Dietary sodium restriction reduces blood pressure in patients with treatment resistant hypertension.

PURPOSE: Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) are at particular risk of cardiovascular disease. Life style modification, including sodium restriction, is an important part of the treatment of these patients. We aimed to analyse if self-performed dietary sodium restriction could be implemented in patients with TRH and to evaluate the effect of this intervention on blood pressure (BP). Moreover, we aimed to examine if mechanisms involving nitric oxide, body water content and BNP, renal function and handling of sodium were involved in the effect on nocturnal and 24-h BP. Also, measurement of erythrocyte sodium sensitivity was included as a possible predictor for the effect of sodium restriction on BP levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TRH patients were included for this interventional four week study: two weeks on usual diet and two weeks on self-performed sodium restricted diet with supplementary handed out sodium-free bread. At the end of each period, 24-h BP and 24-h urine collections (sodium, potassium, ENaC) were performed, blood samples (BNP, NOx, salt blood test) were drawn, and bio impedance measurements were made. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, 11 males, with a mean age of 59 years were included. After sodium restriction, urinary sodium excretion decreased from 186 (70) to 91 [51] mmol/24-h, and all but one reduced sodium excretion. Nocturnal and 24-h systolic BP were significantly reduced (- 8 and - 10 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.05). NOx increased, BNP and extracellular water content decreased, all significantly. Change in NOx correlated to the change in 24-h systolic BP. BP response after sodium restriction was not related to sodium sensitivity examined by salt blood test. CONCLUSION: Self-performed dietary sodium restriction was feasible in a population of patients with TRH, and BP was significantly reduced. Increased NOx synthesis may be involved in the BP lowering effect of sodium restriction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in Clinical trials with ID: NCT06022133.

Does conservative kidney management offer a quantity or quality of life benefit compared to dialysis? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD5) collaborate with their clinicians when choosing their future treatment modality. Most elderly patients with CKD5 may only have two treatment options: dialysis or conservative kidney management (CKM). The objective of this systematic review was to investigate whether CKM offers a quantity or quality of life benefit compared to dialysis for some patients with CKD5. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were systematically searched for studies comparing patients with CKD5 who had chosen or were treated with either CKM or dialysis. The primary outcomes were mortality and quality of life (QoL). Hospitalization, symptom burden, and place of death were secondary outcomes. For studies reporting hazard ratios, pooled values were calculated, and forest plots conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-five primary studies, all observational, were identified. All studies reported an increased mortality in patients treated with CKM (pooled hazard ratio 0.47, 95 % confidence interval 0.34-0.65). For patients aged ≥ 80 years and for elderly individuals with comorbidities, results were ambiguous. In most studies, CKM seemed advantageous for QoL and secondary outcomes. Findings were limited by the heterogeneity of studies and biased outcomes favouring dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In general, patients with CKD5 who have chosen or are on CKM live for a shorter time than patients who have chosen or are on dialysis. In patients aged ≥ 80 years old, and in elderly individuals with comorbidities, the survival benefits of dialysis seem to be lost. Regarding QoL, symptom burden, hospitalization, and place of death, CKM may have advantages. Higher quality studies are needed to guide patients and clinicians in the decision-making process.

Estimation of renal perfusion based on measurement of rubidium-82 clearance by PET/CT scanning in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Changes in renal blood flow (RBF) may play a pathophysiological role in hypertension and kidney disease. However, RBF determination in humans has proven difficult. We aimed to confirm the feasibility of RBF estimation based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and rubidium-82 (82Rb) using the abdominal aorta as input function in a 1-tissue compartment model. METHODS: Eighteen healthy subjects underwent two dynamic 82Rb PET/CT scans in two different fields of view (FOV). FOV-A included the left ventricular blood pool (LVBP), the abdominal aorta (AA) and the majority of the kidneys. FOV-B included AA and the kidneys in their entirety. In FOV-A, an input function was derived from LVBP and from AA, in FOV-B from AA. One-tissue compartmental modelling was performed using tissue time activity curves generated from volumes of interest (VOI) contouring the kidneys, where the renal clearance of 82Rb is represented by the K1 kinetic parameter. Total clearance for both kidneys was calculated by multiplying the K1 values with the volume of VOIs used for analysis. Intra-assay coefficients of variation and inter-observer variation were calculated. RESULTS: For both kidneys, K1 values derived from AA did not differ significantly from values obtained from LVBP, neither were significant differences seen between AA in FOV-A and AA in FOV-B, nor between the right and left kidneys. For both kidneys, the intra-assay coefficients of variation were low (~ 5%) for both input functions. The measured K1 of 2.80 ml/min/cm3 translates to a total clearance for both kidneys of 766 ml/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSION: Measurement of renal perfusion based on PET/CT and 82Rb using AA as input function in a 1-tissue compartment model is feasible in a single FOV. Based on previous studies showing 82Rb to be primarily present in plasma, the measured K1 clearance values are most likely representative of effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) rather than estimated RBF values, but as the accurate calculation of total clearance/flow is very much dependent on the analysed volume, a standardised definition for the employed renal volumes is needed to allow for proper comparison with standard ERPF and RBF reference methods.

