RTOG 0518: randomized phase III trial to evaluate zoledronic acid for prevention of osteoporosis and associated fractures in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: RTOG 0518 evaluated the potential benefit of zoledronic acid therapy in preventing bone fractures for patients with high grade and/or locally advanced, non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Eligible patients with T-scores of the hip (<-1.0, but >-2.5 vs >-1.0) and negative bone scans were prospectively randomized to either zoledronic acid, 4 mg, concurrently with the start of RT and then every six months for a total of 6 infusions (Arm 1) or observation (Arm 2). Vitamin D and calcium supplements were given to all patients. Secondary objectives included quality of life (QOL) and bone mineral density (BMD) changes over a period of three years. RESULTS: Of 109 patients accrued before early closure, 96 were eligible. Median follow-up was 36.3 months for Arm 1 and 34.8 months for Arm 2. Only two patients experienced a bone fracture (one in each arm) resulting in no difference in freedom from any bone fracture (P=0.95), nor in QOL. BMD percent changes from baseline to 36 months were statistically improved with the use of zoledronic acid compared to observation for the lumbar spine (6% vs -5%, P<0.0001), left total hip (1% vs -8%, P=0.0002), and left femoral neck (3% vs -8%, P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with advanced, non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving LHRH agonist and RT, the use of zoledronic acid was associated with statistically improved BMD percent changes. The small number of accrued patients resulted in decreased statistical power to detect any differences in the incidence of bone fractures or QOL.

Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy augments cure and long-term cancer control in men with poor prognosis, nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Historically, adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy has been viewed as a palliative treatment option for patients with poor-prognosis non-metastatic prostate cancer. In addition, guidelines from bodies such as the European Association of Urology and American Society for Clinical Oncology do not specifically categorize adjuvant hormonal therapy as being curative in intent. We propose that adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy should now be classified as a treatment of curative intent in patients with poor-prognosis, non-metastatic prostate cancer. By applying a carefully considered definition of cure (based on long-term (10- to 15-year) disease-free survival curves) to the findings from randomized controlled clinical trials that have studied adjuvant hormonal treatments in non-metastatic prostate cancer, we challenged whether this viewpoint should now be considered redundant. According to our review of relevant studies and our definition of cure, goserelin appears to augment cure in a sizeable proportion of men with poor-prognosis non-metastatic prostate cancer when given adjuvant to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Across several trials, the relevant survival curves for the goserelin-treated population became indefinitely flat after long-term follow-up. This indicates that these patients have a mortality risk comparable to the general population without prostate cancer. On the basis of the evidence presented within this review, we believe that, given it can control disease for a long period of time, adjuvant goserelin should be reclassified as a treatment of curative intent for patients with poor-prognosis non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Designing equivalent treatment regimens for prostate radiotherapy based on equivalent uniform dose.

The purpose of this work was to determine alternative radiotherapy (RT) regimens that are biologically equivalent to clinically proven treatments using different RT modalities or different fractionation schemes. The concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is used with the linear quadratic model to determine equivalent treatment regimens using two representative sets of parameters derived from clinical data: (i) alpha/beta = 3.1 Gy and alpha = 0.15 Gy(-1), and (ii) alpha/beta = 1.5 Gy and alpha = 0.04 Gy(-1). The EUD values for the critical structure (rectum) are also calculated. Representative dose volume histograms were used to account for dose inhomogeneities for different RT modalities. A series of alternative and equivalent fractionation regimens that can be used with different radiotherapy modalities for localized prostate cancer were determined. For example, the alternative regimens, calculated with the alpha/beta ratio of 3.1 Gy, that would be biologically equivalent to external beam RT (EBRT) of 76 Gy (38x2.0 Gy) include: EBRT hypofractionation of 21x3.0 Gy; I-125 implant of 156 Gy; Pd-103 implant of 128 Gy; high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of 4x10.5 Gy; I-125 implant of 65 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy; and HDR brachytherapy of 3x5.9 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy. Similar data for other parameters are also presented. With caution, the data presented may be useful in designing clinical trials to explore new RT strategies, such as image-guided intensity-modulated RT.

Ki-67 staining is a strong predictor of distant metastasis and mortality for men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 92-02.

