Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phys Sportsmed ; : 1-7, 2024 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651524

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the most common online patient questions pertaining to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the quality of the websites providing information. METHODS: Four PCL search queries were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the 'People also ask' tab were expanded in order and 100 results for each query were included (400 total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell's Classification of Questions (Fact, Policy, Value). Websites were categorized by source (Academic, Commercial, Government, Medical Practice, Single Surgeon Personal, Social Media). Website quality was evaluated based on the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria. Pearson's chi-squared was used to assess categorical data. Cohen's kappa was used to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (54.3%). The most common question topics were Diagnosis/Evaluation (18.0%), Indications/Management (15.5%), and Timeline of Recovery (15.3%). The least common question topics were Technical Details of Procedure (1.5%), Cost (0.5%), and Longevity (0.5%). The most common websites were Medical Practice (31.8%) and Commercial (24.3%), while the least common were Government (8.5%) and Social Media (1.5%). The average JAMA score for websites was 1.49 ± 1.36. Government websites had the highest JAMA score (3.00 ± 1.26) and constituted 42.5% of all websites with a score of 4/4. Comparatively, Single Surgeon Personal websites had the lowest JAMA score (0.76 ± 0.87, range [0-2]). PubMed articles constituted 70.6% (24/34) of Government websites, 70.8% (17/24) had a JAMA score of 4 and 20.8% (5/24) had a score of 3. CONCLUSION: Patients search the internet for information regarding diagnosis, treatment, and recovery of PCL injuries and are less interested in the details of the procedure, cost, and longevity of treatment. The low JAMA score reflects the heterogenous quality and transparency of online information. Physicians can use this information to help guide patient expectations pre- and post-operatively.

2.
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab ; 27: 33-39, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36593911

RESUMO

Background: Analytical methods to measure trace and toxic elements are essential to evaluate exposure and nutritional status. A ten-element panel was developed and validated for clinical testing in whole blood. Retrospective data analysis was conducted on patient samples performed at ARUP Laboratories. Methods: A method was developed and validated to quantify ten elements in whole blood by ICP-MS. Fifty microliters of sample were extracted with 950 µL of diluent containing 1 % ammonium hydroxide, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 1.75 % EDTA along with spiked internal standards. Four calibrators were used for each element and prepared in goat blood to match the patient specimen matrix. Samples were analyzed with an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS with a Cetac MVX 7100 µL Workstation autosampler. Results: The assay was linear for all elements with inter- and intra-assay imprecision less than or equal to 11% CV at the low end of the analytical measurement range (AMR) and less than or equal to 4% CV at the upper end of the AMR for all elements. Accuracy was checked with a minimum of 40 repeat patient samples, proficiency testing samples, and matrix-matched spikes. The linear slopes for the ten elements ranged from 0.94 to 1.03 with intercepts below the AMR and R2 ranging from 0.97 to 1.00. Conclusions: The multi-element panel was developed to analyze ten elements in whole blood to unify the sample preparation and increase batch run efficiency. The improved analytical method utilized matrix-matched calibrators for accurate quantification to meet regulatory requirements. The assay was validated according to guidelines for CLIA-certified clinical laboratories and was suitable for clinical testing to assess nutritional status and toxic exposure.

3.
Clin Biochem ; 82: 90-98, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32407718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laboratory testing for trace and toxic elements is important to diagnose metal toxicity and nutritional deficiency. There are several essential elements that are necessary for biological function and non-essential elements that can pose risk from exposure. Both essential and nonessential elements can be toxic if concentrations exceed a certain threshold. METHODS: An aliquot of serum was diluted in a diluent solution, which contained iridium (Ir) as the internal standard, gold (Au), 0.05% Triton X-100, and 1% nitric acid (HNO3). The diluted specimen was aspirated into an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer for quantitative elemental analysis of chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn). The sample was introduced into the instrument spray chamber to form aerosol droplets, then atomized and ionized in argon plasma. The ions exited the plasma, passed through the interface of the instrument, then arrived at the entrance of the collision cell where helium gas was introduced to remove polyatomic interferences by kinetic energy discrimination (KED). After exiting the collision cell, the ions were filtered by a quadrupole mass spectrometer. RESULTS: The analytical measurement range was determined specifically for each element. Imprecision was <20% CV for the lowest limit of quantification for each element and accuracy was within ±15%. CONCLUSIONS: This method was validated for the quantification of seven elements in serum to assess nutritional deficiency and toxicity. The multi-element panel by ICP-MS met the validation criteria for biological monitoring of trace and toxic elements in patient specimens.


