Establishing a fingerprinting method for fast catheter identification in HDR brachytherapy in vivo dosimetry.

PURPOSE: To use quantities measurable during in vivo dosimetry to build unique channel identifiers, that enable detection of brachytherapy errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plan of 360 patients with prostate cancer who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (range, 16-25 catheters; mean, 17) were used. A single point virtual dosimeter was placed at multiple positions within the treatment geometry, and the source-dosimeter distance and dwell time were determined for each dwell position in each catheter. These values were compared across all catheters, dwell position by dwell position, simulating a treatment delivery. A catheter was considered uniquely identified if, for a given dwell position, no other catheters had the same measured values. The minimum number of dwell positions needed to identify a specific catheter and the optimal dosimeter location uniquely were determined. The radial (r) and vertical (z) dimensions of the source-dosimeter distance were also examined for their utility in discriminating catheters. RESULTS: Using a virtual dosimeter with no uncertainties, all catheters were identified in 359 of the 360 cases with 9 dwell position measurements. When only the dwell time were measured, all catheters were uniquely identified after 1 dwell position. With a 2-mm spatial accuracy (r,z), all catheters were identified in 94% of the plans. Simultaneous measurement of source-dosimeter distance and dwell time ensured full catheter identification in all plans ranging from 2 to 6 dwell positions. The number of dwell positions needed to uniquely identify all catheters was lower when the distance from the implant center was higher. CONCLUSIONS: The most efficient fingerprinting approach involved combining source-dosimeter distance (i.e., source tracking) and dwell time. The further the dosimeter is placed from the center of the implant the better it can uniquely identify catheters.

Simultaneous catheter and multicriteria optimization for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy with a complex intracavity/interstitial applicator.

BACKGROUND: Complex intracavity and interstitial (IC/IS) applicators, such as the Venezia applicator, can improve the HR-CTV coverage while adequately protecting organs at risk in the treatment of cervical cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Although the Venezia applicator offers more choice for catheter selection, commercially available catheter and dose optimization algorithms are still missing for complex applicators. Moreover, studies on catheter and dose optimization for IC/IS implants in the treatment of cervical cancer are still limited. PURPOSE: This work aims to combine a GPU-based multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm with a sparse catheter (SC) optimization algorithm for the Venezia applicator. METHODS: Fifty-eight cervical cancer patients who received 28 Gy in 4 fx of HDR brachytherapy with the Venezia applicator (combination to external beam radiation therapy) are retrospectively revisited. The modelization of the applicator is done by virtually reconstructing all the IS catheters passing through the ring. Template catheters are reconstructed using an in-house python script. To perform simultaneous MCO and SC optimization (SC+MCO), the objective function includes aggregated dose objectives in a weighted sum and a group sparsity term that individually penalizes the contribution of IS catheters. Plans generated with the SC+MCO algorithm are compared with plans generated with MCO using clinical catheters (CC+MCO) and the clinical plans (CP). The EMBRACE II soft constraints (planning aims) and hard constraints (limits for prescribed dose) are used as plan evaluation criteria. RESULTS: CC+MCO gives the most important gain with an increase up to 20.7% in meeting all EMBRACE II soft constraints compared with CP. The SC+MCO algorithm (adding catheter optimization to MCO) provides a second order increase (up to 12.1% with total acceptance rate of 60.3% or 35/58) in the acceptance rate versus CC+MCO (total increase of 32.8% vs. CP). Acceptance rate in EMBRACE II hard constraints is 98.3% (57/58) for both CC+MCO and SC+MCO versus 91.4% (53/58) for CP. The median SC+MCO optimization time is 11 s to generate a total of 5000 Pareto-optimal plans with different catheter configurations (position and number) for each fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous catheter and MCO optimization is clinically feasible for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy using the Venezia applicator. Clinical catheter configurations could be improved and/or the catheter number could be reduced without decreasing plan quality using SC+MCO compared with the CP.

US-guided EM tracked system for HDR brachytherapy: A first in-men randomized study for whole prostate treatment.

