Inhibition of cyclin D1 gene transcription by Brg-1.

The evolutionarily conserved SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling complex regulates cellular proliferation. A catalytic subunit, BRG-1, is frequently down regulated, silenced or mutated in malignant cells, however, the mechanism by which BRG-1 may function as a tumor suppressor or block breast cancer cellular proliferation is not understood. The cyclin D1 gene is a collaborative oncogene overexpressed in greater than 50% of human breast cancers. Herein, BRG-1 inhibited DNA synthesis and cyclin D1 expression in human MCF-7 breast cancer epithelial cells. The cyclin D1 promoter AP-1 and CRE sites were required for repression by BRG-1 in promoter assays. BRG-1 deficient cells abolished and siRNA to BRG-1 reduced, formation of the BRG-1 chromatin complex. The endogenous cyclin D1 promoter AP-1 site bound BRG-1. Estradiol treatment of MCF-7 cells induced recruitment of BRG-1 to the endogenous hpS2 gene promoter. Estradiol, which induced cyclin D1 abundance, was associated with a reduction in recruitment of the co-repressors HP1alpha/HDAC1 to the endogenous cyclin D1 promoter AP-1/BRG-1 binding sites. These studies suggest the endogenous cyclin D1 promoter BRG-1 binding site functions as a molecular scaffold in the context of local chromatin upon which coactivators and corepressors are recruited to regulate cyclin D1.

Cyclin D1 repression of nuclear respiratory factor 1 integrates nuclear DNA synthesis and mitochondrial function.

Cyclin D1 promotes nuclear DNA synthesis through phosphorylation and inactivation of the pRb tumor suppressor. Herein, cyclin D1 deficiency increased mitochondrial size and activity that was rescued by cyclin D1 in a Cdk-dependent manner. Nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1), which induces nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, was repressed in expression and activity by cyclin D1. Cyclin D1-dependent kinase phosphorylates NRF-1 at S47. Cyclin D1 abundance thus coordinates nuclear DNA synthesis and mitochondrial function.

Epigenetic regulation of nuclear steroid receptors.

Histone modifier proteins have come to the forefront in the study of gene regulation. It is now known that histone methyltransferases, acetytransferases, kinases, ubiquitinases, deacetylases and demethylases orchestrate expression of target genes by modifying both histone and non-histone proteins. The nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily govern such diverse biological processes as development, physiology and disease, including human cancer. The involvement of NR in complexes with coactivators and corepressors is necessary for regulation of target genes. This review focuses on the newly recognized interactions between the NR and histone modifying enzymes. In addition to regulating histones, the histone modifying proteins directly modify and thereby regulate NR activity. In the same manner that signaling platforms exist within the histone tails that are post-translationally processed by histone modifying proteins, cascades of post-translational modification have been identified within the NR that coordinate their activity. This review focuses on the regulation of the NR estrogen receptor (ERalpha), androgen receptor (AR) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma), given their role in tumor onset and progression.

RhoA modulates Smad signaling during transforming growth factor-beta-induced smooth muscle differentiation.

We recently reported that transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta induced the neural crest stem cell line Monc-1 to differentiate into a spindle-like contractile smooth muscle cell (SMC) phenotype and that Smad signaling played an important role in this phenomenon. In addition to Smad signaling, other pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositol-3 kinase, and RhoA have also been shown to mediate TGF-beta actions. The objectives of this study were to examine whether these signaling pathways contribute to TGF-beta-induced SMC development and to test whether Smad signaling cross-talks with other pathway(s) during SMC differentiation induced by TGF-beta. We demonstrate here that RhoA signaling is critical to TGF-beta-induced SMC differentiation. RhoA kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y27632 significantly blocks the expression of multiple SMC markers such as smooth muscle alpha-actin, SM22alpha, and calponin in TGF-beta-treated Monc-1 cells. In addition, Y27632 reversed the cell morphology and abolished the contractility of TGF-beta-treated cells. RhoA signaling was activated as early as 5 min following TGF-beta addition. Dominant negative RhoA blocked nuclear translocation of Smad2 and Smad3 because of the inhibition of phosphorylation of both Smads and inhibited Smad-dependent SBE promoter activity, whereas constitutively active RhoA significantly enhanced SBE promoter activity. Consistent with these results, C3 exotoxin, an inhibitor of RhoA activation, significantly attenuated SBE promoter activity and inhibited Smad nuclear translocation. Taken together, these data point to a new role for RhoA as a modulator of Smad activation while regulating TGF-beta-induced SMC differentiation.

Epigenetics and the estrogen receptor.

The position effect variegation in Drosophila and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and higher-order chromatin structure regulation in yeast, is orchestrated by modifier genes of the Su(var) group, (e.g., histone deacetylases ([HDACs]), protein phosphatases) and enhancer E(Var) group (e.g., ATP [adenosine 5'-triphosphate]-dependent nucleosome remodeling proteins). Higher-order chromatin structure is regulated in part by covalent modification of the N-terminal histone tails of chromatin, and histone tails in turn serve as platforms for recruitment of signaling modules that include nonhistone proteins such as heterochromatin protein (HP1) and NuRD. Because the enzymes governing chromatin structure through covalent modifications of histones (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination) can also target nonhistone substrates, a mechanism is in place by which epigenetic regulatory processes can affect the function of these alternate substrates. The posttranslational modification of histones, through phosphorylation and acetylation at specific residues, alters chromatin structure in an orchestrated manner in response to specific signals and is considered the basis of a "histone code." In an analogous manner, specific residues within transcription factors form a signaling module within the transcription factor to determine genetic target specificity and cellular fate. The architecture of these signaling cascades in transcription factors (SCITs) are poorly understood. The regulation of estrogen receptor (ERalpha) by enzymes that convey epigenetic signals is carefully orchestrated and is reviewed here.

Suv39h histone methyltransferases interact with Smads and cooperate in BMP-induced repression.

Smad proteins transduce signals from transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily ligands to regulate the expression of target genes. In order to identify novel partners of Smad proteins in transcriptional regulation, we performed a two-hybrid screen using Smad5, a protein that is activated predominantly by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. We identified an interaction between Smad5 and suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 2 (Suv39h2), a chromatin modifier enzyme. Suv39h proteins are histone methyltransferases that methylate histone H3 on lysine 9, resulting in transcriptional repression or silencing of target genes. Biochemical studies in mammalian cells demonstrated that Smad5 binds to both known mammalian isoforms of Suv39h proteins, and that Smad proteins activated by the TGF-beta signaling pathway, Smad2 and Smad3, do not bind with significant affinity. Functional studies using the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter, which is suppressed by BMP signaling, demonstrate that Suv39h proteins and Smads cooperate to repress promoter activity. These data suggest a model where association of Smad proteins with Suv39h methyltransferases can repress or silence genes involved in developmental processes, and argues that inefficient gene repression may result in the alteration of the differentiated phenotype. Thus, examination of the Smad-Suv interaction may provide insight into the mechanism of phenotypic determination mediated by BMP signaling.