Multidisciplinary and Coordinated Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Current State of the Art.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) present a significant health concern, affecting a substantial portion of the older adult population worldwide. This narrative review explores the prevalence, diagnostic challenges and management strategies for OVCFs. Despite the increasing incidence and impact on morbidity and mortality, existing clinical guidelines lack consistency and clear diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. The review addresses key questions faced by physicians dealing with older adult patients experiencing acute back pain, offering insights into triage, radiological assessments and classification systems. We propose a comprehensive algorithm for clearing OVCF, considering clinical presentation, radiological findings and morphological aspects. Emphasis is placed on the importance of medically treating osteoporosis alongside OVCF management. The review encompasses relevant literature from 1993 to 2023, provides a detailed discussion on triage issues and incorporates a clinically oriented classification system developed by the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. The Material and Methods section outlines the extensive literature search carried out in PUBMED, encompassing clinical and experimental studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The articles retained focused mainly on answering critical questions regarding radiological assessments, imaging modalities and the presence of a specific classification system for OVCFs. The review emphasises that the evaluation and management of OVCFs necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving spine specialists and bone disease experts. It also addresses the role of conservative versus surgical treatments, with a focus on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. The conclusion summarises the algorithm derived for use in emergency departments and general practice, aiming to streamline OVCF management, reduce unnecessary examinations and ensure optimal patient care. The algorithm recommends primary diagnosis using computed tomography, with magnetic resonance imaging reserved for specific cases. The review advocates a holistic approach, integrating medical and surgical interventions to address the complex challenges posed by OVCFs in ageing populations.

Radiographic signs and hip pain 5 years after THA with a cemented stem predict future revision for aseptic loosening: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the long-term predictive value of radiographic abnormality and/or hip pain assessed 5 years following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the occurrence of revision for aseptic loosening between 5 and 25 years postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included all primary THAs performed between 1996 and 2011 (same uncemented cup, polyethylene-ceramic bearing, 28 mm head, cemented stem) and prospectively enrolled in the institutional registry, for whom baseline and follow-up radiographs were available. At 5 years radiographically we assessed femoral osteolysis and/or stem migration. Pain was evaluated with the Harris Hip pain subscore. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 1,317 primary THAs were included. 25 THAs (2%) were revised for aseptic stem loosening. Any abnormal radiographic sign at 5 years was present in 191 THAs (14%). Occasional hip pain was reported by 20% and slight to severe pain by 12% of patients at 5 years. In patients < 60 years, 10 of the 12 later revised for aseptic stem loosening had abnormal radiographs at 5 years vs. 5 of the 13 later revised in those ≥ 60 years. Hazard ratios (HR) were 34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7-155) in younger vs. 4 (CI 1-11) in the older group. HR for association of hip pain at 5 years with future revision was 3 (CI 1-5). CONCLUSION: The presence of abnormal radiographic signs 5 years after THA was strongly associated with later revision for aseptic stem loosening, especially in patients < 60 years. The association between pain at 5 years and future revision was much weaker.

Clinical outcomes of 3T magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar and sacral foraminal injections.

PURPOSE: This article evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MRI-guided lumbar or sacral nerve root infiltration for chronic back pain. We compared the outcomes of our MRI-guided infiltrations with data from CT-guided infiltrations reported in the literature and explored the potential advantages of MRI guidance. METHOD: Forty-eight MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed using a 3 T MRI machine. The optimal needle path was determined using breathhold T2-weighted sequences, and the needle was advanced under interleaved guidance based on breathhold PD-weighted images. Pain levels were assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) before the procedure and up to 5 months after, during follow-up. Procedure success was evaluated by comparing patients' pain levels before and after the infiltration. RESULTS: The MRI-guided infiltrations yielded pain reduction 1 week after the infiltration in 92% of cases, with an average NRS substantial change of 3.9 points. Pain reduction persisted after 5 months for 51% of procedures. No procedure-related complications occurred. The use of a 22G needle and reconstructed subtraction images from T2 FatSat sequences improved the workflow. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that MRI-guided nerve root infiltration is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for chronic back pain. Precise positioning of the needle tip and accurate distribution of the injected solution contributed to the effectiveness of MRI-guided infiltration, which appeared to be as accurate as CT-guided procedures. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of metal artifact reduction sequences to optimize chronic back pain management.

[Endoscopic lumbar surgery]. / Chirurgie lombaire endoscopique.

Spinal endoscopy is the result of an evolution of techniques and technologies in the service of an ever less invasive surgery. It allows the treatment of a large range of pathologies such as disc herniation or spinal stenosis and this range continues to increase. It has already proven its non-inferiority and cost-effectiveness compared to microsurgery despite a difficult learning curve. It has the potential to replace the microscopic «gold standard¼ as it allows a faster recovery for the patient and a shorter hospital stay.

