Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 131(1): 193-198, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809982

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assay EEG signal quality recorded with tripolar concentric ring electrodes (TCREs) compared to regular EEG electrodes. METHODS: EEG segments were recorded simultaneously by TCREs and regular electrodes, low-pass filtered at 35 Hz (REG35) and 70 Hz (REG70). Clips were rated blindly by nine electroencephalographers for presence or absence of key EEG features, relative to the "gold-standard" of the clinical report. RESULTS: TCRE showed less EMG artifact (F = 15.4, p < 0.0001). Overall quality rankings were not significantly different. Focal slowing was better detected by TCRE and spikes were better detected by regular electrodes. Seizures (n = 85) were detected by TCRE in 64 cases (75.3%), by REG70 in 75 (88.2%) and REG35 in 69 (81.2%) electrodes. TCRE detected 9 (10.6%) seizures not detected by one of the other 2 methods. In contrast, 14 seizures (16.5%) were not detected by TCRE, but were by REG35 electrodes. Each electrode detected interictal spikes when the other did not. CONCLUSIONS: TCRE produced similar overall quality and confidence ratings versus regular electrodes, but less muscle artifact. TCRE recordings detected seizures in 7% of instances where regular electrodes did not. SIGNIFICANCE: The combination of the two types increased detection of epileptiform events compared to either alone.


Assuntos
Artefatos , Eletrodos , Eletroencefalografia/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Convulsões/fisiopatologia , Calibragem , Eletroencefalografia/normas , Humanos , Músculos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...