PURPOSE: An electromagnetic tracking device (EMT) has been integrated in an HDR 3D ultrasound guidance system for prostate HDR. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of HDR workflows with and without EM tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 58 patients with a 15 Gy HDR prostate boost were randomized in two arms and two operation room (OR) procedures using: (1) the EMT investigational device, and (2) the Oncentra prostate system (OCP). OR times were compared for both techniques. RESULTS: The overall procedure median time was about 20% shorter for EMT (63 min) compared to OCP (79 min). The US acquisition and contouring was longer for OCP compared to EMT (23 min vs. 16 min). The catheter reconstruction's median times were 23 min and 13 min for OCP and EMT respectively. For the automatic reconstruction with EMT, 62% of cases required no or few manual corrections. Using the EM technology in an OR environment was challenging. In some cases, interferences or the stiffness of the stylet introduced errors in the reconstruction of catheters. The last step was the dosimetry with median times of 11 min (OCP) and 15.5 min (EMT). Finally, it was observed that there was no learning curve associated with the introduction of this new technology. CONCLUSIONS: The EMT device offers an efficient solution for automatic catheter reconstruction for HDR prostate while reducing the possibility of mis-reconstructed catheters caused by issues of visualization in the US images. Because of that, the overall OR times was shorter when using the EMT system.

A Monte Carlo dose recalculation pipeline for durable datasets: an I-125 LDR prostate brachytherapy use case.

Monte Carlo (MC) dose datasets are valuable for large-scale dosimetric studies. This work aims to build and validate a DICOM-compliant automated MC dose recalculation pipeline with an application to the production of I-125 low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy MC datasets. Built as a self-contained application, the recalculation pipeline ingested clinical DICOM-RT studies, reproduced the treatment into the Monte Carlo simulation, and outputted a traceable and durable dose distribution in the DICOM dose format. MC simulations with TG43-equivalent conditions using both TOPAS andegs_brachyMC codes were compared to TG43 calculations to validate the pipeline. The consistency of the pipeline when generating TG186 simulations was measured by comparing simulations made with both MC codes. Finally,egs_brachysimulations were run on a 240-patient cohort to simulate a large-scale application of the pipeline. Compared to line source TG43 calculations, simulations with both MC codes had more than 90% of voxels with a global difference under ±1%. Differences of 2.1% and less were seen in dosimetric indices when comparing TG186 simulations from both MC codes. The large-scale comparison ofegs_brachysimulations with treatment planning system dose calculation seen the same dose overestimation of TG43 calculations showed in previous studies. The MC dose recalculation pipeline built and validated against TG43 calculations in this work efficiently produced durable MC dose datasets. Since the dataset could reproduce previous dosimetric studies within 15 h at a rate of 20 cases per 25 min, the pipeline is a promising tool for future large-scale dosimetric studies.

A scintillation dosimeter with real-time positional tracking information for in vivo dosimetry error detection in HDR brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of an electromagnetic (EM)-tracked scintillation dosimeter in detecting source positional errors of IVD in HDR brachytherapy treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different scintillator dosimeter prototypes were coupled to 5 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) EM sensors read by an Aurora V3 system. The scintillators used were a 0.3 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3 ZnSe:O and a BCF-60 plastic scintillator of 0.5 mm diameter and 2.0 mm in length (Saint-Gobain Crystals). The sensors were placed at the dosimeter's tip at 20.0 mm from the scintillator. The EM sampling rate was 40/s while the scintillator signal was sampled at 100 000/s using two photomultiplier tubes from Hamamatsu (series H10722) connected to a data acquisition board. A high-pass filter and a low-pass filter were used to separate the light signal into two different channels. All measurements were performed with an afterloader unit (Flexitron-Elekta AB, Sweden) in full-scattered (TG43) conditions. EM tracking was further used to provide distance/angle-dependent energy correction for the ZnSe:O inorganic scintillator. For the error detection part, lateral shifts of 0.5 to 3 mm were induced by moving the source away from its planned position. Indexer length (longitudinal) errors between 0.5 to 10 mm were also introduced. The measured dose rate difference was converted to a shift distance, with and without using the positional information from the EM sensor. RESULTS: The inorganic scintillator had both a signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and signal-to-background-ratio (SBR) close to 70 times higher than those of the plastic scintillator. The mean absolute difference from the dose measurement to the dose calculated with TG-43U1 was 1.5% ±0.7%. The mean absolute error for BCF-60 detector was 1.7% ± 1.2 % $\pm 1.2\%$ when compared to TG-43 calculations formalism. With the inorganic scintillator and EM tracking, a maximum area under the curve (AUC) gain of 24.0% was obtained for a 0.5-mm lateral shift when using the EMT data with the ZnSe:O. Lower AUC gains were obtained for a 3-mm lateral shifts with both scintillators. For the plastic scintillator, the highest gain from using EM tracking information occurred for a 0.5-mm lateral shift at 20 mm from the source. The maximal gain (17.4%) for longitudinal errors was found at the smallest shifts (0.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that integrating EM tracking to in vivo scintillation dosimeters enables the detection of smaller shifts, by decreasing the dosimeter positioning uncertainty. It also serves to perform position-dependent energy correction for the inorganic scintillator,providing better SNR and SBR, allowing detection of errors at greater distances from the source.

