Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endovasc Ther ; 16 Suppl 1: I106-18, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19317572

RESUMO

One of the principal reasons for failure of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the occurrence of endoleaks, which regardless of size or type can transmit systemic pressure to the aneurysm sac. There is little debate that type I endoleaks (poor proximal or distal sealing) are associated with continued risk of aneurysm rupture and require treatment. Similarly, with type III endoleak, there is agreement that the defect in the device needs to be addressed; however, what to do with type II endoleaks and their effect on long-term outcome are not so clear. Aneurysm sac change is a primary parameter for determining the presence of an endoleak and assessing its impact. While diameter measurement has been the most commonly used method for determining sac changes, volume measurement has now been proven superior for monitoring structural changes in the 3-dimensional sac. Determining the source of an endoleak and the direction of flow are necessary for proper classification; however, while computed tomographic angiography has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting endoleaks, it is limited in its ability to show the direction of flow. Contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasound, on the other hand, is better able to quantify flow and characterize endoleaks. Flow is evidence of pressure, and increasing intrasac pressure increases wall tension, thus inducing progressive aneurysm expansion until rupture. Hence, determining intrasac pressure is becoming a vital component of endoleak assessment. All endoleaks can create systemic pressure inside the aneurysm sac, and there are a variety of intrasac pressure transducers being evaluated to assess this effect. A clinical pathway for patients with suspected type II endoleaks is based on a combination of imaging and pressure measurements. Imaging alone requires at least two interval examinations to determine the trend, while pressure measurements give immediate reassurance or an indication to intervene. Although still under development, pressure measurement is destined for general use and will provide a scientific basis for the management of type II endoleaks.


Assuntos
Aneurisma/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Falha de Prótese , Stents , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma/fisiopatologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Pressão , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Transdutores de Pressão , Falha de Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...