PURPOSE: The Ki-67 staining index (Ki67-SI) has been associated with prostate cancer patient outcome; however, few studies have involved radiotherapy (RT) -treated patients. The association of Ki67-SI to local failure (LF), biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific death (CSD) and overall death (OD) was determined in men randomly assigned to short term androgen deprivation (STAD) + RT or long-term androgen deprivation (LTAD) + RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 537 patients (35.5%) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 92-02 who had sufficient tissue for Ki67-SI analysis. Median follow-up was 96.3 months. Ki67-SI cut points of 3.5% and 7.1% were previously found to be related to patient outcome and were examined here in a Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis (MVA). Ki67-SI was also tested as a continuous variable. Covariates were dichotomized in accordance with stratification and randomization criteria. RESULTS: Median Ki67-SI was 6.5% (range, 0% to 58.2%). There was no difference in the distribution of patients in the Ki-67 analysis cohort (n = 537) and the other patients in RTOG 92-02 (n = 977) by any of the covariates or end points tested. In MVAs, Ki67-SI (continuous) was associated with LF (P =.08), BF (P =.0445), DM (P <.0001), CSD (P <.0001), and OD (P =.0094). When categoric variables were used in MVAs, the 3.5% Ki67-SI cut point was not significant. The 7.1% cut point was related to BF (P =.09), DM (P =.0008), and CSD (P =.017). Ki67-SI was the most significant correlate of DM and CSD. A detailed analysis of the hazard rates for DM in all possible covariate combinations revealed subgroups of patients treated with STAD + RT that did not require LTAD. CONCLUSION: Ki67-SI was the most significant determinant of DM and CSD and was also associated with OD. The Ki67-SI should be considered for the stratification of patients in future trials.

Thyrotoxicosis after complete or partial lithium withdrawal in two patients with bipolar affective disorder.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight and discuss thyrotoxicosis after lithium withdrawal as a potential complication of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder. CASE REPORTS: Both patients presented developed thyrotoxicosis, the first patient after stopping the lithium completely, and the second patient after a reduction in the lithium dose. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of thyrotoxicosis emerging when lithium is being completely or partially withdrawn. Such withdrawal could unmask a latent hyperthyroidism.

Prostate cancer DNA ploidy and response to salvage hormone therapy after radiotherapy with or without short-term total androgen blockade: an analysis of RTOG 8610.

PURPOSE: DNA ploidy has consistently been found to be a correlate of prostate cancer patient outcome. However, a minority of studies have used pretreatment diagnostic material and have involved radiotherapy (RT)-treated patients. In this retrospective study, the predictive value of DNA ploidy was evaluated in patients entered into Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8610. The protocol treatment randomization was RT alone versus RT plus short-course (approximately 4 months) neoadjuvant and concurrent total androgen blockade (RT+TAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 149 patients, of whom 74 received RT alone and 75 received RT+TAB. DNA content was determined by image analysis of Feulgen stained tissue sections; 94 patients were diploid and 55 patients were nondiploid. Kaplan-Meier univariate survival, the cumulative incidence method, and Cox proportional hazards multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the relationship of DNA ploidy to distant metastasis and overall survival. RESULTS: DNA nondiploidy was not associated with any of the other prognostic factors in univariate analyses. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, 5-year overall survival was 70% for those with diploid tumors and 42% for nondiploid tumors. Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that nondiploidy was independently associated with reduced overall survival. No correlation was observed between DNA ploidy and distant metastasis. The diminished survival in the absence of an increase in distant metastasis was related to a reduction in the effect of salvage androgen ablation; patients treated initially with RT+TAB and who had nondiploid tumors had reduced survival after salvage androgen ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Nondiploidy was associated with shorter survival, which seemed to be related to reduced response to salvage hormone therapy for those previously exposed to short-term TAB.

Loss of renal function following bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of angiotensin converting enzyme D/I polymorphism and other clinical risk factors.

Chronic renal failure is an acknowledged late complication of BMT. It is related to the intensive chemotherapy, radiation and supporting medications. Polymorphism in the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene is associated with progression of nephropathy caused by diabetes and IgA nephropathy. We sought to determine whether ACE genotype and other clinical factors were associated with loss of renal function after BMT. We determined the genotype of 106 adult allogeneic BMT recipients, who received a similar preparative regimen, survived 1 year, and had assessment of renal function up to 3 years after BMT. We found that the distribution of genotypes was similar to the general population; 29%, 51%, and 20% for the DD, DI, and II genotypes, respectively. There was no statistical difference in patient survival between the three groups. Among all patients, the average creatinine clearance declined from 124 (95% CI 117, 131) to 89 (95% CI 78, 100) ml/min over the 36 months after BMT. Decline in renal function over time was less for patients with the DD compared to the II genotype (P = 0.040). Renal function in patients with the DD genotype was also better than those with the DI genotype, but this was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.055). Renal shielding reduced decline in renal function compared to no shielding (P = 0.026). We conclude that the ACE genotype does not seem to influence survival, but the DD genotype may be protective against renal injury after BMT. Furthermore, we confirm that renal shielding during TBI reduces the renal injury after BMT.

Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To determine the potential advantage of androgen ablation following standard external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced (clinical or pathologic T3; clinical or pathologic node positive) carcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 1987 the RTOG initiated a Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients were accrued to the study of which 945 remain analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant hormone arm (Arm I); and 468 on the radiation only arm (Arm II) with hormones initiated at relapse. The initial results were reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1997. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 5.6 years for all patients and 6.0 years for living patients local failure at 8 years was 23% for Arm I and 37% for Arm II (p < 0.0001). Distant metastasis was likewise favorably impacted with the immediate use of hormonal manipulation with a distant metastasis rate in Arm I of 27% and 37% in Arm II (p < 0.0001). Disease-free survival (NED survival) and NED survival with PSA of 1.5 ng/mL (bNED) or less were both statistically significant in favor of the immediate hormone arm (both p < 0.0001). Cause-specific failure was not statistically different with a cause-specific failure of 16% for Arm I and 21% in Arm II (p = 0.23). Overall survival was likewise not statistically different between two arms, with a 49% overall survival at 8 years in Arm I and 47% in Arm II (p = 0.36). Subset analysis of centrally reviewed Gleason 8-10 patients who did not undergo prostatectomy showed that for patients receiving radiation therapy plus adjuvant hormones there was a statistically significant improvement in both absolute (p = 0.036) and cause-specific survival (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Use of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to definitive radiation therapy results in a highly significant improvement in regards to local control, freedom from distant metastasis, and biochemical free survival in unfavorable prognosis patients with carcinoma of the prostate.

Subset analysis of RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 indicates an advantage for long-term vs. short-term adjuvant hormones for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The benefit of adjuvant hormones in prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiation therapy (RT) in RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 has previously been reported. This analysis excludes those patients with positive lymph nodes or postprostatectomy to determine the benefit of adjuvant hormones in men with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving definitive RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine hundred ninety-three eligible patients from RTOG 85-31 and 86-10 treated between 1987-1992 were included in this study. Five hundred seventy-five patients with T3N0M0 disease were included from RTOG 85-31 and 418 patients with T2b-T4N0M0 disease from RTOG 86-10. Patients randomized to receive long-term hormones (LTH) on 85-31 received goserelin starting the last week of RT and continued indefinitely. Patients treated with short-term hormones (STH) on 86-10 received goserelin and flutamide 2 months prior to and during RT. The median follow-up for all patients in this analysis was 71 months (range, 0.6-129 months). RESULTS: Combining both studies, statistically significant improvements in outcome were observed between the RT and hormones (I) and RT alone (II) groups for biochemical disease-free survival (bNED control) and distant metastases failure (DMF). Statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF and cause-specific failure (CSF) were observed for patients receiving LTH compared with STH. In those patients receiving LTH, the benefit in bNED control (p = 0.0002), DMF (p = 0.05), and CSF (p = 0.02) was limited to centrally reviewed Gleason score of 7 and 8-10 tumors. For all patients treated on 85-31, statistically significant improvements for bNED control, DMF, and CSF were observed between Group I and II. Multivariate analysis demonstrated Gleason score and the use of LTH to be independent predictors for bNED control (p < 0.0001), DMF (p < 0.0001), and CSF (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, adjuvant long-term hormones compared to short-term hormones resulted in statistically significant improvements in bNED control, DMF, and CSF rates for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with D1 (pN+) adenocarcinoma of the prostate (results based on a national prospective randomized trial, RTOG 85-31). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation vs. radiation alone on a group of pathologically staged lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A national prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-31) of standard external beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression vs. external beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three of the patients in this trial had biopsy-proven pathologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight of these patients received radiation plus the immediate androgen suppression (LHRH agonist), while 75 received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse. RESULTS: With a median followup of 4.9 years, estimated progression-free survival with PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at 5 years was 55% for the patients who received radiation plus immediate LHRH agonist vs. 11% of the patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at relapse (p = 0.0001). Because all of these patients had locally advanced disease (i.e., pathologically positive lymph nodes), stage does not explain this difference in outcome, and Gleason grade was not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated absolute survival at 5 years for the radiation and LHRH group was 73 vs. 65% for the radiation alone group who received androgen suppression at relapse. Estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 82% for the radiation and immediate LHRH agonist group and 77% for the radiation-alone group. CONCLUSION: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pN+ or clinical stage D1) should be seriously considered for external beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation over radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at the time of relapse.

Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31.

PURPOSE: Although androgen suppression results in a tumor response/remission in the majority of patients with carcinoma of the prostate, its potential value as an adjuvant has not been substantiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1987, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients had been accessioned to the study. Of these, 945 remained analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant arm and 468 on the observation arm. RESULTS: Actuarial projections show that at 5 years, 84% of patients on the adjuvant goserelin arm and 71% on the observation arm remain without evidence of local recurrence (P < .0001). The corresponding figures for freedom from distant metastases and disease-free survival are 83% versus 70% (P < .001) and 60% and 44% (P < .0001). If prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 1.5 ng is included as a failure (after > or = 1 year), the 5-year disease-free survival rate on the adjuvant goserelin arm is 53% versus 20% on the observation arm (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rate (for the entire population) is 75% on the adjuvant arm versus 71% on the observation arm (P = .52). However, in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, the difference in actuarial 5-year survival (66% on the adjuvant goserelin arm v 55% on the observation arm) reaches statistical significance (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Application of androgen suppression as an adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control and freedom from disease progression. At this point, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, a significant improvement in survival has been observed only in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10.

p53 status and prognosis of locally advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma: a study based on RTOG 8610.

BACKGROUND: The p53 tumor suppressor gene (also known as TP53) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. Several studies have shown that p53 mutations are infrequent in prostate cancer and are associated with advanced disease. PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic value of identifying abnormal p53 protein expression in the tumors of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated with either external-beam radiation therapy alone or total androgen blockade before and during the radiation therapy. METHODS: The study population consisted of a subset of patients entered in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8610 ("a phase III trial of Zoladex and flutamide used as cytoreductive agents in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy"). Immunohistochemical detection of abnormal p53 protein in pretreatment specimens (i.e., needle biopsies or transurethral resections) was achieved by use of the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody DO7; specimens in which 20% or more of the tumor cell nuclei showed positive immunoreactivity were considered to have abnormal p53 protein expression. Associations between p53 protein expression status and the time to local progression, the incidence of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated in univariate (logrank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards model) analyses. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine (27%) of the 471 patients entered in the trial had sufficient tumor material for analysis. Abnormal p53 protein expression was detected in the tumors of 23 (18%) of these 129 patients. Statistically significant associations were found between the presence of abnormal p53 protein expression and increased incidence of distant metastases (P = .04), decreased progression-free survival (P = .03), and decreased overall survival (P = .02); no association was found between abnormal p53 protein expression and the time to local progression (P = .58). These results were independent of the Gleason score and clinical stage. A significant treatment interaction was detected with respect to the development of distant metastases: Among patients receiving both radiation therapy and hormone therapy, those with tumors exhibiting abnormal p53 protein expression experienced a reduced time to the development of distant metastases (P = .001); for patients treated with radiation therapy alone, the time to distant metastases was unrelated to p53 protein expression status (P = .91). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of p53 protein expression status yield significant, independent prognostic information concerning the development of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who are treated primarily with radiation therapy. IMPLICATIONS: The interaction of radiation therapy plus hormone therapy and abnormal p53 protein expression may provide a clinical link to experimental evidence that radiation therapy and/or hormone therapy act, at least in part, by the induction of apoptosis (a cell death program) and suggests that this mechanism may be blocked in patients whose tumors have p53 mutations.

