Low ICU burnout in a safety net hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Burnout tends to be high in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) settings. Stressors include serious patient illness, round-the-clock acute events, and end of life (non-beneficial) care. We report on an ICU with very low burnout scores. We sought to understand factors that might be responsible for these favorable outcomes. DESIGN: We compared ICU scores on burnout and its predictors with scores in non ICU providers, merging scores in four ICUs (burn, medical, surgical and pediatrics). Analyses included descriptive statistics, as well as general estimating equations to assess odds of burnout in ICU vs non ICU clinicians. SETTING: Annual wellness survey performed in October 2017 at Hennepin Healthcare System (HHS), an integrated system of care that includes an urban safety net hospital in Minneapolis, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred seventy-nine providers (physicians and advanced practice providers). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Annual surveys are performed using the validated Mini-Z 10 item wellness instrument. The Mini-Z assesses stress, satisfaction, and burnout, as well as known predictors including work control, chaos, teamwork, values alignment, and electronic medical record-related stress. Response rate in ICUs was 70% (64% elsewhere). Ten percent of ICU clinicians reported burnout, vs 37% of other providers (p = 0.015). ICUs were characterized as having lower chaos, less stress, and very high teamwork and values alignment between clinicians and leaders. Odds of burnout were four times lower in ICU clinicians (Odds Ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.06, 0.96, p = 0.043). Of all HHS providers, those with values not aligned with leaders had 3.28 times the odds of burnout (CIs 1.92, 5.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low burnout can be present in a busy, safety net ICU. Explicitly aligning values between clinicians and leaders may hold promise as a remediable worklife factor for producing these favorable results.

Associations and outcomes of septic pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Septic pulmonary embolism is a serious but uncommon syndrome posing diagnostic challenges because of its broad range of clinical presentation and etiologies. OBJECTIVE: To understand the clinical and radiographic associations of septic pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to an acute care safety net hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of imaging and electronic health records of all patients diagnosed with septic pulmonary embolism in our hospital between January 2000 and January 2013. RESULTS: 41 episodes of septic pulmonary embolism were identified in 40 patients aged 17 to 71 years (median 46); 29 (72%) were men. Presenting symptoms included: febrile illness (85%); pulmonary complaints (66%) including pleuritic chest pain (22%), cough (19%) and dyspnea (15%); and those related to the peripheral foci of infection (24%) and shock (19%). Sources of infection included: skin and soft tissue (44%); infective endocarditis (27%); and infected peripheral deep venous thrombosis (17%). 35/41 (85%) were bacteremic with staphylococcus aureus. All patients had peripheral nodular lesions on chest CT scan. Treatment included intravenous antibiotics in all patients. Twenty six (63%) patients required pleural drainage and/or drainage of peripheral abscesses. Seven (17%) patients received systemic anticoagulants. Eight (20%) patients died due to various complications. CONCLUSION: The epidemiology of septic pulmonary embolism has broadened over the past decade with an increase in identified extrapulmonary, non-cardiac sources. In the context of an extrapulmonary infection, clinical features of persistent fever, bacteremia and pulmonary complaints should raise suspicion for this syndrome, and typical findings on the chest CT scans confirm the diagnosis. Antibiotics, local drainage procedures and increasingly, anticoagulation are keys to successful outcomes.

Communication of prognostic information for critically ill patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the timing of prognostic information delivery by physicians is associated with caregiver satisfaction with communication or decision making in the ICU. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Medical and surgical ICUs in a community and university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Decision makers for critically ill patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Longitudinal surveys assessed both actual and desired frequency of communication with physicians, timing and content of physician prognosis, and subject satisfaction with physician communication and subject's role in decision making. Seventy subjects were enrolled and completed 216 surveys. Fifty-seven caregivers (81%) received prognostic information during the ICU stay, with a mean time between ICU admission and provision of prognostic information (prognostic interval) of 1.7 +/- 2.8 days (median, 1 day). This interval was not associated with patient age, severity of illness, clinical service, hospital, socioeconomic status, or prior patient ICU admission. A shorter prognostic interval was associated with increased satisfaction with communication, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.06). Both the measured communication rate (p < 0.001) and subjects' desired communication rate with physicians decreased over time in the ICU (p < 0.001). Although 78% of subjects rated their overall satisfaction with frequency of communication as "good," "very good," or "excellent," their satisfaction with communication frequency decreased with time in the ICU (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Families of critically ill patients were generally satisfied with communication in the ICU; however, 19% were unable to recall receiving any prognostic information from physicians. Providing all decision makers with some prognostic information, even if it consists of a statement of uncertainty (as was commonly done in this study), may further improve satisfaction with ICU care. A widening gap between the actual and desired communication rate may result in a decline in communication satisfaction over the course of the ICU stay. This suggests that the capacity of physicians and other ICU personnel to manage families' communication expectations may positively influence caregiver satisfaction.