Predictive value of past and current screening tests for syphilis in blood donors: changing from a rapid plasma reagin test to an automated specific treponemal test for screening.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the change from a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test to an automated specific treponemal test (PK-TP) in screening for syphilis in blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional seroprevalence analysis was performed on 4,878,215 allogeneic blood donations from 19 American Red Cross Blood Services regions from May 1993 through September 1995. Positive predictive values relative to the confirmatory fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS) were calculated. Differences in seroprevalence were compared in RPR and PK-TP tests for 1) unconfirmed and confirmed tests, 2) first-time and repeat donors, and 3) "recent" versus "past" infections. Donation data from three additional Red Cross regions were evaluated for repeat donation patterns of blood donors who had a donation that was positive in a serologic screening test for syphilis. The value of RPR and PK-TP tests as surrogate markers for HIV infection was compared. RESULTS: Reactive rates were lower but the positive predictive values was higher for the PK-TP test than for the RPR test. Initially, donors screened by PK-TP were more likely to be confirmed as positive than were donors screened by RPR, but these rates became comparable. It is estimated that a single HIV window-period donation was removed by serologic testing for syphilis each year of this study period. CONCLUSIONS: The change to the PK-TP test resulted in a lower repeatedly reactive rate, better prediction that a confirmed-positive test for syphilis would occur in testing in the FTA-ABS, fewer donations lost, and comparable deferral rates. Because of the high rate of reactivity to serologic testing for syphilis among donors previously confirmed positive for syphilis, indefinite deferral after a confirmed-positive index donation may be warranted. Serologic testing for syphilis is ineffective as a marker of HIV-infectious window-period donations.

False-positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 western blot tests in noninfected blood donors.

BACKGROUND: The manufacturers' criteria for a positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Western blot (WB) test were recently revised to require reactivity to only two of the following bands: p24, gp41, and gp120/160. In a recent report, low-risk blood donors were identified in whom nonspecific reactivity to multiple env antigens in WB testing resulted in apparently false-positive WBs by these criteria. The present study was conducted to verify the existence of false-positive WBs among noninfected donors and to assess the extent of this problem. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four donors classified as WB-positive on the basis of env-only (3 cases) or p24/env-only (1 case) patterns were investigated. Index and/or follow-up specimens were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), by overlapping recombinant env antigens and synthetic peptides in enzyme immunoassays, and by deglycosylated and denatured antigen WBs. WB records from American Red Cross blood centers were reviewed to determine the frequency of env-only and p24/env-only patterns, relative to all positive WBs, from 1988 through 1993. RESULTS: The four index-case donors denied risk and had stable WB reactivity during follow-up. HIV PCR was negative in all. Env reactivity was restricted to nonglycosylated gp41 epitopes; no gp120-specific reactivity was detected. For three of the four donors, env reactivity was mapped to a 20-amino acid N-terminal epitope of gp41. The rate of detecting WBs with these false-positive patterns increased from 0.6 percent of all positive WBs from 1988 to 1990 (4/776) to 8 percent in 1991 and 1992 (52/683), and then it declined to 6 percent in 1992 and 1993 (47/783). Env-only patterns predominated in 1991 and 1992, whereas p24/env-only patterns were more frequent following implementation of combined anti-HIV-1/HIV type 2 enzyme immunoassays in 1992. CONCLUSION: Low-risk blood donors can have false-positive results on WB tests. Increased detection of env-only and p24/env-only WBs appears related to the enhanced sensitivity of newer enzyme immunoassays to gp41 and p24 antibodies. Donors with these patterns should undergo follow-up testing to document the presence or absence of HIV infection.

Pooling blood donor samples to reduce the cost of HIV-1 antibody testing.

Accurate, low cost testing of donated blood is a goal of the global effort to reduce the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). We describe a modified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for detecting HIV-1 antibody (anti-HIV-1) in 15-sample pools. In this preliminary study, the modified EIA was as sensitive for detecting weakly seropositive samples, and as specific for testing HIV-1 Western blot-negative or Western blot-indeterminate results, as testing individual samples by the standard EIA. A simulation of field operations was conducted using pools of blood donor samples collected in the United States and in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Implementation of the modified EIA method and testing 15-sample pools for anti-HIV-1 is a reliable strategy for reducing the cost of large scale testing of donated blood for anti-HIV-1 in areas of low seroprevalence.