Safety of Pyrazinamide for the Treatment of Tuberculosis in Older Patients Over 75 Years of Age: A Retrospective Monocentric Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pyrazinamide (PZA) has a controversial safety profile in older patients. We aimed to assess the frequency and risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients over 75 years of age treated for tuberculosis with or without PZA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including patients aged over 75 years treated for active tuberculosis between 2008 and 2018. The frequency, type, seriousness, and causality assessment of ADRs to anti-tuberculosis treatment were compared between patients receiving PZA or not. Risk factors for ADRs were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 110 patients included, 54 (49.1%) received PZA (group 1) and 56 (50.9%) did not (group 2). ADRs to anti-tuberculosis drugs occurred in 31 patients (57.4%) in groups 1 and 15 (26.8%) in group 2 (p = 0.003). PZA-related ADRs occurred in 40.7% of exposed patients. Frequency of renal ADRs was higher in group 1 (9.3% vs 0%; p = 0.026). Rates of hepatic (18.5% vs 12.5%; p = 0.38), digestive (22.2% vs 8.9%; p = 0.054), and allergic (14.8% vs 5.4%; p = 0.12) ADRs were numerically higher in group 1 although the differences were not statistically significant. Serious ADRs occurred more frequently in group 1 (24.1% vs 8.9%; p = 0.03). The use of PZA was the only independent risk factor for ADRs to anti-tuberculosis drugs (odds ratio 3.75, 95% CI 1.5-9.6; p = 0.0056). No risk factors for PZA-related ADRs were identified. CONCLUSION: In older French patients, the use of PZA was associated with more frequent ADRs to anti-tuberculosis drugs.

[Tuberculosis: relevance of isoniazid dosage in prevention of liver side effects]. / Tuberculose: intérêt du dosage de l'isoniazide dans la prévention des effets hépatotoxiques.

OBJECTIVE: Several recent studies have established a correlation between NAT2 polymorphism and hepatotoxicity induced by isoniazid. The objective of this work was to assess the place of isoniazid dosage, marker of acetylation phenotype, in clinical practice in the department of Haute-Garonne. METHODS: Data from reportable disease of tuberculosis and the results of isoniazid dosage performed at the pharmacokinetics and clinical toxicology laboratory were used during the period 2009-2012. RESULTS: The current practice of dosage is far from being systematical: only 3.9% of patients who developed tuberculosis have benefited from isoniazid dosage. The isoniazid initial posology was adapted to the acetylation capacity for only 33.3% of patients. CONCLUSION: A decision tree was realized and used to identify populations (low metabolism) liable to benefit from isoniazid dosage.