Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 139(2): 73-76, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34140266

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study voice prosthesis survival, complications, efficacy and impact on quality of life. METHODS: A single-center observational study was performed in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx by total (pharyngo)-laryngectomy between 2010 and 2015. Study data comprised: maximum phonation time (sec), number of and reasons for prosthesis exchanges (leakage through or around the prosthesis, expulsion or inclusion of the prosthesis), plus 2 quality of life questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35) and the Voice Handicap Inventory (VHI 30). RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The most common causes of prosthesis exchange were leakage through (73.2%) or around the prosthesis (18.5%). The median time between exchanges was 4 months. Global quality of life status on the QLQ-C30 was 63.5. Mean maximum phonation time was 7.4sec. Mean VHI was 46/120; 10 patients had a mild voice handicap, 12 moderate and 10 severe. No relation emerged between the number of prosthesis exchanges per year and quality of life. Voice handicap significantly decreased quality of life, with QLQ-C30 72.3 for the 22 patients with mild to moderate voice handicap and 44.2 for the 10 patients with severe voice handicap (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Voice restoration by tracheoesophageal prosthesis after total (pharyngo)-laryngectomy is a reliable technique that decreases voice handicap and, despite potentially serious complications, has little negative impact on quality of life.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Laríngeas , Laringe Artificial , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Voz , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Laringectomia/efeitos adversos , Laringectomia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Fala , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia
2.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S11-S18, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863156

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.


Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva , Linguagem Infantil , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Comunicação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/etiologia , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Inclusão Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Fonoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S5-S9, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891589

RESUMO

Cochlear and brainstem implants have been included on the list of reimbursable products (LPPR) in France since March of 2009. The implants were initially inscribed for 5 years, after which an application for renewal with the French National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies (Commission Nationale d'évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologies de santé - CNEDiMTS) was required [Haute Autorité de santé, 2009]. Upon registration to the list of reimbursable products, the companies and the reference centers for cochlear and brainstem implants were asked to set up a post-registration registry called EPIIC. This article reports the evolution in the EPIIC registry of the general indicators for 5051 patients over the five years from 2012-2016.


Assuntos
Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/economia , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/economia , Segurança Computacional , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , França , Guias como Assunto/normas , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Controle de Qualidade , Padrões de Referência , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S45-S49, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826202

RESUMO

This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Falha de Prótese , Reimplante/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
5.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S57-S63, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32792302

RESUMO

This study concerns the results of cochlear implantation in children and adults from French cochlear implantation centers, monitored at one, two and three years by the Cochlear Implant French Registry EPIIC. This multicenter study enrolled 2603 subjects (1667 adults and 936 children) implanted in one ear. The following parameters were studied: hearing overall performances, monosyllabic or dissyllabic word perception, speech intelligibility, self-assessment questionnaire of Cochlear Implant (CI) benefits (Abbreviated profile of Hearing aid Benefit); professional activity and schooling. This study confirms the ceiling effect in adults' performances after the 1st year and the progressive growth in children's performances. It also shows that the contralateral hearing aid enhances performances compared to the CI alone condition, in all follow-up sessions. The French register of CIs is the only worldwide register of systematic follow-up on a period of three years and more of all adults and children implanted in a country.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Percepção Auditiva , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Educação , Emprego , Seguimentos , França , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Inteligibilidade da Fala , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S19-S25, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773333

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. RESULTS: The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Percepção Auditiva , Implante Coclear/métodos , Comunicação , Feminino , França , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Testes Auditivos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
7.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S27-S35, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763084

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.


Assuntos
Implante Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Audiometria da Fala/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem
8.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S51-S56, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739279

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the incidence and results of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults and children in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of data in the French national registry of cochlear implantations from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2016. Functional results from CAP (Category of Auditory Performance) questionnaires and speech audiometry tests, with mono- and di-syllabic word-lists, were compared before and after implantation. Speech audiometry tests were carried out against a noisy background, except before simultaneous implantations. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty two bilateral cochlear implantations were performed during this period, that is, 16.4% of all cochlear implantations. Five hundred and eighty eight bilateral implantations were performed sequentially. 59% of the bilateral implantations were performed in children. Bilateral implants significantly improved CAP scores in all cases (P<0.001). Auditory performance, with the two types of word-list, were significantly improved after simultaneous implantation (P<0.01). After sequential implantation, the speech discrimination score, already very good with the first implant, reached 63±26% [0-100] with monosyllabic word lists, and 72±28% [0-100] with dissyllabic words. There were more complications due to surgery in bilateral cases than in the entire population of cochlear recipients (9.1% vs 6.4%, P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Hearing is significantly improved by simultaneous cochlear implantation. For sequential implantation, at one year, when auditory results were already excellent from the first implant, in the bimodal condition CAP scores were significantly improved, although there was no further change in speech audiometry in noise.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/reabilitação , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Audiometria da Fala/métodos , Percepção Auditiva , Criança , Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Surdez/etiologia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes de Discriminação da Fala/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S37-S43, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861600

