Increasing productivity in dental practice: the role of ancillary personnel.

Dentistry has achieved substantial improvements in productivity which have the effect of making more care available at reasonable cost. Data are presented documenting trends in productivity. These are analyzed with respect to number of dentists, hours worked by dentists, and the use of ancillary personal in dental offices. There is strong evidence linking increased productivity to the use of ancillary personnel. The history of creation, recognition, and integration of ancillary personnel into dental practice is also presented.

Evolving trends in size and structure of group dental practices in the United States.

In this study, the authors examined recent trends in the growth of dental establishments and dental firms, including geographic location. In this article, they also present information about the demographic characteristics of dentists who work in a dental practice that is part of a larger company that delivers dental care in multiple locations. The number of dental establishments (single locations) and the average size of these establishments grew from 1992 to 2007. Large multi-unit dental firms grew in terms of number of establishments and the percentage of total receipts. Large multi-unit dental firms represent a small but growing segment of the dental market. Dentists less than thirty-five years old were most likely to work in a practice that was part of a larger company, and females were more likely than males to work in such a setting. The percentage of dentists working in these settings was also found to vary by region and state. The authors present a typology of dental group practice and suggest that future research should take into account the differences so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn and generalizations across categories are not made.

Economic impact of dental hygienists on solo dental practices.

The fact that a significant percentage of dentists employ dental hygienists raises an important question: Are dental practices that utilize a dental hygienist structurally and operationally different from practices that do not? This article explores differences among dental practices that operate with and without dental hygienists. Using data from the American Dental Association's 2003 Survey of Dental Practice, a random sample survey of U.S. dentists, descriptive statistics were used to compare selected characteristics of solo general practitioners with and without dental hygienists. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of dental hygienists on the gross billings and net incomes of solo general practitioners. Differences in practice characteristics--such as hours spent in the practice and hours spent treating patients, wait time for a recall visit, number of operatories, square feet of office space, net income, and gross billings--were found between solo general practitioners who had dental hygienists and those who did not. Solo general practitioners with dental hygienists had higher gross billings. Higher gross billings would be expected, as would higher expenses. However, net incomes of those with dental hygienists were also higher. In contrast, the mean waiting time for a recall visit was higher among dentists who employed dental hygienists. Depending on personal preferences, availability of qualified personnel, etc., dentists who do not employ dental hygienists but have been contemplating that path may want to further research the benefits and opportunities that may be realized.

Expanded function allied dental personnel and dental practice productivity and efficiency.

This study examined the impact of expanded function allied dental personnel on the productivity and efficiency of general dental practices. Detailed practice financial and clinical data were obtained from a convenience sample of 154 general dental practices in Colorado. In this state, expanded function dental assistants can provide a wide range of reversible dental services/procedures, and dental hygienists can give local anesthesia. The survey identified practices that currently use expanded function allied dental personnel and the specific services/procedures delegated. Practice productivity was measured using patient visits, gross billings, and net income. Practice efficiency was assessed using a multivariate linear program, Data Envelopment Analysis. Sixty-four percent of the practices were found to use expanded function allied dental personnel, and on average they delegated 31.4 percent of delegatable services/procedures. Practices that used expanded function allied dental personnel treated more patients and had higher gross billings and net incomes than those practices that did not; the more services they delegated, the higher was the practice's productivity and efficiency. The effective use of expanded function allied dental personnel has the potential to substantially expand the capacity of general dental practices to treat more patients and to generate higher incomes for dental practices.

Dental therapists in general dental practices: an economic evaluation.

Dental access disparities are well documented and have been recognized as a national problem. Their major cause is the lack of reasonable Medicaid reimbursement rates for the underserved. Specifically, Medicaid reimbursement rates for children average 40 percent below market rates. In addition, most state Medicaid programs do not cover adults. To address these issues, advocates of better oral health for the underserved are considering support for a new allied provider--a dental therapist--capable of providing services at a lower cost per service and in low-income and rural areas. Using a standard economic analysis, this study estimated the potential cost, price, utilization, and dentist's income effects of dental therapists employed in general dental practices. The analysis is based on national general dental practice data and the broadest scope of responsibility for dental therapists that their advocates have advanced, including the ability to provide restorations and extractions to adults and children, training for three years, and minimum supervision. Assuming dental therapists provide restorative, extraction, and pulpal services to patients of all ages and dental hygienists continue to deliver all hygiene services, the mean reduction in a general practice costs ranges between 1.57 and 2.36 percent. For dental therapists treating children only, the range is 0.31 to 0.47 percent. The effects on price and utilization are even smaller. In addition, the effects on most dentists' gross income, hours of work, and net income are negative. The estimated economic impact of dental therapists in the United States on private dental practice is very limited; therefore, the demand for dental therapists by private practices also would probably be very limited.

An analysis of dentists' incomes, 1996-2009.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. economy is beginning to recover from the most significant contraction since the Great Depression. Several sectors, including dentistry, have experienced reduced consumer demand and reduced earnings. Focusing on general practitioners, the authors analyzed trends in various factors that drive dentists' income to identify which of these factors are most important in explaining the recent decline. They then offer their views on future trends in dentists' net income levels. METHODS: The authors used data from a nationally representative survey of dentists maintained by the American Dental Association (ADA) and data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to analyze trends in real gross billings per visit, rates of collection of gross billings, number of visits to a dentist, percentage of the population who visited a dentist, population to dentist ratio and average real practice expenses. RESULTS: The authors found that the recent decrease in dentists' net income levels was driven primarily by a decrease in utilization of dental care on the part of the population. Moreover, this decline in dental care use, although most pronounced during the economic downturn, appeared to have started before the downturn began. This suggests that more factors than solely the economic recession are affecting changes in dental care utilization patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings suggest that average real net income for dentists may not necessarily recover to prerecession levels once economic conditions in the United States improve. This finding, combined with the potential implications of health care reform for dentistry, causes the authors to believe the future prospects related to dentists' net income levels remain uncertain.

Trends in caries among adults 18 to 45 years old.

BACKGROUND: This article focuses on changes in the caries status of adults 18 to 45 years old in the United States during the periods of 1971-1974 (the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, or NHANES I) and 1988-1994 (the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, or NHANES III). METHODS: Using data from NHANES I and NHANES III, the authors based this study on analyses of data regarding the trends in total caries, untreated caries and filled caries among adults 18 to 45 years old. RESULTS: There was a decrease of 27.26 percent in the total number of carious surfaces among adults aged 18 to 45 years, or a decline from 38.30 surfaces in NHANES I to 27.86 surfaces in NHANES III. The number of untreated caries also declined from 3.64 to 1.82, a decrease of 50.0 percent. CONCLUSIONS: These caries improvements may be associated with birth cohort effects. Young adults 18 to 25 years old in NHANES I grew up before widespread fluoridation, while people the same age in NHANES III grew up when fluoridation and preventive dentistry were more widely available. Practice Implications. The reduction in caries previously demonstrated in children has extended to adults. The impact is a decline in the need for restorative dentistry.