Gender-based differential management of acute low back pain in the emergency department: A survey based on a clinical vignette.

BACKGROUND: Women may receive suboptimal pain management compared with men, and this disparity might be related to gender stereotypes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of patient gender on the management of acute low back pain. DESIGN: We assessed pain management by 231 physicians using an online clinical vignette describing a consultation for acute low back pain in a female or male patient. The vignette was followed by a questionnaire that assessed physicians' management decisions and their gender stereotypes. METHODS: We created an online clinical vignette presenting a patient with acute low back pain and assessed the influence of a patient's gender on pain management. We investigated gender-related stereotyping regarding pain care by emergency physicians using the Gender Role Expectation of Pain questionnaire. RESULTS: Both male and female physicians tended to consider that a typical man was more sensitive to pain, had less pain endurance, and was more willing to report pain than a typical woman. These stereotypes did not translate into significant differences in pain management between men and women. However, women tended to be referred less often for imaging examinations than men and were also prescribed lower doses of ibuprofen and opioids. The physician's gender had a modest influence on management decisions, female physicians being more likely to prescribe ancillary examinations. CONCLUSION: We observed gender stereotypes among physicians. Our findings support the hypothesis that social characteristics attributed to men and women influence pain management. Prospective clinical studies are needed to provide a deeper understanding of gender stereotypes and their impact on clinical management.

The influence of patient gender on medical students' care: Evaluation during an objective structured clinical examination.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether men and women are evaluated and treated differently by medical students. METHODS: We evaluated patient care provided by 110 fifth-year medical students during an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), using two clinical cases with standardized patients (SPs): generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and ascending aortic dissection (AAD). Half of the students encountered male and half female SPs. Except for gender, the cases were identical. We compared diagnosis and treatment of male vs female SPs. RESULTS: Students diagnosed GAD more often in female SPs than in male SPs (diagnosis completed, partially completed, and not completed in 47%, 16% and 36% respectively vs. 22%, 20%, and 58% for male SPs, p = 0.02). The nature of symptoms was better described for male SPs. For AAD, the emergency was more frequently identified and the examination of femoral pulses better performed in female SPs. CONCLUSION: Medical students have a gender bias when evaluating patients with GAD and AAD. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: The observed gender bias in the evaluation of patients, likely leads to differences in treatment between male and female patients (i.e. under-recognition of anxiety in men). Medical schools should implement gender-sensitive medical education initiatives to improve inclusive patient care.

[Gender in medicine: what contribution to medical practice? Eight selected narratives]. / Le genre en médecine : quels apports pour la pratique ? Huit témoignages choisis.

In this article, we report abstracts of eight interviews, showing how clinicians use their interest in gender in their everyday practice. Clinicians report that being acquainted with a person interested by the question of gender raises their own awareness about the subject. In practice, they notice biased acquisition of knowledge due to non-inclusion of gender in research on one hand, and influence of gender stereotypes on clinical care on the other hand. Gender also influenced carriers. Some interviewed clinicians expressed they wished for more training, to reduce inequalities attributable to gender.

Dans cet article, nous rapportons de brefs extraits de 8 entrevues avec des clinicien·ne·s sensibilisé·e·s au genre, dans le but d'illustrer comment un intérêt pour ce domaine peut influencer la pratique quotidienne. Les personnes interrogées expliquent que le fait d'avoir un·e proche intéressé·e au genre les a rendues attentives à ce sujet. Dans leur pratique, elles disent avoir conscience de biais liés, d'une part, à l'acquisition des connaissances médicales ne tenant pas compte du genre et, d'autre part, à des stéréotypes de genre menant à une pratique médicale inégalitaire. Le genre a aussi un effet sur leurs carrières. Certaines personnes interrogées souhaiteraient bénéficier de plus de formation afin de diminuer les inégalités dues au genre.

Smoking cessation and the incidence of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study.

AIMS: Smoking cessation has been suggested to increase the short-term risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed at assessing the association between smoking cessation and incidence of T2DM and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). METHODS: Data from participants in the CoLaus study, Switzerland, aged 35-75 at baseline and followed for 5.5years were used. Participants were classified as smokers, recent (≤5years), long-term (>5years) quitters, and non-smokers at baseline. Outcomes were IFG (fasting serum glucose (FSG) 5.6-6.99mmol/l) and T2DM (FSG ≥7.0mmol/l and/or treatment) at follow up. RESULTS: 3,166 participants (63% women) had normal baseline FSG, of whom 26.7% were smokers, 6.5% recent quitters, and 23.5% long-term quitters. During follow-up 1,311 participants (41.4%) developed IFG (33.6% women, 54.7% men) and 47 (1.5%) developed T2DM (1.1% women, 2.1% men). Former smokers did not have statistically significant increased odds of IFG compared with smokers after adjustment for age, education, physical activity, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and alcohol intake, with OR of 1.29 [95% confidence interval 0.94-1.76] for recent quitters and 1.03 [0.84-1.27] for long-term quitters. Former smokers did not have significant increased odds of T2DM compared with smokers with multivariable-adjusted OR of 1.53 [0.58-4.00] for recent quitters and 0.64 [0.27-1.48] for long-term quitters. Adjustment for body-mass index and waist circumference attenuated the association between recent quitting and IFG (OR 1.07 [0.78-1.48]) and T2DM (OR 1.28 [0.48-3.40]. CONCLUSION: In this middle-aged population, smoking cessation was not associated with an increased risk of IFG or T2DM.

WITHDRAWN: Smoking cessation and the incidence of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: A cohort study.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.