Long-term results of selective renal shielding in patients undergoing total body irradiation in preparation for bone marrow transplantation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of partial renal shielding used in conjunction with total body irradiation (TBI) on the incidence of bone marrow transplantation nephropathy (BMT Np) seen as a late sequelae after transplantation. Of 402 patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT) at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) 157 were greater than 18 years of age, received 14 Gy TBI and survived at least 100 days post-transplant. The incidence of BMT nephropathy was evaluated in these patients by dose to the kidneys. In the 72 patients who received 14 Gy TBI with no renal shielding, the actuarial risk of developing BMT Np at 2 1/2 years (30 months) post-BMT was 29 +/- 7%. Sixty-eight patients received 14 Gy TBI with partial renal shielding of 15% (renal dose = 11.9 Gy), the actuarial risk of developing BMT Np was 14 +/- 5% at 2 1/2 years. Seventeen patients received 14 Gy TBI with renal shielding of 30% (renal dose = 9.8 Gy); none of this group have developed BMT Np despite a median follow-up of over 2 1/2 years (985 days). The trend of decreasing BMT Np with increasing shielding is statistically significant (P = 0.012). Prognostic factors such as age, type of transplant and good-risk vs poor-risk disease status were evaluated and were similar in each cohort of patients described above. We conclude that given the statistically significant benefit seen here in the reduced incidence of BMT Np by the use of selective renal shielding, this should be seriously considered for all patients who receive TBI, but especially for patients whose renal doses exceed 10 Gy.

Recombinant human interferon-beta (rHuIFN-beta) and radiation therapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Fifteen patients with stage II, IIIA, and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received subcutaneous (s.c.) recombinant, glycosylated, human interferon-beta 1a (Rebif; rHuIFN-beta 1a) on each day of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) given in 2.0 Gy fractions to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. The rHuIFN-beta 1a was generated in CHO cells by recombinant DNA technology and is identical to natural IFN-beta produced by fibroblasts in primary sequence and glycosylation. Cohorts of three patients each were treated with escalating doses of rHuIFN-beta 1a: 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day. Acute toxicity was assessed according to modified WHO criteria; late toxicity was graded using RTOG late toxicity criteria. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of rHuIFN-beta 1a was defined as the dose level immediately below that in which dose-limiting toxicity occurred in > or = two of six patients. Immunomodulatory effects and antigenicity of rHuIFN-beta 1a were assessed by 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin levels and by measurement of anti-rHuIFN-beta antibodies, respectively. Fourteen of fifteen patients experienced grades 1-3 acute (early) toxicity (< or = 90 days), which was primarily gastrointestinal: dysphagia/esophagitis (14/15), nausea/vomiting (12/15), anorexia (7/15), and liver transaminasemia (6/15). One of three patients treated with 24 MIU/m2 per treatment day (total rHuIFN-beta 1a dose 672 MIU) died of complications secondary to pneumonia, sepsis, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and radiation pneumonitis. Twelve patients were evaluable for late toxicity (> 90 days). Maximum toxicity was grade 0 in five patients, grade 1 in four patients, and grade 5 in one patient (radiation pneumonitis). Clinical responses from the combination were 1/15 CR, 6/15 PR, 6/15 stable disease, and 1/15 progressive disease. The MTD of rHuIFN-beta 1a has been estimated at 12 MIU/m2 per treatment day when given daily during conventional RT to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. Biologic response by rHuIFN-beta 1a alone was reflected by significant and dose-related increases in 2-5A synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin, and neopterin. Radiation therapy alone had no effect on these immune response parameters and did not diminish their augmentation by rHuIFN-beta 1a. There was no association of biologic modulation with clinical response or survival.

Results of a phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole (SR 2508) for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (RTOG Protocol 90-20).

PURPOSE: RTOG Protocol 90-20 was designed to evaluate the effect of the hypoxic cell sensitizer Etanidazole (SR-2508) on locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with concurrent external beam irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with locally advanced T2b, T3, and T4 tumors were eligible for this study. No patients with disease beyond the pelvis were eligible. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was mandatory. All patients received definitive external beam irradiation using standard four-field whole pelvis treatment to 45-50 Gy, followed by a cone down with a minimum total dose to the prostate of 66 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction over 6.5-7.5 weeks. Etanidazole was delivered 1.8 g/m2 given 3 times a week to a total of 34.2 g/m2 or 19 doses. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were entered onto the study. Three patients refused treatment; therefore, 36 patients were eligible for further evaluation. Median follow-up was 36.9 months from treatment end. All patients had elevated initial PSA levels, and 18 patients had PSAs of > 20 ng/ml. Tumor classification was T2, 12 patients (33.3%); T3, 22 patients (61.1%); and T4, 2 patients (5.6%). Complete clinical response, defined as PSA < 4 ng/ml and complete clinical disappearance, was attained in 17.9% of (5/28 pts) with information at 90 days and 56% of patients by 12 months following treatment. Relapse-free survival was 13% at 3 years with PSA < 4 ng/ml. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities, either acute (during treatment) or in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial regarding PSA response and clinical disappearance of disease are similar to historical controls and do not warrant further investigation of etanidazole as was done in this trial. Drug toxicity that, in the past, has been unacceptably high with other hypoxic cell sensitizers does not appear to be a significant problem with this drug.

