Factors associated with combined hand and foot eczema.

BACKGROUND: As for hand eczema, the aetiology of foot eczema is multifactorial and not very well understood. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with foot eczema in a cohort of hand eczema patients being classified into different subgroups. METHODS: Associations between foot and hand eczema were studied in a cross-sectional design in a cohort of hand eczema patients. Consecutive patients were recruited from nine different European Centres during the period October 2011-September 2012. Data on demographic factors, presence of foot eczema, hand eczema duration and severity, and whether the hand eczema was work-related or not were available, as well as patch-test results. RESULTS: Of a total of 427 hand eczema patients identified, information on foot eczema was available in 419 patients who were included in the present study. A total of 125 patients (29.8%) had concomitant foot and hand eczema. It was found more often in association with hyperkeratotic hand eczema (P = 0.007) and was less often associated with irritant hand eczema (P < 0.001). However, foot eczema was nevertheless found in 18% of patient with irritant hand eczema and in 25% of patients with occupational hand eczema. Combined foot and hand eczema was associated with more severe and long-standing hand eczema (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Contact allergy was found in 51.8% with no difference between patients with combined foot and hand eczema and patients with hand eczema only. CONCLUSION: Occurrence of combined foot and hand eczema is a common finding and not restricted to endogenous hand eczema.

[Severe edematous dermatomyositis]. / Dermatomyosite œdémateuse sévère.

INTRODUCTION: Edematous dermatomyositis is a rare entity with localized or generalized subcutaneous edema and only 21 cases have been reported in the literature. It is considered to be a severe form of dermatomyositis which needs quick therapeutic decision. We report 2 cases with difficult therapeutic decisions. OBSERVATIONS: Two patients aged 23 and 80 years were admitted in hospital for DM with typical cutaneous and muscular involvement without any sign of gravity and which have been treated by steroids: methylprednisolone bolus and prednisone. They both then developed severe edema of the upper limbs as well as worsening of the cutaneous and muscular symptoms with dysphagia. The addition of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous immunoglobulin has permitted in the case of the first patient the disappearance of the cutaneous symptoms in particular the edema with restitution of the muscular force and withdrawal of the dysphagia and swallowing symptoms. The therapeutic failure for the second patient was due to a refusal of the treatment and a probable paraneoplastic context. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous edema localized or generalized must not be confused with periorbital erythematous edema, classically observed in DM, nor with DM with mucinosis. Potential marker of gravity, it is often associated to important muscular weakness and dysphagia. In this case, an aggressive treatment associating corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin is necessary.

Classification of hand eczema.

BACKGROUND: Classification of hand eczema (HE) is mandatory in epidemiological and clinical studies, and also important in clinical work. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to test a recently proposed classification system of HE in clinical practice in a prospective multicentre study. METHODS: Patients were recruited from nine different tertiary referral centres. All patients underwent examination by specialists in dermatology and were checked using relevant allergy testing. Patients were classified into one of the six diagnostic subgroups of HE: allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, atopic HE, protein contact dermatitis/contact urticaria, hyperkeratotic endogenous eczema and vesicular endogenous eczema, respectively. An additional diagnosis was given if symptoms indicated that factors additional to the main diagnosis were of importance for the disease. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were included, 379 (89%) of the patients could be classified directly into one of the six diagnostic subgroups, with irritant and allergic contact dermatitis comprising 249 patients (58%). For 32 (7%) more than one of the six diagnostic subgroups had been formulated as a main diagnosis, and 16 (4%) could not be classified. 38% had one additional diagnosis and 26% had two or more additional diagnoses. Eczema on feet was found in 30% of the patients, statistically significantly more frequently associated with hyperkeratotic and vesicular endogenous eczema. CONCLUSION: We find that the classification system investigated in the present study was useful, being able to give an appropriate main diagnosis for 89% of HE patients, and for another 7% when using two main diagnoses. The fact that more than half of the patients had one or more additional diagnoses illustrates that HE is a multifactorial disease.

[Hand eczema and occupational disorders]. / Eczéma des mains et maladie professionnelle.

Hand eczema (HE) is a frequent skin disease, combining endogenous and exogenous factors. Occupational -or work-related- hand eczema (OHE) is frequently a chronic and relapsing disease, due to irritant and allergenic contacts. Burden of disease is important, since OHE strikes quality of life of the patient, has significant social and economic impact, and may jeopardize his professional future. The management of OHE combines etiological assessment, efficient symptomatic treatment and adaptation of working conditions.

[Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity]. / Interprétation et pertinence des patch-tests : faux-positifs et faux-négatifs, allergies composées, allergies croisées.

This chapter reviews pitfalls and mistakes in patch testing. Most sources of false-positive and false-negative reactions are indicated and analysed. Cross-sensitivity among allergens is discussed and compound allergy is debated. Keys for establishing relevance are indicated, for a better reading and interpretation of patch testing by practitioners (trainees or experienced dermatologists).

Hand eczema classification: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of the aetiology and morphology of hand eczema.

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a long-lasting disease with a high prevalence in the background population. The disease has severe, negative effects on quality of life and sometimes on social status. Epidemiological studies have identified risk factors for onset and prognosis, but treatment of the disease is rarely evidence based, and a classification system for different subdiagnoses of hand eczema is not agreed upon. Randomized controlled trials investigating the treatment of hand eczema are called for. For this, as well as for clinical purposes, a generally accepted classification system for hand eczema is needed. OBJECTIVES: The present study attempts to characterize subdiagnoses of hand eczema with respect to basic demographics, medical history and morphology. METHODS: Clinical data from 416 patients with hand eczema from 10 European patch test clinics were assessed. RESULTS: A classification system for hand eczema is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that this classification be used in clinical work and in clinical trials.

[Contact allergy to antiseptics: 75 cases analyzed by the dermato-allergovigilance network (Revidal)]. / Allergie de contact aux antiseptiques: 75 cas analysés par le réseau Revidal de dermato-allergovigilance.

AIM: To determine the clinical features of contact dermatitis caused by antiseptics and to ascertain whether the substance responsible is the antiseptic itself or the excipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study based on analysis of all cases reported over a 2-year period to the Dermato-Allergology Vigilance network known as Revidal. Each dossier contained details of the clinical characteristics of lesions, the incriminated antiseptic, the mode of exposure and the results of patch tests done with the antiseptic in question. RESULTS: 75 patients (mean age: 44 years) were sensitized to chlorhexidine (14 cases), hexamidine (20 cases), povidone iodine (14 cases), mercuric antiseptics (3 cases), triclocarban (Septivon, 17 cases), hexamidine-chlorhexidine-chlorocresol (Cytéal, 4 cases), or chlorhexidine surfactant (Hibiscrub), cetrimide or chlorhexidine digluconate (Diaseptyl) (1 case each). Exposure was therapy-related (68 cases), work-related (6 cases; 5 in health workers and 1 in a cattle farmer due to povidone-iodine) or related to cosmetics (1 case, hexamidine). The clinical features consisted mainly of localized contact dermatitis, although generalized eczema occurred in 9 cases due to hexamidine contact. Sensitization was due to the antiseptic itself (53 cases) or to the excipients alone (22 cases), particularly in the 17 cases caused by Septivon. In 27/75 cases (35%), patients exhibited polysensitization to antiseptics belonging to different chemical classes or to other topical drugs. CONCLUSION: Sensitization to antiseptics is probably not rare, with various sources of exposure being present in everyday life. Patch tests are essential for diagnosis in order to distinguish between antiseptic-related and excipient-related sensitization and to screen for polysensitization to topical drugs.

Routine patch testing with frullanolide mix: an European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group multicentre study.

Contact sensitivity to plants containing 1 or more sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) is difficult to diagnose. The mixture of SLs (SL mix) has been shown to detect only about 60% of sensitized individuals. In order to improve the diagnosis of sensitization to plants containing SLs, we have tested a mixture of frullanolides contained in Frullania dilatata and Frullania tamarisci at 3 different concentrations (0.01%, 0.033% and 0.1% in petrolatum). 8605 consecutive eczema patients in 1 North American and 15 European dermatology departments were tested with this mix, and 0.35% of positive cases to the different concentrations were found. Routine use of this mix permitted detection of only a small percentage of extra cases and did not improve the SL mix score. The frullanolide mix should therefore be restricted to investigations in particular geographical zones and/or in particular occupations.

[Allergic vasculitis following ingestion of celecoxib?]. / Allergische Vaskulitis nach Einnahme von Celecoxib?

A 76-year-old patient developed cutaneous vasculitis on the lower legs on the 8th day of treatment with the selective cox-2-inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex((R))) and the proton-pump inhibitor omeprazole. The patient had no history of allergic reactions. The patient had already been treated previously with omeprazole without any side effects. A cutaneous biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of leucocytoclastic vasculitis. The purpuric skin lesions regressed within 3 weeks after withdrawing the two newly introduced drugs. We discuss the potential role of Celecoxib in triggering this vasculitis.