Commissioning of an intra-operative US guided prostate HDR system integrating an EM tracking technology.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-based planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy is commonly used in the clinic, mainly because it offers fast real-time image-guided capability at a relatively low cost. The main difficulty with US planning is the catheter reconstruction due to artefacts (from multiple catheters) and echogenicity. Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) system offers a fast and accurate solution for automatic reconstruction of catheters using the EMT technology. In this study, the commissioning and performance evaluation of the new real-time prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy investigational system from Philips Disease Management Solutions integrating EMT was performed before its clinical integration. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The Philips' clinical investigational system includes a treatment planning software (TPS) that was commissioned based on AAPM TG53 and TG56 recommendations for the use of TPS in brachytherapy. First, the CIRS - model 045A - QA phantom was used to evaluate the ultrasound (US) image quality and 3D image handling. Distances, volumes, and dimensions of the structures inside the phantom were measured and compared to the actual values. The calibration reproducibility and accuracy of the electromagnetic (EM) sensor used to track the US probe (rotation and translation) were performed using a specifically designed QA tool mounted on the probe and immersed in a salted water tank. This was performed for 3 different B&K 8848 US probes to evaluate the sensitivity of EM calibration to the probe geometric properties (manufacturing process). The new TPS performance was compared to that in OncentraBrachy (OcB) V4.5.5 (Elekta) using 30 clinical cases as part of a retrospective study. Following the system commissioning, clinical workflows were explored; tests were performed with the brachytherapy team on phantoms and finally implemented in the clinic. RESULTS: US image quality evaluation showed a mean difference with actual dimensions (lengths, widths and distances) of 0.4 mm (±0.3 mm) and mean difference in volume sizes of 0.2 cc (±0.2 cc). Then, the calibration of the US-to-EM coordinate system was performed for 3 different probes. For each probe, 3 measurements were acquired for every position of the calibration tool and measurements were repeated 3 times for a total of 27 measurements per probe per plane. The error was slightly higher in transverse mode compared to sagittal mode with mean values of 0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm respectively. 30 clinical cases were used to compare the new TPS performance to OcB (IPSA). Optimized plans obtained with both systems were all clinically acceptable, but the plans from the Philips system have slightly higher V150% values, V200% values and dose to organs at risk. In the case of organs at risk, plans could have been manually modified to reduce the dose. Philips' system had a larger number of active dwell positions and longer treatment times. CONCLUSIONS: The first clinical version of Philips' system was proven to be stable, accurate and precise. The fully integrated EM tracking technology opens the way for automated catheter reconstruction and on-the-fly dynamical replanning.

Performance of an enhanced afterloader with electromagnetic tracking capabilities for channel reconstruction and error detection.

