Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures and Bone Pain after Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: Relation to Pelvic Bone Dose-Volume Parameters.

Purpose: Chemoradiation therapy is the primary treatment for anal cancer. Radiation therapy (RT) can weaken the pelvic bone structure, but the risk of pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) and derived pain in anal cancer is not yet established. We determined the frequency of symptomatic PIFs after RT for anal cancer and related this to radiation dose to specific pelvic bone substructures. Methods and Materials: In a prospective setting, patients treated with RT for anal cancer had magnetic resonance imaging 1 year after RT. PIFs were mapped to 17 different bone sites, and we constructed a guideline for detailed delineation of pelvic bone substructures. Patients were interviewed regarding pain and scored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects. Dose-volume relationships for specific pelvic bone substructures and PIFs were determined for V20 to V40 Gy mean and maximum doses. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included, and 51.9% had PIFs primarily located in the alae of the sacral bone. Patients with PIFs had significantly more pelvic pain (86% vs 23%, P = .001) and 43% had grade 2 bone pain. Dose-volume parameters for sacral bone and sacral alae were significantly higher in patients with PIFs (P < .05). V30 Gy (%) for sacral bone and alae implied an area under the curve of 0.764 and 0.758, respectively, in receiver operating characteristic analyses. Conclusions: We observed a high risk of PIFs in patients treated with RT for anal cancer 1 year after treatment. A significant proportion had pain in the sites where PIFs were most frequently found. Radiation dose to pelvic bone substructures revealed relation to risk of PIFs and can be used for plan optimization in future clinical trials.

One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. RESULTS: Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.

The Clinical Value of Measuring Circulating HPV DNA during Chemo-Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is investigated in various cancers. In squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) is found in around 90% of cases and here, plasma HPV (pHPV) can be used as ctDNA. Preliminary data have proved the ability to detect pHPV16 and -18 in SCCA. We have developed a highly sensitive method for measurement of six relevant pHPV subtypes, to investigate the elimination pattern of pHPV during chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for SCCA and its clinical value. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated at Aarhus University Hospital from 2016-2020 were included. P16 status in the primary biopsy was measured and 82% of patients had P16 positive tumor. Blood samples were collected prior to treatment (PT), mid treatment (MT), end of therapy (EOT), and during follow-up (FU). An in-house multiplex digital droplet PCR method measured pHPV subtypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 51, 58. RESULTS: Samples from 88 patients were drawn PT (n = 73), MT (n = 72), EOT (n = 64) and during FU (n = 41). Plasma HPV was detectable in 52 patients and PT pHPV levels correlated to tumor stages. Three elimination patterns were observed during CRT with correlation to outcome: fast responders with no local or distant failures (0/12); slow responders with high risk of local failures (4/20), no distant failures; persistent molecular responders with high risk of distant failures (4/13), but no local failures, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: During CRT, pHPV can divide patients with SCCA into three groups with significantly different risk of failure. The use of pHPV can potentially assist in clinical treatment decision.

In vivo targeting of miR-223 in experimental eosinophilic oesophagitis.

OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is characterised by oesophageal inflammation, fibrosis and dysfunction. Micro (mi)-RNAs interfere with pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic transcriptional programs, and miR-223 was upregulated in oesophageal mucosal biopsy specimens from EoE patients. The therapeutic potential of modulating miR-223 expression in vivo has not been determined. We aimed to elucidate the relevance of oesophageal miR-223 expression in an in vivo model of EoE by inhibiting miR-223 tissue expression. METHODS: The expression of miR-223 and the validated miR-223 target insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) protein was determined in our paediatric cohort of EoE patients. A murine model of Aspergillus fumigatus-induced EoE was employed, and oesophagi were assessed for miR-233, IGF1R, T lymphocyte type 2 (T2) cytokine expression and eosinophil infiltration. Mice were treated with antagomirs targeting miR-223 or resveratrol targeting its upstream regulator Midline-1(MID-1). RESULTS: There was an inverse relationship between an increased expression of miR-223 and a decreased IGF1R protein concentration in biopsy specimens from EoE patients. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand deficiency, MID-1 inhibition and resveratrol treatment suppressed miR-223 expression. Furthermore, inhibition of miR-223 and treatment with resveratrol in the oesophagus resulted in an amelioration of EoE hallmark features including eosinophilic infiltration, oesophageal circumference and a reduction in T2 cytokine expression. CONCLUSION: miR-223 has a key role in the perpetuation of EoE hallmark features downstream of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and MID-1 in an experimental model. These studies highlight a potentially critical role of miRNA function in EoE aetiology. miR-223 expression in the oesophagus may be therapeutically modulated by resveratrol, providing a potential new therapeutic option to be explored in EoE patients for this increasingly prevalent condition.

