Performance of a Prospective Anticoagulation Stratification Algorithm After Liver Transplantation.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 0.4% to 15.5% and bleeding occurs in 20% to 35% of patients after liver transplantation (LT). Balancing the risk of bleeding from therapeutic anticoagulation and risk of thrombosis in the postoperative period is challenging. Little evidence exists regarding the best treatment strategy for these patients. We hypothesized that a subset of LT patients who develop postoperative deep vein thromboses (DVTs) could be managed without therapeutic anticoagulation. We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative using a standardized Doppler ultrasound-based VTE risk stratification algorithm to guide parsimonious implementation of therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin drip. Methods: In a prospective management QI initiative for DVT management, we compared 87 LT historical patients (control group; January 2016-December 2017) to 182 LT patients (study group; January 2018-March 2021). We analyzed the rates of immediate therapeutic anticoagulation after DVT diagnosis within 14 d of LT, clinically significant bleeding, return to the operating room, readmission, pulmonary embolism, and death within 30 d of LT before and after the QI initiative. Results: Ten patients (11.5%) in the control group and 23 patients (12.6%; P = 0.9) in the study group developed DVTs after LT. Immediate therapeutic anticoagulation was used in 7 of 10 and 5 of 23 patients in the control and study groups, respectively (P = 0.024). The study group had lower odds of receiving immediate therapeutic anticoagulation after VTE (21.7% versus 70%; odds ratio = 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.019-0.587; P = 0.013) and a lower rate of postoperative bleeding (8.7% versus 40%; odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.91; P = 0.048). All other outcomes were similar. Conclusions: Implementing a risk-stratified VTE treatment algorithm for immediate post-LT patients appears to be safe and feasible. We observed a decrease in the use of therapeutic anticoagulation and a lower rate of postoperative bleeding without adverse impacts on early outcomes.

Belatacept As an Alternative to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Patients with Solid Organ Transplants.

The goal of immunosuppression in transplantation has shifted to improving long-term outcomes, reducing drug-induced toxicities while preserving the already excellent short-term outcomes. Long-term gains in solid organ transplantation have been limited at least partly due to the nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The alloimmune response requires activation of the costimulatory pathway for T cell proliferation and amplification. Belatacept is a molecule that selectively blocks T cell costimulation. In June 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved it for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation based on two open-label, randomized, phase III trials. Since its introduction, belatacept has shown promise in both short- and long-term renal transplant outcomes in several other trials. It exhibits a superior side effect profile compared to CNIs with a comparable efficacy. Across all solid organ transplants, the burden of chronic kidney disease, its associated cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and inferior patient/allograft survival is a well-documented problem. In this review, we aim to discuss the evidence behind the use of belatacept in solid organ transplants as an effective alternative to CNIs for renal rescue in patients with acute and/or chronic kidney injury.

Post-transplant Desensitization for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience.

The highly-sensitized kidney transplant candidate with no available living donors remains at a major disadvantage with decreased access and worse outcomes post-transplant. We have previously reported our initial data on both pre-transplant and post-transplant desensitization. We observed only a modest decline in unacceptable antigens with pretransplant intravenous immunoglobin (IVIG) and rituximab. Due to these observations, we have focused on a peri-operative post-transplant desensitization protocol in our program. Beginning in 2006, we implemented a simple point-based algorithm [variables included: panel reactive antibody (PRA) status; flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM); and delayed graft function] to identify kidney transplant recipients who would undergo peri-operative plasmapheresis/IVIG to abrogate preformed antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR). Our previous results suggested acceptable 5-year outcomes. Here, in an expanded population (N=66), we report an overall death-censored graft survival of 73% at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years post-transplant. Our patients were largely African American (85%) and regrafts (39%), with a median PRA of 88%, and a mean T- and B-FCXM of 97 mean channel shifts (MCS) and 117 MCS, respectively. Although acute AMR rates were acceptable (12%), 22% of patients developed chronic AMR. A pre-transplant T-cell FCXM of > 200 MCS (p=0.02) or presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) at most recent follow-up (p=0.02) were associated with graft loss. Current studies with revised protocols utilizing additional DSA information, surveillance biopsies, and proteasome inhibition are ongoing.