ-sparing combined modality treatment or for patients unfit for surgery. Radiochemotherapy achieves 5-year bladder intact survival of 40 to 65% and 5-year overall survival of 40 to 50% with excellent quality of life. This article introduces the French recommendations for radiotherapy of bladder cancer: indications, exams, technique, dosimetry, delivery and image guidance.

[Radiosensitivity settings in breast cancer]. / Paramètres de radiosensibilité des cancers du sein.

Breast cancers are highly radiosensitive since the risk of recurrences and of mortality after adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery is decreased by 15.7% and 3.8%, respectively at 10 years. The total dose if irradiation also significantly increases local control: a boost of 16 Gy to the tumour bed after breast-conserving surgery reduces the absolute risk of recurrence by 4% at 10 years. Breast cancers are sensitive to the dose per fraction, as shown by the results from four randomized trials which compared standard irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions) with a hypofractionated scheme: no statistical difference was observed in locoregional recurrence and overall survival at 10 years. The α/ß ratio, which reflects the dose per fraction and is theoretically over 10 Gy for tumour tissues, has been estimated between 2.2 and 4.4 Gy for breast cancers. Molecular abnormalities, such as overexpression of HER1 (especially in triple negative breast cancer) and HER2, induce a higher radioresistance. In vitro studies showed that targeted therapies, which block these receptors, increase breast cancer radiosensitivity. Tumour stem cells have been identified in breast cancers and are characterized by a higher radioresistance. This radioresistance could be related to a better repair of radiation-induced DNA damages and a decrease of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are involved in their occurrence. In the future, a better understanding of genetics tumour abnormalities will allow to identify new radiosensitivity settings in breast cancers.