[Is there an evidence-based management of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis?]. / Peut-on proposer une prise en charge de la fibrose rétropéritonéale idiopathique validée par les données de la littérature?

BACKGROUND: Nowadays it is quite easy to diagnose idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF), particularly with the help of medical imaging. However there is no guideline about the treatment. PURPOSE: Looking for data about an evidence-based management. METHODS: Screening of the database Medline. Titles and abstracts of articles published between 01/01/1985 and 31/12/2004 have been read to identify clinical trials and series about more than ten patients. RESULTS: No record of any therapeutic trials has been found. Eight series in total, which included 177 patients, were identified. Two of the patients have been treated by an ureteral desobstruction only (endoscopy or nephrostomy), 45 by surgery (ureterolysis), 65 by corticotherapy and 64 both by surgery and steroids. For 38 patients, immunosuppressive drugs were combined with corticotherapy (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide or D-penicillamine). According to the authors, doses and duration of corticotherapy varied. Median follow-up lasted 56 months. The outcome is satisfactory in 73% for surgery alone, 86% for medical treatment alone and 73% for both. The association between steroids therapy and immunosuppressive drugs is efficient in 97% of the cases. No clear data about side effects was mentioned. DISCUSSION: Treatment of the IRF is still empirical, based on surgery and corticotherapy. There is no guideline about the treatment strategy. Although tamoxifen has been proposed, efficacy evidence is lacking. Prospective multicenter studies will help us to progress in the management of the IRF.

[Use of nitrates in hospitalised elderly patients aged 65 and over]. / Utilisation des dérivés nitrés chez les patients âgés de 65 ans et plus hospitalisés en médecine interne.

BACKGROUND: Nitrates are frequently prescribed drugs, although their indications are limited. We studied nitrates' prescription in elderly patients hospitalised in the internal medicine ward of a French teaching hospital. METHODS: Hospitalised patients aged 65 years and more and receiving nitrates in their usual treatment were identified prospectively. A standardised questionnaire was used during a structured medical interview conducted by the same physician for all patients. Informations regarding nitrates' prescription were studied according to the actual recommendations for their use: angina in patients with contraindication to betablockers, acute myocardial infarction and acute pulmonary oedema. RESULTS: Among 256 hospitalised elderly patients, 49 (19% [IC95%: 15-25]) were under nitrates therapy, because of either angina pectoris, heart failure or unknown reason. Cardiologists prescribed nitrates in accordance with guidelines significantly more frequently than non-cardiologists. Transdermal treatment was used in 69% of patients. DISCUSSION: In hospitalised patients aged 65 years and more who are prescribed nitrates in their usual treatment, at least one quarter have no recommended indication for its use. As almost one fifth of patients are receiving nitrates in their usual treatment, the medicoeconomic impact of these useless prescriptions could be significant. Nitrates prescribing can be optimized by following guidelines for their use, and restraining from prescribing the transdermal treatment which is more costly and without evidence-based clinical benefit compared to the oral route.