Effect of amiloride and spironolactone on renal tubular function, ambulatory blood pressure, and pulse wave velocity in healthy participants in a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

We wanted to test the hypothesis that treatment with amiloride or spironolactone reduced ambulatory (ABP) and central blood pressure (CBP) and that tubular transport via ENaCγ and AQP2 was increased after furosemide treatment. During baseline conditions, there were no differences in ABP, CBP, renal tubular function, or plasma concentrations of vasoactive hormones. After furosemide treatment, an increase in CBP, CH(2)o, FE(Na), FE(K), u-AQP2/min, u-ENaCγ/min, PRC, p-Ang II, and p-Aldo was observed. The increases in water and sodium absorption via AQP2 and ENaC after furosemide treatment most likely are compensatory phenomena to antagonize water and sodium depletion.

Abnormal increase in urinary aquaporin-2 excretion in response to hypertonic saline in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the expression/shuttling of the aquaporin-2 water channel (AQP2) and the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in renal collecting duct principal cells has been found in animal models of hypertension. We tested whether a similar dysregulation exists in essential hypertension. METHODS: We measured urinary excretion of AQP2 and ENaC ß-subunit corrected for creatinine (u-AQP2(CR), u-ENaC(ß-CR)), prostaglandin E2 (u-PGE2) and cyclic AMP (u-cAMP), fractional sodium excretion (FE(Na)), free water clearance (C(H2O)), as well as plasma concentrations of vasopressin (AVP), renin (PRC), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone (Aldo), and atrial and brain natriuretic peptide (ANP, BNP) in 21 patients with essential hypertension and 20 normotensive controls during 24-h urine collection (baseline), and after hypertonic saline infusion on a 4-day high sodium (HS) diet (300 mmol sodium/day) and a 4-day low sodium (LS) diet (30 mmol sodium/day). RESULTS: At baseline, no differences in u-AQP2(CR) or u-ENaC(ß-CR) were measured between patients and controls. U-AQP2(CR) increased significantly more after saline in patients than controls, whereas u-ENaC(ß-CR) increased similarly. The saline caused exaggerated natriuretic increases in patients during HS intake. Neither baseline levels of u-PGE2, u-cAMP, AVP, PRC, Ang II, Aldo, ANP, and BNP nor changes after saline could explain the abnormal u-AQP2(CR) response. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in u-AQP2(CR) and u-ENaC(ß-CR) between patients and controls at baseline. However, in response to saline, u-AQP2(CR) was abnormally increased in patients, whereas the u-ENaC(ß-CR) response was normal. The mechanism behind the abnormal AQP2 regulation is not clarified, but it does not seem to be AVP-dependent. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT00345124.

Urinary excretion of AQP2 and ENaC in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease during basal conditions and after a hypertonic saline infusion.