PURPOSE: To assess catheter reconstruction and error detection performance of an afterloader (Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) equipped with electromagnetic (EM) tracking capabilities. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Flexitron research unit used was equipped with a special check cable integrating an EM sensor (NDI Aurora V3) that enables tracking and reconstruction capability. The reconstructions of a 24-cm long catheter were performed using two methods: continuous fixed-speed check cable backward stepping (at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25 and 50 cm/s) and stepping through each dwell position every 1 mm. The ability of the system to differentiate between two closely located (parallel) catheters was investigated by connecting catheters to the afterloader and moving it from its axis with an increment of 1 mm. A robotic arm (Meca500, Mecademic, Montreal) with an accuracy of 0.01 mm was used to move the catheter between each reconstruction. Reconstructions were obtained with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing algorithm. To quantify the reconstruction accuracy, distances between two catheters were computed along the reconstruction track with a 5 mm step. The reconstructions of curve catheter paths were assessed through parallel and perpendicular phantom configuration to the EM field generator. Indexer length and lateral errors were simulated and a ROC analysis was made. RESULTS: Using a 50 cm/s check cable speed does not allow for accurate reconstructions. A slower check cable speed results in better reconstruction performance and smaller standard deviations. At 1 cm/s, a catheter can be shifted laterally down to 1 mm and all paths can be uniquely identified. The optimum operating distance from the field generator (50 to 300 mm) resulted in a lower absolute mean deviation from the expected value (0.2 ± 0.1 mm) versus being positioned on the edge of the electromagnetic sensitive detection volume (0.6 ±0.3 mm). The reconstructions of curved catheters with a check cable speed under 5 cm/s gave a 0.8 mm ±0.3 mm error, or better. All indexer and lateral shifts of 1 mm were detected with a check cable speed of 2.5 cm/s or lower. CONCLUSIONS: The EM-equipped Flexitron afterloader is able to track and reconstruct catheters with high accuracy. A speed under 5 cm/s is recommended for straight and curved catheter reconstructions. It allows catheter identification down to 1 mm inter-catheter distance shift. The check cable can also be used to detect common shift errors.

Dose to the bladder neck is not correlated with urinary toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with HDR brachytherapy boost.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the dose to bladder neck (BN) is a predictor of acute and late urinary toxicity after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) boost for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2014 and 2016, patients with prostate cancer treated at our institution with external beam radiation therapy and 15 Gy single-fraction HDRB boost for intermediate- and high-risk disease according to D'Amico definition were reviewed. Intraoperative CT scan-based inverse planning and ultrasound-based inverse planning were performed in 173 and 136 patients, respectively. The following structures were prospectively contoured: prostate, urethra, rectum, bladder, and the BN defined as 5 mm around the urethra between the catheter balloon and the prostatic urethra. Dose to the BN was reported only, no constraint was applied. Acute and late urinary toxicity were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0. Clinical and dosimetry factors associated with urinary toxicity were analyzed using generalized linear models. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients with median age of 71 years (range 50-89) were included. Median followup was 25 months (range 0-39 months). Using D'Amico definition, 71% of the patients had intermediate-risk disease, whereas 29% had high-risk disease. The mean pretreatment prostate-specific antigen value was 9.65 ng/mL. The mean pretreatment, after 6 weeks and over 6 months IPSSs were 8.34, 12.14, and 10.02, respectively. Urinary obstruction was reported in 14 cases (4.5%). Pretreatment IPSS (p = 0.003) and prostate volume (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with acute and late urinary toxicity. The dose for the most exposed 2 cc (D2cc) of BN was not correlated with acute (p = 0.798) or late urinary toxicity (p = 0.859). BN D2cc was not correlated with urinary obstruction (p = 0.272), but bladder V75 was (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: High pretreatment IPSS, large prostate volume and bladder V75 were the only predictors of acute and late urinary toxicity after HDRB boost in our study. Although BN D2cc was associated with acute and late urinary toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy, no correlation was found after HDRB. A prospective study comparing dose to the BN in HDRB monotherapy would validate the impact of BN dose on acute and late urinary toxicity.

Impact of a dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) boost defined by sextant biopsy in permanent I-125 prostate implants on biochemical disease free survival (bDFS) and toxicity outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare bDFS and toxicity outcomes in a population of intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated using I-125 LDR brachytherapy with or without DIL boost based on multiple core biopsy maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2013, all our intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with LDR I-125 brachytherapy were reviewed. All patients were given 144 Gy to the prostate. A pathologic DIL distribution (defined by sextant biopsy) was contoured prospectively prior to planning, to be covered by the 150% isodose line. Of the 165 patients treated, 55 received a DIL boost. Patients completed prospectively the IPSS questionnaire, a sexual and bowel function questionnaire. Gastro-intestinal toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. A patient was considered to have erectile dysfunction if he was unable to achieve erection to perform intercourse. BDFS was determined according to the Phoenix consensus definitions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 78 months. The estimated 7-year bDFS rate was 96% (95% CI, 74-99%) in the DIL group versus 89% (95% CI, 79-94%) in the control group (p = 0.188). There was no difference between groups in urinary, gastro-intestinal or sexual toxicities up to 5 years of follow-up. There was no difference in urinary obstruction with catheterization between DIL versus control groups (3,6 vs 2,8 %, p = 1.00). Only 1 patient in the DIL group had ≥grade 3 toxicity (TURP) and none in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Boost to DIL defined by sextant biopsy with permanent seed prostate implant shows a trend toward improvement of biochemical control in intermediate risk prostate cancer patient without increasing toxicity.

