Differences in liver and mortality outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by race and ethnicity: A longitudinal real-world study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Understanding of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) continues to expand, but the relationship between race and ethnicity and NAFLD outside the use of cross-sectional data is lacking. Using longitudinal data, we investigated the role of race and ethnicity in adverse outcomes in NAFLD patients. METHODS: Patients with NAFLD confirmed by imaging via manual chart review from any clinics at Stanford University Medical Center (1995-2021) were included. Primary study outcomes were incidence of liver events and mortality (overall and non-liver related). RESULTS: The study included 9,340 NAFLD patients: White (44.1%), Black (2.29%), Hispanic (27.9%), and Asian (25.7%) patients. For liver events, the cumulative 5-year incidence was highest among White (19.1%) patients, lowest among Black (7.9%) patients, and similar among Asian and Hispanic patients (~15%). The 5-year and 10-year cumulative overall mortality was highest for Black patients (9.2% and 15.0%, respectively, vs. 2.5-3.5% and 4.3-7.3% in other groups) as well as for non-liver mortality. On multivariable regression analysis, compared to White patients, only Asian group was associated with lower liver-related outcomes (aHR: 0.83, P=0.027), while Black patients were at more than two times higher risk of both non-liver related (aHR: 2.35, P=0.010) and overall mortality (aHR: 2.13, P=0.022) as well as Hispanic patients (overall mortality: aHR: 1.44, P=0.022). CONCLUSION: Compared to White patients, Black patients with NAFLD were at the highest risk for overall and non-liver-related mortality, followed by Hispanic patients with Asian patients at the lowest risk for all adverse outcomes. Culturally sensitive and appropriate programs may be needed for more successful interventions.

Differential Mortality Outcomes in Real-world Patients with Lean, Nonobese, and Obese Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Background and Aims: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is commonly associated with obesity but can develop in normal-weight people (lean NAFLD). We compared outcomes in lean, overweight, and obese NAFLD. Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients at Stanford University Medical Center with NAFLD confirmed by imaging between March 1995 and December 2021. Lean, overweight, and obese patients had body mass index of <25.0, >25.0 and <29.9, and ≥30.0 kg/m2 for non-Asian and >23.0 and ≥27.5 for overweight and obese Asian patients. Results: A total of 9061 lean (10.2%), overweight (31.7%), and obese (58.1%) patients were included. Lean patients were 5 years older than obese patients (53±17.4 vs. 48.7±15.1 years), more were female (59.6% vs. 55.2%), white (49.1% vs. 46.5%), had NASH (29.2% vs. 22.5%), cirrhosis (25.3% vs.19.2%), or nonliver cancer (25.3% vs. 18.3%). Fewer had diabetes (21.7% vs. 35.8%) or metabolic comorbidities (all p<0.0001). Lean NAFLD patients had liver-related mortality similar to other groups but higher overall (p=0.01) and nonliver-related (p=0.02) mortality. After multivariable model adjustment for covariates, differences between lean and obese NAFLD in liver-related, nonliver-related, and overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratios of 1.34, 1.00, and 1.32; p=0.66, 0.99, and 0.20, respectively) were not significant. Conclusions: Lean NAFLD had fewer metabolic comorbidities but similar adverse or worse outcomes, suggesting that it is not benign. Healthcare providers should provide the same level of care and intervention as for overweight and obese NAFLD.

Poor adherence to hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a complex issue.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is associated with improved outcomes and long-term survival. Our goal is to evaluate adherence rates to HCC surveillance. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases and abstract search of relevant studies from recent major liver meetings. All searches and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Analysis was via random-effects models and multivariate meta-regression. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies (n = 19 511) met inclusion criteria (original non-interventional studies with defined cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or chronic hepatitis C with advanced fibrosis populations, and surveillance tests and intervals). Overall adherence rate was 52% (95% CI 38%-66%). Adherence was significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to chronic hepatitis B and other high-risk patients, in European compared to North American studies, in less than 12-month compared to yearly surveillance intervals, and in prospective compared to retrospective studies (71%, 95% CI 64%-78% vs 39%, 95% CI 26%-51%, P < .001). The between-study heterogeneity of all above analyses was significant (P < .001). Only the study design (retrospective vs prospective cohort) had statistical significance in a multivariate meta-regression model (P < .05) and could account for some of the differences above. CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence rate to HCC surveillance was suboptimal at 52% with no significant differences by liver disease aetiology or study location in multivariate meta-regression analysis. Further research and educational efforts are needed to improve the current rate of HCC surveillance.