How is equity captured for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer incidence and screening in the Republic of Ireland: A review.

Introduction: Organised screening reduces the incidence and late-stage diagnosis of cancer. However, participation in screening is not consistent across populations. Variations can be measured using demographic factors on place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic position (SEP), and social capital (PROGRESS-Plus stratifiers). The Republic of Ireland has screening programmes for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer but assessment of screening participation and cancer incidence is inconsistent. The review aimed to evaluate the use of stratifiers in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer incidence and screening literature, and assess variations in incidence and screening participation across subgroups in Ireland. Methods: PubMed was searched systematically and grey literature was identified via Google, Google Scholar, Lenus (Irish Health Research repository), and The Irish Longitudinal Study of Aging (TILDA) in June 2022. Studies were included if they captured stratifiers alongside incidence or screening participation data of the three cancers. Results: Thirty-six studies and reports were included. Place of residence, SEP, sex, and age were most frequently captured. Incidence and screening participation varied by age, place of residence, SEP, and sex. Discussion: PROGRESS-Plus is a useful equity lens to review health literature. Cancer incidence and screening participation studies lacked a comprehensive equity lens resulting in difficulties in identifying inequities and non-attenders. Place of residence, SEP and ethnicity should be prioritised in monitoring inequities. Integrating unique health identifiers should improve monitoring and enable evidence-based population-specific interventions to promote screening. Collaboration with community organisations would support engagement with vulnerable populations when data is limited.

A Festive Case Series of Emergencies, Admissions and Friendship at a Busy Oral and Maxillofacial Unit.

The festive season presents oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) dental core trainees (DCTs) with the challenges of managing an eclectic mix of emergencies. We present three such patients in this case series. First, Patient A, a 39-year-old homeless male who presented with a maxillary extra-oral draining sinus. Secondly, Patient B, a 38-year-old intra-venous (IV) drug user who suffered pan-facial fractures following an alcohol-fuelled assault. Finally, Patient C, a 38-year-old male who sustained a left zygomatic complex fracture a week previously, in attendance for corrective surgery. Despite the hardship, there was still festive cheer to be had by these individuals. Clinical relevance: Primary and secondary care practitioners should be aware of the advanced clinical presentation of dental and maxillofacial emergencies that occur over holiday periods.