Challenges to recovery following early psychosis: Nursing implications of recovery rate and timing.

Early intervention in first episode psychosis is based on an indicated prevention approach that has early illness identification and timely recovery as primary goals. Nurses are instrumental in helping individuals and families achieve both aims. To better understand recovery following a first episode, a prospective cohort of 260 individuals participating in a three-year early intervention program was monitored for achievement of recovery outcomes. Two outcome measures were used to examine the recovery rate and timing of the cohort: (1) partial recovery was comprised of two criteria: (a) symptom control (psychosis and mania), and (b) daily functioning, and 2) comprehensive recovery was measured by three criteria: (a) symptom control; (b) daily functioning; and, (c) quality of life. Survival analysis, including the Kaplan-Meier statistic, and Cox hazard regression were used to examine the cohort's rate and timing for both measures. One hundred and seventy-four individuals attained partial recovery with half (51.1%) reaching the target within nine months. Comprehensive recovery was achieved by 59 individuals (22.7%), primarily in year two and three of treatment. Issues impacting quality of life delayed recovery for the majority of program participants. The gap between psychosis remission and satisfaction/fulfillment with one's everyday life is troubling, but could be improved with stronger nursing support and influence. Sharing the recovery experience with individuals and families that supports their life goals and the discovery of meaning, hope and purpose in the face of illness is the work of nurses. Suggestions for strengthening nursing's impact are considered.

Impact of comorbid cannabis use on outcome in first episode psychosis.

AIM: Comorbid cannabis abuse is common in patients with early psychosis. Little is known about the effect of stopping cannabis use on positive, negative and depressive symptoms. Few studies have controlled for multiple substance use that may mask the specific role that cannabis plays in symptom outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether course and level of cannabis use negatively impacted early psychosis patient symptom profiles (positive, negative and depressive symptoms) over 24 months. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients admitted to an early psychosis intervention programme in a naturalistic setting were followed across three time periods: initial presentation, 12 and 24 months. Patients' clinical characteristics (substance use, positive/negative symptoms and depressive symptoms) were assessed at each time period. RESULTS: There were no significant associations found between cannabis abuse and positive and negative symptoms. Continuation and discontinuation of cannabis use were not significant for cannabis or any other substance when compared to positive and negative symptoms. There was a significant interaction between cannabis and alcohol for depressive symptoms, where depressive symptoms were significantly higher in patients who abused cannabis without co-occurring alcohol abuse when compared to non-cannabis using patients. CONCLUSION: The current study findings indicate a complex interaction between cannabis and alcohol use in a sample of early psychosis patients across 24 months. More research is needed into the association between ceasing cannabis use and long-term outcome for early psychosis patients. Of particular importance is the interaction between level of cannabis and alcohol use as it is related to symptom outcome in early psychosis patients.

Switching treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder to olanzapine: a one-year open-label study with five-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder would respond when switched to olanzapine and whether they could maintain their response on this atypical antipsychotic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center, observational, 1-year open-label study, a cohort of patients was switched to olanzapine due to failure on previous treatment. The patients were followed up (retrospectively) for an additional 5 years. Patients had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and all but one were treatment-resistant. The starting dose was 10 mg/day, with dosage adjustments based on physician judgment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The CGI-S and CGI-I scales were the primary outcome measures. During the observation period, positive and negative symptoms, hospital readmission rates and duration of hospitalization were measured, and treatment-emergent adverse events recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of patients (n = 25) was 39.7 years; 19 were male, and all were Caucasian. The mean number of antipsychotics used prior to olanzapine was 4.6 with risperidone (76%) being the most common. The mean duration of olanzapine therapy was 8.6 months. The average number of hospital admissions per patient dropped from 1.32 during the year prior to olanzapine therapy to 0.39 after starting olanzapine. Total number of hospital days was 1042 the year before and 258 the year after olanzapine treatment. The mean CGI-S score improved from markedly ill at baseline to borderline/mildly ill at study end. The mean CGI-I score was rated much improved at study end. Few adverse events occurred during the study. Twelve patients remained on olanzapine monotherapy after 5 years of treatment (mean duration of 62 months). CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine may be a treatment option for patients who fail to respond to treatment with other antipsychotics. Importantly, this is one of the first reports showing that patients with schizophrenia can be maintained on atypical antipsychotic monotherapy for at least 5 years.