Renal handling of sodium and water is abnormal in chronic kidney diseases. To study the function and regulation of the aquaporin-2 water channel (AQP2) and the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), we measured urinary excretion of AQP2 (u-AQP2), the ß-subunit of ENaC (u-ENaC(ß)), cAMP (u-cAMP), and prostaglandin E(2) (u-PGE(2)); free water clearance (C(H2O)); fractional sodium excretion (FE(Na)); and plasma vasopressin (p-AVP), renin (p-Renin), angiotensin II (p-ANG II), aldosterone (p-Aldo), and atrial and brain natriuretic peptide (p-ANP, p-BNP) in patients with ADPKD and healthy controls during 24-h urine collection and after hypertonic saline infusion during high sodium intake (HS; 300 mmol sodium/day) and low sodium intake (LS; 30 mmol sodium/day). No difference in u-AQP2, u-ENaC(ß), u-cAMP, u-PGE(2), C(H2O), and vasoactive hormones was found between patients and controls at baseline, but during HS the patients had higher FE(Na). The saline caused higher increases in FE(Na) in patients than controls during LS, but the changes in u-ENaC(ß), p-Aldo, p-ANP, p-BNP, p-Renin, and p-ANG II were similar. Higher increases in u-AQP2 and p-AVP were seen in patients during both diets. In conclusion, u-AQP2 and u-ENaC(ß) were comparable in patients with ADPKD and controls at baseline. In ADPKD, the larger increase in u-AQP2 and p-AVP in response to saline could reflect an abnormal water absorption in the distal nephron. During LS, the larger increase in FE(Na) in response to saline could reflect a defective renal sodium retaining capacity in ADPKD, unrelated to changes in u-ENaC(ß).

Protein-enriched diet increases water absorption via the aquaporin-2 water channels in healthy humans.

BACKGROUND: According to animal experiments, a protein-enriched diet increased renal absorption of sodium and water. We wanted to test the hypothesis that a protein-enriched diet would increase the expression of the aquaporin-2 water channels and the epithelial sodium channels in the distal part of the nephron using biomarkers for the activity of the two channels. METHODS: We performed a randomized, placebo controlled crossover study in 13 healthy humans to examine the effect of a protein-enriched diet on renal handling of water and sodium during baseline condition and during hypertonic saline infusion. We measured the effect of the protein-enriched diet on urinary excretions of aquaporin-2 (u-AQP2), the beta-fraction of the epithelial sodium channels (u-ENaC(beta)), free water clearance (C(H2O)), fractional excretion of sodium and vasoactive hormones. RESULTS: During baseline conditions, u-AQP2 increased, and C(H2O) decreased during the protein-enriched diet, whereas u-ENaC(beta) was unchanged, although the urinary sodium excretion increased. During hypertonic saline infusion, the response in the effect variables did not deviate between protein-enriched and normal diet. Plasma concentrations of angiotensin II and aldosterone increased as well as pulse rate. Vasopressin in plasma was unchanged, and prostaglandin E(2) fell during the protein-enriched diet. CONCLUSIONS: The protein-enriched diet increased water absorption via an increased transport via the aquaporin-2 water channels. The increased u-AQP2 might be due to a reduced prostaglandin level. The increase in renal sodium excretion seems to be mediated in another part of the nephron than the epithelial sodium channels.

Effects of dihydralazine on renal water and aquaporin-2 excretion in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Dihydralazine is a vasodilator that lowers blood pressure, but often also leads to significant water and sodium retention. To characterize the effect of dihydralazine on renal sodium and water handling, we tested the hypothesis that dihydralazine causes water retention parallel with an increase in urinary excretion of aquaporin-2 (u-AQP2) in healthy humans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The effect of intravenous infusion of dihydralazine in three doses (3.125 mg, 6.250 mg and 9.375 mg) on urinary AQP2, water and sodium excretion, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and vasoactive hormones was measured in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 17 healthy subjects. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal tubular function were determined with the continuous infusion clearance technique and vasoactive hormones with radioimmunoassays. RESULTS: Dihydralazine compared to placebo had no impact of u-AQP2 (effect of dihydralazine versus placebo +/-SE) (-0.074+/-0.048 ng/min versus -0.015+/-0.034 ng/min; p = 0.42), despite significant reductions in urine output and free water clearance after 9.375 mg of dihydralazine. Dihydralazine significantly lowered BP and increased HR, plasma levels of angiotensin II and (except after 3.125 mg) atrial natriuretic peptide, while plasma levels of vasopressin, GFR and fractional excretions of sodium and lithium were not significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that dihydralazine increases water re-absorption in the distal tubules, independently of vasopressin and of sodium re-absorption. Furthermore, our study does not support an effect of the sympathetic nervous system, the renin-angiotensin system and the natriuretic peptide system on u-AQP2 regulation.