Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches.

Despite the widespread use of methods that are supposed to detect the sincerity of patients' efforts in clinical assessment, little has been written summarizing the literature that addresses the reliability and validity of measurements obtained with these methods. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the reliability and validity of scores for Waddell's nonorganic signs, descriptions of pain behavior and symptom magnification, coefficients of variation, correlations between musculoskeletal evaluation and function, grip measurements, and the relationship between heart rate and pain intensity. The authors of the articles reviewed conclude that none of these methods have been examined adequately. Some of these methods, such as Waddell's nonorganic signs, were not developed for the purpose of detecting sincerity of effort. Clinicians are encouraged to critically read the literature addressing these methods. With further research, some of the discussed methods may prove useful. Until such research is reported in the peer-reviewed literature, however, clinicians should avoid basing evaluation of sincerity of effort on these tests. Therapists are encouraged, instead, to use a biobehavioral approach to better understand and address the complex factors underlying delayed recovery.

The effects of lumbosacral support belts and abdominal muscle strength on functional lifting ability in healthy women.

STUDY DESIGN: This study focused on lumbosacral support belts, abdominal muscle strength, and lifting ability in healthy women. Subjects underwent manual muscle testing to determine muscle strength and performed lifting procedures to determine lifting capacity. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is threefold: 1) to determine the effectiveness of lumbosacral support belts in improving lifting ability in healthy women, 2) to determine if lumbosacral support belts are more effective for those with weak abdominals than those with strong abdominals, and 3) to determine if the maximum amount of weight varies with abdominal muscle strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In a review of published literature, one study has addressed the relationship of lumbosacral support belts and lifting capacity. However, no study has examined the use of lumbosacral support belts and lifting capacity in a female population. METHODS: A convenient sample of 69 healthy women, aged 20 to 40 years, participated in this study. Subjects were categorized into one of three groups based on lower and upper abdominal muscle strength. Each subject then performed two lifting procedures, one with a lumbosacral support belt and one without, to determine two maximum lifts. RESULTS: Women between the ages of 20 and 40 years could lift approximately 1.0 kg more weight from the floor to waist height with the lumbosacral support belt. The maximum weight lifted varied with abdominal strength. Lumbosacral support belts were not more effective for those with weak abdominals than those with strong abdominals. CONCLUSIONS: When applied properly and used in conjunction with proper lifting technique, lumbosacral support belts slightly improved lifting ability in healthy women. The magnitude of the increase, although statistically significant, is not sufficient to advocate the use of lumbosacral support belts to increase lifting capacity.

Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance.

This study examined the interrater reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work abilities, the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. Eleven physical therapists were trained to administer and score this evaluation. From this group, two therapists at a time simultaneously and independently evaluated 50 patients with musculoskeletal disorders as they performed the tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. At the conclusion of the evaluation, each therapist determined the safe level of physical work for each patient. A comparison of the two independent evaluations was used to determine reliability. To determine validity, the predicted level of work was compared with the actual level of work. Kappa coefficient between the two therapists on the level of work was .83. Spearman rho correlations between the predicted and actual levels of work ranged from .41 to .55. Only 14 to 18% were working above the level predicted by the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. These results indicate high interrater reliability. Given the lack of a perfect standard for validity comparisons, these results also provide evidence in support of convergent validity. The test can be used in making decisions regarding return to work after injury, preemployment placement, and vocational exploration.

Work hardening and work conditioning interventions: do they affect disability?

The purpose of this article is to review the research on the effectiveness of work hardening and work conditioning programs. Twelve studies of work hardening and work conditioning programs in the United States and abroad were reviewed. One study produced convincing evidence in a randomized study that a work conditioning program was useful in producing a higher percentage of return to work and an earlier return to work in a group of patients off work for at least 2 months. Another study demonstrated that a work hardening program increased the rate of return to work by 52% in patients off work for greater than 4 months. Most of the other studies reviewed suggested positive results, but more carefully documented, randomized, and controlled studies are needed to support the efficacy of these programs and to determine the optimum and most cost-effective work hardening and work conditioning interventions.

Gait deviations in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

The purpose of this study was to describe quantitatively the gait patterns of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Thirty children with JRA and 30 healthy children were evaluated using a computerized gait analysis system. Time-distance characteristics and joint angle excursions were studied. The subjects with JRA walked with significantly decreased velocity, cadence, and stride length. We found no significant difference in step width nor in the percentage of time spent in each phase of the gait cycle. The anterior pelvic tilt of subjects with JRA was significantly increased throughout the gait cycle. Hip extension at the end of single-limb stance and ankle plantar flexion during weight release also were significantly decreased for subjects with JRA. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in knee joint excursion. Areas of emphasis for physical therapy of patients with JRA include increasing velocity, cadence, stride length, hip extension, and ankle plantar flexion and decreasing excessive anterior pelvic tilt.