Does Seed Migration Increase the Risk of Second Malignancies in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Iodine-125 Loose Seeds Brachytherapy?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of second malignancies after migration of seeds (MS) in prostate cancer patients treated with 125I loose seeds brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 2802 prostate cancer patients treated with 125I loose seeds brachytherapy in 3 Canadian centers were reviewed. After seeds implant, all patients underwent postimplant pelvic radiography and computed tomography scan for postimplant dosimetry. These images were used to assess whether seed migration occurred. The incidence of second malignancies was determined through the review of patient charts. The 7- and 10-year cumulative incidences of second malignancies and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with the development of second malignancies. RESULTS: Mean age and median follow-up were 63.5 years and 74 (range, 12-246) months, respectively. Migration of seeds occurred in 263 of 2802 patients (9.4%). Second malignancy occurred in 87 patients (3.1%) for the entire cohort and was not different between patients who experienced MS (9, 3.4%) and those who did not (78, 3.1%) (P = .755). The 7-year cumulative incidence rates of second malignancies were 2.95% (95% CI 1.20%-6.00%) (with MS) versus 2.82% (2.10%-3.70%) (without MS) (P = .756). The corresponding values at 10 years were 6.16% (2.20%-12.3%) versus 4.51% (3.20%-5.50%) (P = .570). Migration of seeds did not seem to be a significant predictive factor for second malignancies development (adjusted hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 0.63-2.55]; P = .510). In both models, only advanced age was significantly associated with second malignancies development. CONCLUSIONS: These results did not show an increased risk of second malignancies associated with MS after 125I loose seeds brachytherapy for prostate cancer patients. Longer follow-up and more events are required to better correlate MS and second malignancies.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer treatment: Different combinations of hypofractionated regimens and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of our high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost experience in localized prostate cancer treated with different combinations of radiation doses and fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2011, 832 patients were treated with different regimens of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR-BT. These regimens were converted into three biologically effective dose (BED) groups. The biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), reported with the phoenix definition and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2ng/ml at 5-year, genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The 5-, 10-year BFFS for the entire cohort were 94.6% and 92.5%, for overall survival (OS) 96.1% and 80.3% and for prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) 99.5% and 97.8%. The percentage of patients with a 5-year PSA level <0.2ng/ml was 68.6%, 78.7% and 86.7% in the BED group of <250, 250-260 and >260Gy (p=0.005) while the 5-year BFFS rates according to phoenix definition were 97.3%, 94.3% and 94.9% for BED group <250, 250-260 and >260Gy (p=0.453). On multivariate logistic regression, patients in the BED>260Gy group were significantly more likely to remain free from 5-year PSA values ≥0.2ng/mL compared with those in the BED<250Gy group (OR: 0.350, p=0.011). Grade≥3 acute GU toxicity was reported in 2 patients (4.7%) for BED>260Gy while grade≥3 late GU toxicity was reported in 6 (1.7%) and 9 (4.9%) patients for 250-260Gy and >260Gy BED groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in BED with the hypofractionated regimens correlates with an improvement in biochemical control with of urinary toxicity. This increase in urinary toxicity is small and clinically acceptable.

Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the addition of 3D transabdominal ultrasound (3DTAUS) imaging to computed tomography (CT) can improve treatment planning in 3D adaptive brachytherapy when compared with CT-based planning alone, resulting in treatment plans closer to the ones obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with cervical cancer undergoing brachytherapy underwent three imaging modalities: MRI, CT, and CT-3DTAUS. Volumes were delineated by a radiation oncologist and treatment plans were optimized on each imaging modality. To compare treatment plans, the dwell times optimized on MRI were transferred on CT and CT-3DTAUS images and dose parameters were reported on volumes of the receiving imaging modality. The plans optimized on CT and CT-3DTAUS were also copied and evaluated on MRI images. RESULTS: Treatment plans optimized and evaluated on the same imaging modalities were clinically acceptable but statistically different (p < 0.05) from one another. MR-based plans had the highest target coverage (98%) and CT-based plans the lowest (93%). For all treatment plans evaluated on MRI, the target coverage was equivalent. However, a decrease in target coverage (V100) was observed when MR-based plans were applied on CT-3DTAUS (6%) and CT (13%) with p < 0.05. An increase in the rectum/sigmoid dose (D2cc) was observed with both CT-3DTAUS-based (0.6 Gy) and CT-based planning (1 Gy) when compared with MR-based plans, whereas bladder dose stayed similar. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CT-based planning, the addition of 3DTAUS to CT results in treatment plans closer to MR-based planning. Its use reduces the high-risk clinical target volume overestimation typically observed on CT, improving coverage of the target volume while reducing dose to the organs at risk.

