The persistent median artery and its vascular patterns: A meta-analysis of 10,394 subjects.

The presence of a persistent median artery (PMA) has been implicated in the development of compression neuropathies and surgical complications. Due to the large variability in the prevalence of the PMA and its subtypes in the literature, more awareness of its anatomy is needed. The aim of our meta-analysis was to find the pooled prevalence of the antebrachial and palmar persistent median arteries. An extensive search through the major databases was performed to identify all articles and references matching our inclusion criteria. The extracted data included methods of investigation, prevalence of the PMA, anatomical subtype (antebrachial, palmar), side, sex, laterality, and ethnicity. A total of 64 studies (n = 10,394 hands) were included in this meta-analysis. An antebrachial pattern was revealed to be more prevalent than a palmar pattern (34.0% vs. 8.6%). A palmar PMA was reported in 2.6% of patients undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome when compared to cadaveric studies of adult patients in which the prevalence was 8.6%. Both patterns of PMA are prevalent in a considerable portion of the general population. As the estimated prevalence of the PMA was found to be significantly lower in patients undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome than those reported in cadaveric studies, its etiological contribution to carpal tunnel syndrome is questionable. Surgeons operating on the forearm and carpal tunnel should understand the anatomy and surgical implications of the PMA and its anatomical patterns.

The Accessory Parotid Gland and its Clinical Significance.

PURPOSE: The accessory parotid gland is a collection of salivary tissue separate from the main parotid gland. When present, it may complicate parotidectomies, promote parotitis, and serve as a potential site for benign and malignant lesions to arise. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive and current overview of the anatomy of the accessory parotid gland, as there is a wide discrepancy in the literature regarding its prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a search in PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, SciELO, BIOSIS, Current Content Connect, Korean Journal Database, and Russian Citation Index to identify all studies which reported relevant data on the accessory, with no date or language restrictions applied. Data on prevalence, side of occurrence, and sex dimorphism of the accessory parotid gland were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles (n = 3115 subjects) were included in the study. The results revealed that the overall pooled prevalence of an accessory parotid gland was 32.1% (95% confidence interval: 21.2-44.0). It was more prevalent in cadaveric studies (35.8%) than in computed tomography studies (21.5%), had a higher prevalence in Asia (33.8%) as compared to North America (23.5%), and when present, it was most often found as an unilateral structure (77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: With respect to the findings presented, the accessory parotid gland may be considered an anatomical variation likely to encounter in the population. More anatomical studies on the structure and its prevalence are needed, in all regions of the world, to provide a representative global overview.