Measurement of circulating free DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and relation to risk factors and recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Measuring circulating-free-deoxyribonucleic-acid (cfDNA) has created a new framework for personalized treatment in oncology. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between cfDNA and risk factors and outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). METHODS: Patients treated with radiotherapy for localized SCCA were included in Aarhus, Denmark from 2016 to 2019. Serum samples from baseline, during and after therapy, were measured for the level of cfDNA in copies per mL by a direct fluorescent assay. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. Samples were available at baseline (n = 73) mid-therapy (n = 74), end-therapy (n = 67) and one-year follow-up (1Y) (n = 29). P16-positivity was found in 89% (n = 55). The median level of cfDNA was higher for P16 negative tumors (1.48) compared with the P16 positive tumors (0.90, P = 0.04). Data showed a correlation between baseline cfDNA levels and Gross Tumor Volume (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.01), and increasing levels with increasing T-stage (T1 = 0.80, T2 = 0.94, T3 = 1.11, T4 = 1.3). Higher cfDNA levels were observed in patients with poor performance status (P < 0.01). The cfDNA level decreased from baseline to mid-therapy (0.92-0.78, P < 0.01) and from baseline to 1Y (0.92-0.71, P < 0.01). Baseline levels for patients with treatment failure (n = 8) were above the 25th percentile (p = 0.05) which translates into difference in disease free survival. CONCLUSION: Results indicate an association between baseline cfDNA levels and risk factors in SCCA and a low baseline level correlates to lower risk of treatment failure. Findings contribute with new knowledge of the biological role of cfDNA in SCCA and holds potential knowledge for personalized treatment of SCCA.

Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and patient reported outcomes in anal cancer and plan optimization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for localized anal cancer (AC), but this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity. However, there is a lack of prospectively collected toxicity and patient reported outcome (PRO) data from larger cohorts. The purpose was to prospectively collect and determine agreement between physician assessed toxicity (CTCAE) and PRO during and after CRT and to compare IMRT, VMAT and proton-based planning in a subgroup of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients, treated with CRT for AC, were included between 2015 and 2017. NCI-CTCAE v.4.0, EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 data were collected baseline, mid-therapy, end-of therapy and 2-4 weeks posttherapy. Treatment planning with 5- or 6-fixed field IMRT, 2 and 3 arc VMAT, and 3- and 4-field proton plans were compared. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included. Both CTCAE and PROs related to acute toxicity reached a maximum at end of therapy. Incidences of PROs were markedly higher with only slight to fair agreement to CTCAE, (κ 13-37). Comparative planning revealed dosimetric equality of IMRT and VMAT plans, but superiority of proton plans. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of PRO scores and weak agreement to CTCAE suggest that PROs are important tools complementary to CTCAE in evaluating patient symptoms during and after CRT. Proton therapy has the potential to lower radiation doses to most organs at risk.

A case series study of eighty-five chronic spontaneous urticaria patients referred to a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a debilitating disease for the patients and often considered by the doctors a very difficult disease to treat. In 2009 the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/Global Allergy and Asthma European network/European Dermatology Forum/World Allergy Organization (EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO) published a revised version of the guidelines for the treatment of urticaria which included an algorithm for the treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the clinical effect and the practical use of the algorithm. METHODS: The study was performed as a case-series study of all newly referred patients to our urticaria clinic over a period of 18 months. RESULTS: Our results show that the single most important and efficient treatment of urticaria patients is up dosing non-sedating antihistamines as recommended by the EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines. We did not find any predicting factors for responders to the antihistamine treatment, but about one third of the patients did not respond to the up-dosing of the antihistamines. CONCLUSION: Antihistamines seems to be the most efficient treatment for urticaria; other treatments such as montelukast, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil may also be used, but only in combination with antihistamines and only in the case of an independent antihistamines treatment failure. The EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the treatment of urticaria offers an efficient and simple guidelines for the treatment of urticaria.