Does prostate volume has an impact on biochemical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR boost?

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) of patients with small and large prostate glands treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and HDR (high dose rate) brachytherapy boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, 548 patients were treated with EBRT followed by HDR boost. The effect of covariates and prostate volume on biochemical failure was analyzed by survival analysis and Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median follow-up and age were not different between the two groups. The mean prostate gland volume at the time of CT planning was 48.1 and 76.0cc in small (<60cc) and large (⩾ 60cc) prostate volume, respectively (p<0.001). When PSA bounces were excluded, there was no significant difference between the two groups with a 5-years BFFS of 95.8% vs 92.3%, p=0.094. There were no significant differences between the two groups for urinary symptoms (IPSS) as well as acute and late GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a HDR brachytherapy boost in large prostate gland cases is feasible at the price of increased PSA bounces. When the benign bounces are excluded, there is no significant difference between the two groups for tumor control and toxicity. Therefore, in our experience, there is no rational precluding the use of HDR boost in patients with a prostate size of 60 cc or more so long as an adequate dosimetry is achievable.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging including spectroscopy: Results of a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including spectroscopy (MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopy [MRS]). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2009 and March 2011, 20 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent multiparametric MRI/MRS protocol before treatment. All patients were treated with an external beam radiotherapy dose of 40 Gy, combined with an HDR brachytherapy boost of 15 Gy. Concurrently, the DIL received a boost of 18 Gy. Missing data during followup were handled with multiple imputations. RESULTS: The median followup was 62 months (range, 23-71 months). Six patients (31%) were classified as favorable intermediate risk and 13 patients (69%) as unfavorable intermediate risk. One patient experienced a prostate-specific antigen biochemical failure, and the 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was of 94.7%. The mean International Prostate Symptom Score rose from 7, with respect to baseline, to 10.42 1 month after treatment, and rapidly decreased to 6.97 after 3 months. Grade 1, 2, and 3 acute genitourinary toxicities were reported in 13 (68%), 3 (16%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 late genitourinary toxicities were reported in 9 (53%) and 3 (18%) patients, respectively. Only grade 1 acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities were reported in 4 (21%) and 3 (18%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering an HDR brachytherapy boost to the DIL using image-guided multiparametric MRI/MRS is feasible with good outcomes for biochemical control, acute and late toxicities, and dosimetric constraints for critical organs.

Validation of the Oncentra Brachy Advanced Collapsed cone Engine for a commercial (192)Ir source using heterogeneous geometries.

PURPOSE: To validate the Advanced Collapsed cone Engine (ACE) dose calculation engine of Oncentra Brachy (OcB) treatment planning system using an (192)Ir source. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two levels of validation were performed, conformant to the model-based dose calculation algorithm commissioning guidelines of American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-186 report. Level 1 uses all-water phantoms, and the validation is against TG-43 methodology. Level 2 uses real-patient cases, and the validation is against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. For each case, the ACE and TG-43 calculations were performed in the OcB treatment planning system. ALGEBRA MC system was used to perform MC simulations. RESULTS: In Level 1, the ray effect depends on both accuracy mode and the number of dwell positions. The volume fraction with dose error ≥2% quickly reduces from 23% (13%) for a single dwell to 3% (2%) for eight dwell positions in the standard (high) accuracy mode. In Level 2, the 10% and higher isodose lines were observed overlapping between ACE (both standard and high-resolution modes) and MC. Major clinical indices (V100, V150, V200, D90, D50, and D2cc) were investigated and validated by MC. For example, among the Level 2 cases, the maximum deviation in V100 of ACE from MC is 2.75% but up to ~10% for TG-43. Similarly, the maximum deviation in D90 is 0.14 Gy between ACE and MC but up to 0.24 Gy for TG-43. CONCLUSION: ACE demonstrated good agreement with MC in most clinically relevant regions in the cases tested. Departure from MC is significant for specific situations but limited to low-dose (<10% isodose) regions.