L'endoscopie spinale est le résultat d'une évolution des techniques et des technologies au service d'une chirurgie toujours moins invasive. Elle permet de traiter un bon nombre de pathologies telles que la hernie discale ou la sténose canalaire et ce nombre continue d'augmenter. Elle a déjà prouvé sa non-infériorité et son rapport coûts-bénéfices avantageux par rapport à la microchirurgie, et ce, bien que sa courbe d'apprentissage ne soit pas toujours aisée. Elle a le potentiel de remplacer le « gold standard ¼ microscopique car elle permet une récupération plus rapide pour le patient et une hospitalisation plus courte.

The SWING test: A more reliable test than passive clinical tests for assessing sagittal plane hip mobility.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of sagittal plane hip mobility is usually performed using the Modified Thomas Test (for extension) and the Straight-Leg-Raise (for flexion) with a goniometer. These tests have limited reliability, however. An active swinging leg movement test (the SWING test), assessed using 3D motion analysis, could provide an alternative to these passive clinical tests. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the SWING test a more reliable alternative to evaluate hip mobility, in comparison to the clinical extension and flexion tests? METHODS: Ten asymptomatic adult participants were evaluated by two investigators over three sessions. Participants performed 10 maximal hip extensions and flexions, with both legs straight and no trunk movement (the SWING test). Hip kinematics was assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. Maximal and minimal hip angles were calculated for each swing and represented maximal hip flexion (SWING flexion) and extension (SWING extension), respectively. The Modified Thomas Test and Straight-Leg-Raise were repeated 3 times for each leg. On the first day, both investigators performed all the tests (SWING + Modified Thomas Test + Straight-Leg-Raise). A week later, a single investigator repeated all the tests. Inter-rater, intra-rater, within-day and between-day reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation. RESULTS: Intra-class correlation coefficients for all the tests were superior to 0.8, except for the Modified Thomas Test's intra-rater, between-day (intra-class correlation 0.673) and the Straight-Leg-Raise's inter-rater, within-day (intra-class correlation 0.294). The SWING test always showed a higher intra-class correlation coefficient than the passive clinical tests. The only significant correlation found was for the Straight-Leg-Raise and SWING flexion (r = 0.48; P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: The SWING test seems to be an alternative to existing passive clinical tests, offering better reliability for assessing sagittal plane hip mobility.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of radicular pain, nerve root infiltrations can be performed under MRI guidance in select, typically younger, patients where repeated CT exams are not desirable due to associated radiation risk, or potential allergic reactions to iodinated contrast medium. METHODS: Fifteen 3 T MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed in 12 patients with a dedicated surface coil combined with the standard spine coil, using a breathhold PD sequence. The needle artifact on the MR images and the distance between the needle tip and the infiltrated nerve root were measured. RESULTS: The distance between the needle tip and the nerve root was 2.1 ± 1.4 mm. The visual artifact width, perpendicular to the needle long axis, was 2.1 ± 0.7 mm. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This technical note describes the optimization of the procedure in a 3 T magnetic field, including reported procedure time and an assessment of targeting precision.

Native septic arthritis is not an immediate surgical emergency.

Acute native joint septic arthritis is generally considered a surgical emergency, requiring drainage within hours, including during night, weekend or holiday shifts. However, there are few data supporting the need for the disruption caused by this degree of urgency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all adult patients seen in our medical center from 1997-2015 with culture-proven septic arthritis and noted the epidemiology of sequelae, and their possible association with a delay in surgical drainage. RESULTS: Of 204 septic arthritis episodes, 46 (23%) involved interdigital hand and foot joints. Large joints involved included the knee (n = 67), shoulder (48), hip (22), ankle (8), acromio-clavicular (5), elbow (4), wrist (3), and sterno-clavicular (1) regions. All patients underwent surgical drainage of the joint and received targeted systemic antibiotic therapy. Sequelae of varying severity occurred in 83 patients (41%): recurrences (n = 15); secondary arthrosis (30); persistent pain (9); Girdlestone procedure (9); arthrodesis (9); amputation (8); stiffness (8); and Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (2). By multivariate Cox regression analysis factors did not predict sequelae included: age; treatment with systemic corticosteroids; pre-existing clinical or radiological arthropathy; total duration of antibiotic therapy; type of joint; and, number of surgical interventions. Similarly, there was no association of sequelae with the number of days of pre-hospitalization joint symptoms (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01) or hours spent in the emergency department (HR 1.0, 0.9-1.2). Notably, patients who had joint lavage within 6 h of presentation had similar functional outcomes as those with lavage done at 6-12 h, 12-24 h, or > 24 h after presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that for native septic arthritis, in the absence of clinical sepsis immediate joint drainage does not appear to reduce the risk of sequelae compared with delayed drainage.

