Use of an On-Site Outpatient Pharmacy for Acquisition of Antiretroviral Medications Compared to Off-Site Pharmacy Options: Impact on Retention in Care and Clinical Outcomes in People Living With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Few published studies have examined the relationship between pharmacy location and retention in care or clinical outcome in people living with HIV (PLWH). OBJECTIVE: The study purpose was to determine whether using an on-site/in-clinic pharmacy to obtain antiretroviral therapy increased retention in care and virologic suppression rates. METHODS: PLWH attending a Ryan White outpatient clinic in an academic center were matched based on age and insurance. Rates of retention in care ( ≥2 medical visits/calendar year) were assessed between patients using a pharmacy on-site in the clinic versus patients use off-site pharmacy options. Virologic suppression [viral load(VL)<200 copies/mL], completing ≥2 VL, and CD4 count were compared between pharmacy types. RESULTS: 137 on-site pharmacy patients and 274 off-site pharmacy patients met inclusion and matching criteria. 91.2% of on-site pharmacy users attended ≥2 clinic visits compared to 83.2% of off-site pharmacy users (P = .0275) and were approximately twice as likely to complete ≥2 clinic visits (odds ratio: 2.032; 1.071-3.857). A similar proportion of the on-site pharmacy group achieved virologic suppression compared to the off-site pharmacy group (92.7% vs 89.1%; P = .239, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: On-site pharmacies may provide an opportunity to positively impact retention in care and clinical outcomes for PLWH.

Protamine sulfate for the reversal of enoxaparin associated hemorrhage beyond 12 h.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend protamine sulfate for reversal of enoxaparin associated bleeds dependent on the time from last administration and dose of enoxaparin. We present a case of a hemodynamically unstable patient with an enoxaparin induced abdominal wall hematoma/hemorrhage and the previous enoxaparin administration 21.5 h prior to presentation with a therapeutic anti-Xa assay (0.8 IU/mL) upon assessment in the emergency department. Along with resuscitative efforts, an interdisciplinary team collaborated to administer protamine sulfate 50 mg intravenous once (0.5 mg per 1 mg of enoxaparin) to reverse the therapeutic anticoagulation. Our case demonstrates the importance of monitoring renal function and the potential for accumulation of enoxaparin in patients with renal dysfunction leading to prolonged therapeutic anti-Xa assays. With the availability of anti-Xa assays, future reversal recommendations of enoxaparin associated bleeds using protamine sulfate should include the initial anti-Xa assay as a guide for the dosing regimen.