Monte Carlo dosimetry of high dose rate gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the dosimetric effects of the presence of the applicator, air pockets in clinical target volume (CTV) and OARs along with tissue heterogeneities using the Monte Carlo (MC) method in high dose rate (HDR) gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy with a Syed-Neblett template. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CT based dosimetry has been achieved with the Geant4 MC toolkit version 9.2. DICOM-RT files of 38 patients were imported into our own platform for MC simulations. The dose distributions were then compared to those obtained with a conventional TG-43 calculation. RESULTS: Taking account of heterogeneities has effects of the order of 1% on the HDR gynecological dose distributions. However, the exclusion of air pockets and applicator from the DVH calculation can lower the CTV D90 and V100 by as much as 8.7% and 5.0% in comparison with TG-43. Rectum dosimetric indices can also be lowered by approximately 3% compared with TG-43 for most cases. Differences for urethra and bladder are for most cases below 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusion of non-biological material such as air pockets and applicator volume from the CTV is important for both TG-43 and MC calculations. It could be easily implemented and automated in treatment planning systems without affecting computation times.

Management of Bartholin's gland carcinoma using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost.

PURPOSE: To describe the patterns of use, clinical outcomes, and dose-volume histogram parameters of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in the management of Bartholin's gland cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with Stage II-III Bartholin's gland carcinoma treated with CT-based HDR-ISBT boost were reviewed. Plans were generated using an inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm. Dose-volume histogram parameters were assessed. The total doses of HDR-ISBT and EBRT were converted to total equivalent dose in 2Gy (EQD2). RESULTS: All 5 patients received HDR-ISBT as a boost (median dose, 30Gy) after EBRT (median dose, 45Gy). Three patients received postoperative irradiation for gross residual tumor or positive surgical margins and 2 patients were treated by primary chemoradiotherapy. The median V100, D90, and D100 for the CTV were 98.3%, 89Gy10, and 64Gy10 (EQD2), respectively. A complete response was observed in all patients. No local recurrence occurred. All patients remain alive and free of disease (median followup, 78 months; range, 8-93). Severe vaginal toxicities were observed, including vaginal necrosis that resolved with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-ISBT boost after EBRT offers excellent long-term local control in patients with Bartholin's gland carcinoma. HDR-ISBT should be considered for positive surgical margins or residual tumor after surgery and for locally advanced malignancies treated by primary chemoradiotherapy.

Inverse-planned gynecologic high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: clinical outcomes and dose--volume histogram analysis.

PURPOSE: To present clinical outcomes and dose-volume histogram parameters of three-dimensional image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in patients with primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer unsuitable for intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of 43 women treated between 2001 and 2009 with iridium-192 gynecologic HDR-ISBT boost, using a Syed-Neblett template and inverse planning simulated annealing dose optimization, were reviewed. Median HDR-ISBT dose was 30Gy, delivered in 4-6Gy/fraction. Dose-volume histogram parameters recommended by the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology for image-based ICB were analyzed. Total doses were normalized to 2Gy fractions (biologically equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions). Local control (LC) and survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were defined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. RESULTS: There were 34 primary malignancies (cervix=12, vagina=15, Bartholin's gland=5, and vulva=2) and 9 recurrences. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution for primary cancers was I=2, II=13, III=15, and IV=4. Median followup was 19.3 months (range, 0-92.2). Two-year LC was 87% for primary cancers, and 45% for recurrent cancers, respectively (p=0.0175). Median V(100), D(90), and D(100) for clinical target volume were 97.6%, 90.2, and 68.7Gy(10), respectively. Median bladder and rectal D(2)(cc) were 76.6 and 79.5Gy(3), respectively. Median urethral D(10) was 80.6Gy(3). Twelve patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 late morbidity, but toxicities were transient. Only 2 patients had persistent severe toxicities. A trend toward increased risk for vaginal necrosis was observed with a clinical target volume >84cc. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-ISBT may achieve good LC in gynecologic cancer unsuitable for ICB, especially in primary malignancies with a 2-year LC rate higher than 85%. Delivery of such high doses has potential advantages but may predispose to adverse effects, reversible in most cases.

