Video capsule endoscopy impacts decision making in pediatric IBD: a single tertiary care center experience.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) on decision making in pediatric patients with IBD. Moreover, few studies have reported on the outcomes of treatment changes made based on VCE findings. Our aim was to identify the added value of VCE in pediatric patients in a tertiary IBD center with established or suspected IBD, by assessing changes in treatments and outcomes before and after VCE. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in children with established (n = 66) or suspected (n = 17) IBD who underwent VCE. Diagnostic classifications, treatments, and clinical outcomes before and 1 year after VCE were compared. RESULTS: Primary indications for VCE included patients treated for Crohn's disease (CD) with poor growth or active symptoms (60%), patients with ulcerative colitis/IBD-unclassified (19%), and suspected IBD (20%). Abnormal VCE was seen in 86% of patients with CD, of whom 75% underwent treatment escalation. One year after VCE, patients with CD improved in growth (mean z-scores at baseline and 12 months, -0.5 and 0.2, respectively; P < 0.0001), mean body mass index (18.3 and 19.8, respectively; P = 0.004), mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (25 versus 16, respectively; P = 0.012), and median Harvey-Bradshaw Index (2 and 0, respectively; P = 0.003). VCE revealed more extensive disease than concurrent imaging modalities in 43% of the patients with CD. VCE "ruled out" IBD in 94% who had suspected IBD, whereas 50% with presumed ulcerative colitis/IBD-unclassified had a diagnosis changed to CD. CONCLUSIONS: VCE provides additional clinical information that impacted management of pediatric patients with IBD in a tertiary IBD center and was associated with improved outcomes.

Markers of antigen presentation and activation on eosinophils and T cells in the esophageal tissue of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests eosinophils may be acting as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by presenting antigen to T cells. We investigated the surface proteins of eosinophils and T cells in the esophageal biopsies of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: : Subjects were categorized as EoE, GERD, or HC. In esophageal tissue, EG2+ eosinophils were stained for the APC markers, CD40 or CD80, via immunohistochemistry. CD3+ T cells were stained for costimulatory markers, CD40L or CD28, and for activation markers, CD69 or CD134, via immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Eosinophils stained with CD40 and CD80. The number of EG2+CD40+ cells was increased in EoE (mean 19.1±14.8 cells/high-power field [HPF], n=11), compared with GERD (mean 0.13±0.19 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01) and HC (mean 0.3±0.7 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01). There was an elevation in EG2+CD80+ cells in EoE (mean 18.1±16.2 cells/HPF, n=10), GERD (mean 1.7±2.8 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01), or HC (mean 0.8±1.3 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01). CD3+ T cells stained with CD40L (not quantified). CD3+ T cells stained with CD28 at elevated levels in EoE (mean 14±8.7 cells/HPF, n=9) versus GERD (mean 3.3±1.2 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.05) or HC (mean 3.0±3.2 cells/HPF, n=7, P<0.01). The number of CD3+CD69+ cells was highest in EoE (mean 14.8±7.5 cells/HPF, n=6) versus GERD (mean 0.8±0.9 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001) or HC (mean 2.7±2.5 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We show that esophageal eosinophils express CD40 and CD80, and T cells with CD40L, CD28, and CD69. The number of double-stained cells was higher in EoE in comparison to control groups. These data support the hypothesis that eosinophils in EoE may act as APCs, activating T cells.