Pulmonary function changes in long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate long-term pulmonary function changes in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT), to assess their clinical significance, and to identify factors influencing these changes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were evaluated before and after BMT in 111 adult patients undergoing BMT between 1985 and 1991. Forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity (DLCO), and total lung capacity (TLC) were evaluated. One hundred and three patients (92.8%) received total body irradiation (TBI) to a total dose of 14 Gy in nine equal fractions. The lung dose was restricted to < 6.5 Gy in 95% of patients with partial transmission lung shielding. Seventy-eight percent of patients had acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), 69% chronic graft-vs.-host disease (cGVHD), and 63% posttransplant pulmonary infection. Effects of GVHD, TBI, radiation dose to the lungs, dose rate of TBI, posttransplant pulmonary infection, Busulfan use for conditioning, age, and history of smoking were evaluated for their influence on pulmonary function. RESULTS: Posttransplant FEV1, FVC, and TLC were lower than pretransplant values (p < 0.05) at 6 months and 1 year posttransplant with subsequent recovery. DLCO was significantly lower at all posttransplant intervals. FEV1 did not fall significantly in patients without acute or chronic GVHD and recovered earlier than in patients without posttransplant pulmonary infection. Recovery of FVC, TLC, and DLCO was also delayed in patients with acute and chronic GVHD and posttransplant pulmonary infection. Multiple regression analysis revealed an association between a higher radiation dose to the lungs, and decreased FVC at 2 years (p = 0.01). Progressive obstructive pulmonary disease was not observed. CONCLUSION: An initial decline in PFTs with subsequent recovery was observed. Factors associated with delayed recovery and incomplete recovery of PFTs were GVHD, posttransplant pulmonary infection, and higher radiation dose to the lungs. The conditioning regimen used at Medical College of Wisconsin, including relatively high TBI doses with partial transmission pulmonary shielding, appears to be well tolerated by the lungs in long-term survivors. No progressive decline in PFTs or symptomatic decline in pulmonary function was observed during the time interval studied.

Androgen deprivation with radiation therapy compared with radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostatic carcinoma: a randomized comparative trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: Androgen deprivation therapy before and during radiation therapy could, by reducing tumor volume, increase local tumor control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the prostate. METHODS: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with large T2, T3, and T4 prostate tumors, but no evidence of osseous metastasis, were randomized to receive goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks and flutamide 250 mg orally three times daily 2 months before and during the radiation therapy course (Arm I) compared with radiation therapy alone (Arm II). Pelvic irradiation was administered with 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per day to a total dose of 45 +/- 1 Gy followed by a boost to the prostate target volume to a total dose of 65 to 70 Gy. RESULTS: Of 471 randomized patients, 456 were evaluable, 226 on Arm I and 230 on Arm II. With a median potential follow-up of 4.5 years, the cumulative incidence of local progression at 5 years was 46% in Arm I and 71% in Arm II (P < 0.001). The 5-year incidence of distant metastasis on Arms I and II was 34% and 41%, respectively (P = 0.09). Progression-free survival rates including normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for 396 patients with at least one PSA recorded were 36% in Arm I and 15% in Arm II at 5 years (P < 0.001). At this time, no significant difference in overall survival could be detected (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term androgen deprivation with radiation therapy results in a marked increase in local control and disease-free survival compared with pelvic irradiation alone in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Long-term surveillance is required to assess effects on overall survival.

Bone marrow transplant nephropathy: radiation nephritis revisited.

Late-onset renal failure occurs in up to 20% of survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Total body irradiation is a major factor in this syndrome, so-called bone marrow transplant nephropathy (BMT NP), which is defined by disproportionate anemia, hypertension, and azotemia. Previous or concurrent chemotherapy may potentiate the effect of radiation on the kidney. Kidney function may decline acutely or more gradually, with eventual long-term stabilization. Patient survival is associated with control of the blood pressure. BMT NP is a recognized complication of bone marrow transplantation, which will require ongoing attention.