Assuntos
Intoxicação por Metais Pesados/sangue , Desnutrição/sangue , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Metais Pesados/sangue , Selênio/sangue , Espectrofotometria Atômica/métodos , Oligoelementos/sangue , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Intoxicação por Metais Pesados/diagnóstico , Humanos , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
J Anal Toxicol ; 43(4): 284-290, 2019 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30476143

RESUMO

Heavy metals testing remains an ongoing challenge for diagnosing acute or chronic exposure to heavy metals. In this study, we determined the positivity rates of single element and panel testing for toxic elements, and evaluated the potential utility of an expanded detection protocol for screening of toxic element exposures. The retrospective analysis included data from urine (n = 19,343) and blood (n = 196,019) specimens tested using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury (blood), and arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc (urine). Lead industrial monitoring in blood and cadmium exposure in blood and urine were included to represent directed single element ordering. The percent of positive results, defined as results greater than the upper limit of the reference interval was determined. For blood, the highest positivity was observed for lead occupational exposure monitoring (26.2%) whereas for urine, the highest positivity was observed for zinc testing (28.1%). Remarkably, reanalysis using an expanded panel, of 120 blood and 174 urine specimens originally negative identified 42% (50 of 120) of the blood specimens with at least one elevated result and 48% (83 of 174) of the urine specimens with at least one elevated result. Our results indicate that a broad elemental screening panel may help ensure easier identification of elemental exposure and may eliminate the need for additional follow-up sample collections.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Metais Pesados/sangue , Metais Pesados/urina , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Doenças Assintomáticas , Intoxicação por Metais Pesados/diagnóstico , Humanos , Técnicas de Diluição do Indicador , Chumbo/sangue , Espectrometria de Massas , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Zinco/urina
5.
J Appl Lab Med ; 1(2): 143-151, 2016 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626787

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Platinating agents are among the most commonly used cytotoxic drugs worldwide. It is recognized that Pt concentration can remain significantly increased in serum up to 20 years after completion of chemotherapy, with levels related to late treatment effects. METHODS: A Freedom EVO® Tecan liquid handler was used for aliquoting 50 µL serum at 10-fold dilution into 96-well plates. The Teledyne MVX-7100 low-volume autosampler was used for sample introduction into an Agilent 7900 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. There was <1.2 min needed between injections. Time to completion for a maximum batch size using two 96-well plates was approximately 3.5 h, including preparation and analysis. RESULTS: Imprecision was <15%, and the limit of quantification was set at 5 ng/L based on imprecision of 18.3%. Bias based on fortified samples ranged from 0% to -4.3% within the analytical measurement range of 5-10 000 ng/L. The nonparametric reference interval for platinum in serum using 147 residual clinical samples was determined to be 8-47 ng/L. Serum platinum concentrations in 675 enrolled patients having an average time since chemotherapy completion of 6.4 (± 5.5 years) ranged from 20.1 to 8252.4 ng/L. Among all patients, 633 (94%) had serum concentrations exceeding 47 ng/L, and 42 (6%) had serum platinum concentrations between 8 and 47 ng/L. CONCLUSIONS: This method used an automated liquid handler, a novel 96-well autosampler and 50 µL patient serum to quantify platinum levels. The method was successfully validated according to current clinical guidelines for laboratory developed tests.

6.
J Virol Methods ; 221: 95-9, 2015 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25956671

RESUMO

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and genotyping is critical for cervical cancer screening. Testing of 967 cervical cytology specimens in PreservCyt preservative revealed similar positivity rates for HC2 (13.8%) and APTIMA HPV (AHPV) tests (13.5%, p=0.89) and high overall agreement (94.6%, κ=0.77). A trend towards higher HPV16 positivity rates by the Cobas HPV test (23.0%, 26/113) compared to the AHPV genotyping assay (19.5%, 22/113; p=0.125) was noted. No cross-contamination was detected with AHPV in a challenge experiment.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/virologia , Técnicas de Genotipagem/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/genética , Virologia/métodos
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(5): 1720-3, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24554756

RESUMO

The accurate detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) are critical for cervical cancer screening. The Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) and cobas HPV tests showed high agreement for cervical samples (94.4%, κ=0.72, n=693) and moderate agreement for vaginal samples (κ=0.62, n=108). The HPV16 and HPV18 results were highly consistent between the cobas and Linear Array tests (κ≥0.96, n=197). Three hc2-negative vaginal samples were repeatedly invalid by the cobas test due to ß-globin control failures, highlighting amplification control benefits. No cross-contamination was detected in a challenge experiment.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/virologia , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vagina/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , DNA Viral/genética , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Genótipo , Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos
8.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 27(3): 171-6, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23686774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The illumigene® (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) and GeneOhm® (BD Diagnostics, La Jolla, CA) Clostridium difficile assays target the tcdA gene and tcdB gene, respectively. We assessed the use of tcdA as the molecular target in the illumigene® C. difficile loop-mediated amplification assay in detecting a wide variety of C. difficile strains including those with tcdA deletions. METHODS: We tested 38 C. difficile strains and 108 patient stool specimens using the illumigene® assay. The GeneOhm® real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay served as the reference method. Discordant results were resolved by repeat testing, anaerobic culture, and a laboratory-developed real-time PCR targeting tcdA and tcdB. RESULTS: Both illumigene® and GeneOhm® assays detected all 37 C. difficile toxin B(+) strains representing seven toxinotypes and including four toxin A(-) B(+) isolates. No cross-reactivity with 20 other Clostridium species or toxin-negative C. difficile was observed in either assay. Among patient stool specimens, agreement was 94.4% (102/108). After discordant result resolution, agreement was 96.3% (104/108). Specimens with initially discordant results had target concentrations approaching the limit of detection for the two commercial assays. Discordance appeared unrelated to whether tcdA or tcdB was the amplification target. CONCLUSION: The tcdA 5' region used by the illumigene® assay is a practical target for toxigenic C. difficile detection.


Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Enterotoxinas/genética , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...