A gender-specific blood-based gene expression score for assessing obstructive coronary artery disease in nondiabetic patients: results of the Personalized Risk Evaluation and Diagnosis in the Coronary Tree (PREDICT) trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently available noninvasive tests to risk stratify patients for obstructive coronary disease result in many unnecessary cardiac catheterizations, especially in women. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of presenting symptoms, noninvasive test results, and a gene expression score (GES) in identifying obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) according to gender, using quantitative coronary angiography as the criterion standard. METHODS: The PREDICT trial is a prospective multicenter observational study designed to develop and validate gene expression algorithms to assess obstructive CAD, defined as at least one ≥50% diameter stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization with suspected but previously unknown CAD were enrolled. Noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was available in 60% of patients. The GES, comprising gender-specific age functions and 6 gene expression terms containing 23 genes, was performed for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,160 consecutive patients (57.6% men and 42.4% women) were enrolled in PREDICT. The prevalence of obstructive CAD was 46.7% in men and 22.0% in women. Chest pain symptoms were a discriminator of obstructive CAD in men (P < .001) but not in women. The positive predictive value of MPI was significantly higher in men (45%) than in women (22%). An abnormal site-read MPI was not significantly associated with obstructive or severity of CAD. The GES was significantly associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of obstructive CAD for every 10-point increment in the GES and had a significant association with all measures of severity and burden of CAD. By multivariable analysis, GES was an independent predictor of obstructive CAD in the overall population (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, P = .001) and in the male (OR 1.99, P = .001) and female (OR 3.45, P = .001) subgroups separately, whereas MPI was not. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used diagnostic approaches including symptom evaluation and MPI performed less well in women than in men for identifying significant CAD. In contrast, gender-specific GES performed similarly in women and men. Gene expression score offers a reliable diagnostic approach for the assessment of nondiabetic patients and, in particular, women with suspected obstructive CAD.

Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in the SPIRIT III randomized trial at three years.

Routine angiographic follow-up after bare-metal stent implantation has been associated with an increase in coronary revascularization. The impact of angiographic follow-up after drug-eluting stent placement remains poorly characterized. The prospective, randomized, single-blinded SPIRIT III trial assigned patients to the everolimus-eluting stent or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization [ID-TLR]) at 3 years were assessed by angiographic versus clinical-only follow-up at 8 months ± 28 days and a landmark survival analysis from 9 months to 3 years. Of 1,002 patients, 564 patients were assigned to angiographic follow-up at 8 months ± 28 days and 438 patients underwent clinical follow-up alone. Three-year major adverse cardiovascular event rates were 10.6% in the angiographic group and 12.0% in the clinical follow-up group (p = 0.64). Ischemia-driven revascularization increased twofold at 9 months, but no difference was noted in ID-TLR for either device. Non-ID-TLR was significantly higher in patients in the angiographic group (4.5% vs 1.0%, p = 0.002), a difference resulting from PES (9.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.0007) rather than everolimus-eluting stent (2.2% vs 1.1%, p = 0.36) treatment. The landmark analysis showed no significant differences between the angiographic and clinical follow-up groups from 9 months to 3 years of major clinical outcomes. In conclusion, routine angiographic follow-up in SPIRIT III did not increase rates of ID-TLR compared to clinical follow-up alone. Despite higher nonischemia-driven revascularization rates with angiographic follow-up of patients with PESs, none of the safety end points were adversely affected.

Comparison of clinical and angiographic prognostic risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY (ACUITY) trial.

BACKGROUND: Several prognostic risk scores have been developed for patients with coronary artery disease, but their comparative use in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been examined. We therefore investigated the accuracy of the Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, Clinical Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score (CSS), New Risk Stratification (NERS) score (NERS), Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score, Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score for risk assessment of 1-year mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis in patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI. METHODS: The 6 scores were determined in 2,094 patients with NSTEACS treated with PCI enrolled in the angiographic substudy of the ACUITY trial. The prognostic accuracy of the 6 scores was assessed using the c statistic for discrimination and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration. The index of separation and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were also determined. RESULTS: Scores incorporating clinical and angiographic variables (CSS and NERS) showed the best tradeoff between discrimination and calibration for most end points, with the best discrimination for all end points and good calibration for most of them. The CSS had the best index of separation for most ischemic endpoints and displayed an NRI for cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) compared to the other scores, whereas NERS displayed an NRI for all-cause death and target vessel revascularization. The 3 scores-CSS, NERS, and SYNTAX-were the only scores to have both good discrimination and calibration for cardiac mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI, risk scores incorporating clinical and angiographic variables had the highest predictive accuracy for a broad spectrum of ischemic end points.