3D heterogeneous dose distributions for total body irradiation patients.

One major objective of total body irradiation (TBI) treatments is to deliver a uniform dose in the entire body of the patient. Looking at 3D dose distributions for constant speed (CstSpeed) and variable speed (VarSpeed) translating couch TBI treatments, dose uniformity and the effect of body heterogeneities were evaluated. This study was based on retrospective dose calculations of 10 patients treated with a translating couch TBI technique. Dose distributions for CstSpeed and VarSpeed TBI treatments have been computed with Pinnacle3 treatment planning system in homogeneous (Homo) and heterogeneous (Hetero) dose calculation modes. A specific beam model was implemented in Pinnacle3 to allow an accurate dose calculation adapted for TBI special aspects. Better dose coverages were obtained with Homo/VarSpeed treatments compared to Homo/CstSpeed cases including smaller overdosage areas. Large differences between CstSpeed and VarSpeed dose calculations were observed in the brain, spleen, arms, legs, and lateral parts of the abdomen (differences between V100% mean values up to 57.5%). Results also showed that dose distributions for patients treated with CstSpeed TBI greatly depend on the patient morphology, especially for pediatric and overweight cases. Looking at heterogeneous dose calculations, underdosages (2%-5%) were found in high-density regions (e.g., bones), while overdosages (5%-15%) were found in low-density regions (e.g., lungs). Overall, Homo/CstSpeed and Hetero/VarSpeed dose distributions showed more hot spots than Homo/VarSpeed and were greatly dependent on patient anatomy. CstSpeed TBI treatments allow a simple optimization process but lead to less dose uniformity due to the patient anatomy. VarSpeed TBI treatments require more complex dose optimization, but lead to a better dose uniformity independent of the patient morphology. Finally, this study showed that heterogeneities should be considered in dose calculations in order to obtain a better optimization and, therefore, to improve dose uniformity.

Commissioning and evaluation of an extended SSD photon model for PINNACLE3: an application to total body irradiation.

Total body irradiations (TBIs) are unusual radiation therapy techniques used to treat specific hematological diseases. Most TBI techniques use extended source to patient distances [source-to-skin distance (SSD)] to provide lateral or anteroposterior irradiations. Those techniques differ from one institution to the other since they need to be customized to accommodate for local material constraints. However, with those unusual techniques come additional challenges for dose calculation. The purpose of this study was to obtain an accurate (better than 4%) dose calculation model for extended source-to-skin distance (eSSD) treatment techniques, which will be used for TBI planning. The studied dynamic TBI technique has special aspects (eSSD, beam spoiler, large field, and out of field dose contribution) that need to be considered in dose calculation. The first part of this study presents an eSSD beam model commissioning in PINNACLE3 and its validation. The second part looks at the comparison between two dose calculation algorithms, the 3D pencil beam and the superposition-convolution algorithms implemented in THERAPLAN PLUS and PINNACLE3, respectively. A regular linac beam was commissioned in each treatment planning system and an additional dedicated TBI beam model was implemented in PINNACLE3. The comparison results indicate that the quality of the TBI treatment greatly depends on the treatment planning system and its beam commissioning. The superposition-convolution algorithm (PINNACLE3) provides a better dose calculation tool for TBI than the 3D pencil beam algorithm (THERAPLAN PLUS) with a maximum mean error of 2.2% on a dynamic treatment. The TBI specific beam model of PINNACLE3 (ESSP-P3) also improves the dose calculation. The maximum difference between calculations and measurements (depth doses and beam profiles) was 2% except for extreme cases (build-up region and depth of 20 cm) where the error was higher. Output factor determination and the dose contribution outside the primary beam weaknesses were found in PINNACLE3. Methods are proposed to overcome these limitations. With the correction method applied, the TBI specific beam model allows a maximum mean error of -0.68% on a dynamic treatment. Accurate TBI dose computation necessitates a good dose calculation algorithm combined with a realistic beam model. Inappropriate dose calculation could lead to an important over- or underdose estimation. No perfect algorithm and beam model were found, but methods are proposed to overcome some of the limitations. Those methods are simple and can be used for other eSSD treatment types.