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative complications related to cochlear implantations. We searched for risk factors predicting these complications and analyzed the complications in the youngest and most elderly. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent cochlear implantation in France between January 2012 and December 2016 were anonymized and registered in the EPIIC database. This population included 3483 adults and 2245 children. Their demographic and surgical data and their incidence of peri- or post-operative complications, including their severity, whether major or minor, were all indicated. RESULTS: The global complication rate was 6.84%. The risk of complication was higher in initial implantation versus reimplantation (P<0.0001). The risk was also higher for bilateral implantation versus unilateral (P<0.0001). Complications were more frequent for patients with cochlear malformation (P=0.002). There was no difference in complication rates across age groups; babies under 1 year old, and the elderly over 80 and even over 90, did not have more complications than the rest of the population. Patients treated in the daily care unit had no more complications than those who were hospitalized for one night or more (P=0.64). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a safe technique with a low incidence of complications. The absence of increased risk in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum justifies offering this solution to all, without age limitation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cóclea/anormalidades , Implante Coclear/métodos , Hospital Dia/estatística & dados numéricos , França/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
10.
Nature ; 450(7170): 654-6, 2007 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18046399

RESUMO

Venus has no significant internal magnetic field, which allows the solar wind to interact directly with its atmosphere. A field is induced in this interaction, which partially shields the atmosphere, but we have no knowledge of how effective that shield is at solar minimum. (Our current knowledge of the solar wind interaction with Venus is derived from measurements at solar maximum.) The bow shock is close to the planet, meaning that it is possible that some solar wind could be absorbed by the atmosphere and contribute to the evolution of the atmosphere. Here we report magnetic field measurements from the Venus Express spacecraft in the plasma environment surrounding Venus. The bow shock under low solar activity conditions seems to be in the position that would be expected from a complete deflection by a magnetized ionosphere. Therefore little solar wind enters the Venus ionosphere even at solar minimum.

11.
Acta Paediatr ; 96(7): 1021-4, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17524020

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) is a multi-systemic disease caused by mutational inactivation of the ATM gene. We report a retrospective study of lung disease in 15 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A diagnosis of AT was made if the patient met the following criteria: neurological features and at least one the following: oculo-cutaneous telangiectasia, elevated serum alpha-feto-protein level. RESULTS: Recurrent sino-pulmonary infections were usually present in 11 of the cases and occurred during the first 2 years of life. Other lung injuries noted were bronchiectasis, obstruction and restriction of the airways, fibrosis, pneumothorax and haemoptysis. Eleven children had immunodeficiencies. DISCUSSION: Recurrent sino-pulmonary manifestations precede neurological complications, but the severity of neuro-degeneration and pulmonary disease were not correlated. Pulmonary status was a prognosis factor. Immunodeficiency was the main, but not the only, aetiology for lung disease in AT. CONCLUSION: There is little dispute over the role of ATM in lung and respiratory epithelium. To reduce the morbidity associated with AT, there needs to be greater awareness of respiratory complications. Early management and monitoring lung function is necessary to minimize lung damage.


Assuntos
Ataxia Telangiectasia , Pneumopatias , Adolescente , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias , Ataxia Telangiectasia/complicações , Ataxia Telangiectasia/imunologia , Bronquiectasia , Feminino , Humanos , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Pneumopatias/imunologia , Masculino , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac ; 124(1): 33-40, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17336916

RESUMO

The conventional hearing aid has benefited from the progress made in electronic miniaturization and digital signal processing. The prescriber should be familiar with these improvements, the anatomic and acoustic limitations related to hearing aids, the possibilities of surgical rehabilitation, as well as the indications for other auditive rehabilitation techniques (bone conduction hearing, middle ear implant, and cochlear implant). A hearing aid should be prescribed within a precise context taking into account patient history, clinical examination, audiometric testing, and choice of the device. Optimal management of a hearing device for a child should be conducted within an adapted network including a specialized ENT physician, audiophonology, a qualified hearing prosthetist, a speech therapist, etc.).


Assuntos
Auxiliares de Audição , Adaptação Fisiológica , Audiometria , Condução Óssea , Transtornos da Audição/terapia , Humanos , Miniaturização , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Localização de Som
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...