Gender and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis, plaque composition, and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the extent and composition of atherosclerosis contributing to acute coronary syndrome events in women compared with men. BACKGROUND: Pathological studies suggest that plaque composition and burden may differ by sex. It is unclear whether sex impacts the extent, characteristics, and potential vulnerability of coronary plaques. METHODS: A total of 697 patients (24% women) with acute coronary syndromes were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) study. Three-vessel multimodality intracoronary imaging (quantitative coronary angiography, grayscale, and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]) was performed after treatment of the culprit lesion(s). Events during a median 3.4-year follow-up were ascribed to recurrent culprit versus untreated nonculprit lesions. The authors performed a post hoc, sex-based subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Women were older and had more comorbid disease than men. By angiography, women had a similar number of angiographic culprit (p = 0.53) but fewer nonculprit (p = 0.05) lesions, and fewer vessels with nonculprit lesions (p = 0.048) compared with men even after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.002). By IVUS, women had fewer nonculprit lesions (p = 0.002), but similar plaque burden (PB) per lesion (55.6% vs. 55.3%; p = 0.35), and female sex was not predictive of severe (> 70%) PB (p = 0.052). Plaque rupture was less common in women (6.6% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.002) even after adjusting for comorbidities (p = 0.004), as was the total necrotic core volume (p < 0.0001). The frequency of other plaque phenotypes was similar for men and women including pathological intimal thickening, thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA), and thick-cap fibroatheromas. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events attributed to culprit and nonculprit lesions at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up were not significantly different between men and women, although women were rehospitalized more frequently due to culprit lesion-related angina. For men, nonculprit lesion minimal lumen area ≤ 4.0 mm(2), PB ≥70%, and TCFA predicted nonculprit MACE at 3 years, whereas for women, only TCFA and PB were predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The PROSPECT study validates that despite having more comorbid risk factors than men, women have less extensive coronary artery disease by both angiographic and IVUS measures, and that lesions in women compared with men have less plaque rupture, less necrotic core and calcium, similar plaque burden, and smaller lumens. TCFA may also be a stronger marker of plaque vulnerability in women than men.

SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements.

BACKGROUND: In the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial, the SYNTAX score was useful in risk stratifying patients with complex coronary artery disease. The reproducibility of this score may affect its clinical utility. We therefore assessed SYNTAX score interobserver and intraobserver variability among a group of interventional cardiologists (ICs) and an experienced group of angiographic core laboratory (ACL) technicians. METHODS AND RESULTS: After basic training from the SYNTAX score website, 3 ICs and 4 ACL technicians, each working independently, assessed the SYNTAX score of 30 multivessel disease angiograms. The ICs then underwent an intensive training session with ACL technicians, after which the SYNTAX score from 50 additional angiograms were assessed independently by both groups. Interobserver Fleiss κ statistic values were determined. A third assessment was performed using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The ACL technician interobserver strength of agreement from both periods was substantial or greater (k=0.82; 95% CI [0.72, 1.00] and 0.84 [0.76, 1.00]) and not different than QCA. The IC interobserver agreement was initially estimated to be at least slight (k=0.33 [0.18, 0.44]), improving to substantial or greater after advanced training (k=0.76 [0.64, 1.00]). Despite advanced training, ICs underscored the number of lesions, bifurcations, and small-vessel disease (P<0.001), resulting in a lower score than ACL technicians (mean difference=7.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Highly reproducible SYNTAX score measurements were quickly achieved by experienced ACL technicians. In contrast, agreement among ICs after the basic tutorial was initially poor but improved considerably after further training with the ACL, although differences still remained in interpretation of several lesion types. These findings have important implications for adoption of SYNTAX score methodology in routine practice and future clinical trials.

Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the predictive value of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (SS) for risk assessment of 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: In the SYNTAX trial, the SS was effective in risk-stratifying patients with left main and triple-vessel coronary disease, the majority of whom had stable ischemic heart disease. METHODS: The SS was determined in 2,627 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI in the angiographic substudy of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial. Patients were stratified according to tertiles of the SS: <7 (n = 854), ≥ 7 and <13 (n = 825), and ≥ 13 (n = 948). RESULTS: Among patients in the first, second, and third SS tertiles, the 1-year rates of mortality were 1.5%, 1.6%, and 4.0%, respectively (p = 0.0005); the cardiac mortality rates were 0.2%, 0.9%, and 2.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001); the myocardial infarction (MI) rates were 6.3%, 8.3%, and 12.9%, respectively (p < 0.0001); and the target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates were 7.4%, 7.0%, and 9.8%, respectively (p = 0.02). By multivariable analysis, the SS was an independent predictor of 1-year death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.07; p = 0.005), cardiac death (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.09; p = 0.0002), MI (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05; p < 0.0001), and TVR (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05; p < 0.0001). The SS affected death, cardiac death, and MI both within the first 30 days after PCI and between 30 days and 1 year, whereas it affected TVR primarily within the first 30 days. The predictive value of an increased SS was consistent among multiple pre-specified subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, the SS is an independent predictor of the 1-year rates of death, cardiac death, MI, and TVR. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).