Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts.

OBJECTIVES: Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) root canal posts have been introduced to be used instead of metal alloys and ceramics. The aim of this study was to investigate the flexural properties of different types of FRC posts and compare those values with a novel FRC material for dental applications. METHODS: Seventeen different FRC posts of various brands (Snowpost, Carbopost, Parapost, C-post, Glassix, Carbonite) and diameters, (1.0-2.1 mm) and a continuous unidirectional E-glass FRC polymerized by light activation to a cylindrical form (everStick, diameter 1.5 mm) as a control material were tested. The posts (n=5) were stored at room's humidity or thermocycled (12.000 x, 5 degrees C/55 degrees C) and stored in water for 2 weeks before testing. A three-point bending test (span=10 mm) was used to measure the flexural strength and modulus of FRC post specimens. RESULTS: Analysis of ANOVA revealed that thermocycling, brand of material and diameter of specimen had a significant effect (p<0.001) on the fracture load and flexural strength. The highest flexural strength was obtained with the control material (everStick, 1144.9+/-99.9 MPa). There was a linear relationship between fracture load and diameter of posts for both glass fiber and carbon fiber posts. Thermocycling decreased the flexural modulus of the tested specimens by approximately 10%. Strength and fracture load decreased approximately 18% as a result of thermocycling. SIGNIFICANCE: Considerable variation can be found in the calculated strength values of the studied post brands. Commercial prefabricated FRC posts showed lower flexural properties than an individually polymerised FRC material.

Bonding of composite resin luting cement to fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare bonding of composite resin luting cement to a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) root canal post with either a cross-linked or a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) polymer matrix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different types of prefabricated FRC posts with a cross-linked polymer matrix and two types of FRC posts with a semi-IPN polymer matrix which were individually formed were tested. Serrated titanium posts served as the reference. An auto-polymerizing resin luting cement was used for cementing the posts into the holes of composite resin disks. The pull-out force was measured using a universal testing machine after the post/cement/disk system had been stored dry or thermocycled (5 degrees C/55 degrees C, 6000x) in water. The bonding sites of the posts were examined with SEM. RESULTS: The FRC posts with a semi-IPN polymer matrix gave significantly higher pull-out force values than the prefabricated FRC posts with a smooth surface and a cross-linked polymer matrix (p < 0.004). The highest pull-out force was obtained with serrated titanium posts. Both the type of FRC post and thermocycling had a significant effect on the pull-out force (n = 8, ANOVA p < 0.001 and p < 0.007, respectively). SEM photomicrographs confirmed the results. CONCLUSION: This study showed that FRC posts with a semi-IPN polymer matrix bonded better to composite resin luting cement than did prefabricated FRC posts with a cross-linked polymer matrix, although their pull-out force was not as high as that of the mechanically interlocked serrated titanium posts.

Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal.

PURPOSE: The possibility of polymerizing glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) material into the root canal was preliminarily evaluated by determining the depth of light-initiated polymerization of FRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material used was polymer-preimpregnated E-glass fiber reinforcement, which was further impregnated with light-polymerizable dimethacrylate monomer resin. The same resin without fiber reinforcement was used as a control. Six different lengths (range 4 to 24 mm) of light-protected cylinders filled with the test materials were light polymerized from one end. The degree of monomer conversion was determined from the other end by FT-IR spectrometry. Infrared spectra were recorded at six time points from the beginning of polymerization. The microhardness of the test materials was measured from the light-exposure surface toward the other end of the cylinder. RESULTS: Both groups showed a reduction in the degree of conversion with increased lengths of the cylinder. The FRC group showed a higher degree of conversion in the longest sample group compared to the resin group. Microhardness measurement confirmed the constant reduction of the degree of conversion by the reduced Vickers hardness values with increased cylinder length of the FRC. CONCLUSION: Generally, the glass FRC showed an almost equal degree of conversion after light curing as monomer resin without fibers. However, in the longest cylinders, FRC showed a slightly higher degree of conversion compared to resin only; this might be due to the fibers' ability to conduct light.