Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Migr Health ; 6: 100114, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677661

RESUMO

Access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable contraceptive methods of choice is a basic right for displaced people. Yet displaced people are typically invisible in national sample surveys on population health, and quantitative evidence on their reproductive health outcomes is limited. This study focuses on the case of Iraq, a country with widespread displacement and where contraceptive use is a government policy priority. Using displacement screening questions in the Iraq 2018 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey questionnaires, I construct two displacement-related indicators based on reason for last move and previous household residence. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression are used to test associations between modern contraceptive use and displacement, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Controlling for the variables in the models, factors significantly associated with modern contraceptive use among married women aged 15-49 in Iraq are Federal Iraq region (reference Kurdish Region of Iraq, OR 1.78), upper secondary and primary education (reference pre-primary or no education, OR 1.50 and 1.20, respectively), parity, age, and exposure to television. The association between displacement (reason for last move) and modern contraceptive use significantly depends on a woman's level of education and whether they live in an urban or rural area. Women who previously lived in a camp are almost half as likely to use modern contraception compared to other previous residence types. This paper highlights the methodological potential and substantive value of using national household surveys to analyse reproductive health outcomes through a displacement lens. It also critically examines the limitations of these data and measures, drawing on total survey error and feminist theory.

2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 135(3): 380-384, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836466

RESUMO

In 2012, the government of Sierra Leone cut the national budget allocation to the health sector. Civil society organizations planned a nationwide health budget advocacy campaign, coinciding with the 2012 general elections, to hold future leaders to account on financing for women's and children's health. As part of the campaign, Evidence for Action produced district health budget tracking scorecards. The scorecards presented Ministry of Finance data on the allocation and disbursement of health funds in each district. The data were communicated using simple, non-technical language so that citizens could understand the key messages and take action. A total of 5600 scorecards were shared at district electoral forums attended by political candidates, community members, and health activists. Since the election, the proportion of the total government budget allocated to health increased from 7.4% in 2012 to 11.2% in 2014. However, transforming politicians' commitments and pledges into implementation has been challenging, confirming that accountability is a long-term process.


Assuntos
Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Financiamento da Assistência à Saúde , Saúde do Lactente/economia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Política , Responsabilidade Social , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Organizações , Gravidez , Serra Leoa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...