[Surgical management of the spinal metastases]. / Métastases de la colonne vertébrale : indications au traitement chirurgical.

Seventy per cent of patients with cancer have evidence of metastases and spinal involvement may occur in up to 50 %. Pain is the most frequent symptom and it occurs in 90 % of the patients. It exist three different type of spinal pain : inflammatory, radicular and mechanical pain. Pain could be related to a neurological compromise and treatment becomes urgent. Steroids are introduced even if surgery is indicated. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score is a useful tool in order to determine instability in spinal metastases. Early recognition of instability could allow to minimal invasive surgery and even vertebroplasty. Tokuhashi score facilitates patient's selection during the decision-making process to the multidisciplinary team.

Septante pour cents des patients atteints de cancer souffriront de métastases, dont la localisation la plus fréquente sera la colonne vertébrale. Dans 90 % des cas, la douleur sera le symptôme d'appel. Elle pourra être inflammatoire, radiculaire ou mécanique, associée ou non à des troubles neurologiques. Si ces derniers sont présents, une prise en charge urgente est nécessaire. Une chirurgie aura plus de succès si elle est associée à un traitement par stéroïdes. Le Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score permet d'évaluer de manière objective la stabilité d'une lésion et de déterminer quelles sont celles à risque latent de fracture et de compromis neurologique. A un stade précoce, la stabilisation peut être réalisée par technique chirurgicale mini-invasive ou vertébroplastie. Le score de Tokuhashi est une aide précieuse lors du processus décisionnel, même si un travail en équipe multidisciplinaire reste la pierre angulaire de la prise en charge de ces pathologies.

Is there a significant seasonality in the occurrence of osteoarticular infections?

Clinical experience suggests fluctuation in the occurrence of osteoarticular infections. We performed a single-centre study during 2004-2012, dividing each year into the four seasons according to the Gregorian calendar. A total of 455 episodes of osteoarticular infections were retrieved. There were 91 prosthetic joint infections (45 of haematogenous origin) and 159 cases of septic arthritis. The median period between early symptoms and diagnosis of infection was 27 days. The overall number of infections per season, cumulated over the 8-year study period, was 119 in spring, 129 in summer, 95 in fall, and 112 in winter, which did not reflect any significant seasonal fluctuation. None of the different subgroups of infections, namely arthroplasties (p for trend = 0.755), haematogenous arthroplasty infections (p = 0.493), gram-negative episodes or arthritis (p = 0.290), showed any season-related fluctuation. We conclude that osteoarticular infections, including haematogenous prosthetic joint infections, do not show any significant seasonality.

Are there clinical variables determining antibiotic prophylaxis-susceptible versus resistant infection in open fractures?

PURPOSE: In Gustilo grade III open fractures, it remains unknown which demographic or clinical features may be associated with an infection resistant to the administered prophylactic agent, compared to one that is susceptible. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study on patients hospitalized from 2004 to 2009. RESULTS: We identified 310 patients with Gustilo-III open fractures, 36 (12%) of which became infected after a median of ten days. In 26 (72%) of the episodes the pathogen was susceptible to the prophylactic antibiotic agent prescribed upon admission, while in the other ten it was resistant. All antibiotic prophylaxis was intravenous; the median duration of treatment was three days and the median delay between trauma and surgery was one day. In multivariate analysis adjusting for case-mix, only Gustilo-grade-IIIc fractures (vascular lesions) showed tendency to be infected with resistant pathogens (odds ratio 10; 95% confidence interval 1.0-10; p = 0.058). There were no significant differences between cases caused by antibiotic resistant and susceptible pathogen cases in patient's sex, presence of immune suppression, duration and choice of antibiotic prophylaxis, choice of surgical technique or materials, time delay until surgery, use of bone reaming, fracture localization, or presence of compartment syndrome. CONCLUSION: We were unable to identify any specific clinical parameters associated with infection with antibiotic resistant pathogens in Gustilo-grade III open fractures, other than the severity of the fracture itself. More research is needed to identify patients who might benefit from a broader-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis.

[Treatment and outcome of fractures around the knee in the older patients]. / Fractures de la région du genou chez la personne agée: prise en charge et evolution.

From the age of 50 the risk of fracture during the remaining years of life is estimated to be 40% in women and 20% men. The management of a fracture in the elderly is complex for several reasons, including decreased bone strength, a frequent association with previous joint replacement surgery or another orthopaedic implant, a high risk for anesthesia, difficulty in following postoperative recommendations, and an increased postoperative mortality. This article offers a review of fractures around the knee: distal femur, proximal tibia, patella and periprosthetic fractures. The vast majority of these fractures are treated surgically. When surgery is indicated, treatment should be initiated as soon as possible according to the patient's general condition in order to minimize the risk of complications and deconditioning.